Mona Baker & Gabriela Saldanha. Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies (2nd edition)

Подождите немного. Документ загружается.

Page650

——(1991)‘WhatareDescriptiveStudiesintoTranslationLikelytoYield

apartfromIsolatedDescriptions?’,inKittyvanLeuvenZwartandTon

Naaijkens(eds)TranslationStudies:TheStateoftheArt,Amsterdam:

Rodopi,179–92.

——(1993)‘StillinSearchofLawsofTranslationalBehaviour:Closinginon

DiscourseInterference’,inKingaKlaudyandJánosKohn(eds)Transferre

NecesseEst…CurrentIssuesofTranslationTheory,Szombathely:

BerzsenyiDániel,21–38.

——(1995)DescriptiveTranslationStudiesandBeyond,Amsterdam&

Philadelphia:JohnBenjamins.

——(1999)‘CulturePlanningandTranslation’,inAlbertoAlvarezLugrísand

AnxoFernándezOcampo(eds)Anovaranosar,estudiosdetraduccióne

interpretación(Vol.1),Vigo:UniversidadedeVigo,13–26.

——(2004)‘ProbabilisticExplanationsinTranslationStudies:Welcomeasthey

are,wouldtheyQualifyasUniversals?’,inAnnaMauranenandPekka

Kujamäki(eds)TranslationUniversals.DotheyExist?,Amsterdam&

Philadelphia:JohnBenjamins,15–32.

——andJoséLambert(1989)‘OnTarget’sTargets’,Target1(1):1–7.

Townsend,R.F.(2004)Hero,Hawk,andOpenHand.AmericanIndianArt

oftheAncientMidwestandSouth,Chicago:ArtInstituteofChicago&Yale

UniversityPress.

Toye,W.(ed.)(1983)TheOxfordCompaniontoCanadianLiterature,

Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.

Traugott,ElizabethCloss(1981)‘TheVoiceofVariedLinguisticandCultural

GroupsinFiction:SomeCriteriafortheUseofLanguageVarietiesinWriting’,

inMarciaFarrWhiteman(ed.)VariationinWriting:Functionaland

LinguisticCulturalDifferences,Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbaum,111–36.

Tribe,Rachel(1999)‘BridgingtheGaporDamningtheFlow?Some

ObservationsonUsingInterpreters/BiculturalWorkersWhenWorkingwith

RefugeeClients,ManyofWhomHaveBeenTortured’,BritishJournalof

MedicalPsychology72(4):567–76.

——andHiteshRaval(2003)WorkingwithInterpretersinMentalHealth,

NewYork:BrunnerRoutledge.

Trivedi,Harish(2005)‘TranslatingCulturevs.CulturalTranslation’,91st

Meridian,May2005,http://www.uiowa.edu/91st/vol4_n1/index.html

(accessed16July2008).

——(2006)‘InOurOwnTime,OnOurOwnTerms’,inTheoHermans(ed.)

TranslatingOthersI,Manchester:StJerome,102–19.

——(2007)‘TranslatingCulturevs.CulturalTranslation’,inPaulStPierreand

ParfullaC.Kar(eds)InTranslation–Reflections,Refractions,

Transformations,AmsterdamandPhiladelphia:JohnBenjamins,277–87.

Troianos,S.andI.VeilssaropoulouKarakosta(1993)IstoriaDikaiou

[HistoryofLaw],Athens,Komotini:Sakkoulas.

Trosborg,Anna(1997)‘TranslatingHybridPoliticalTexts’,inAnnaTrosborg

(ed.)TextTypologyandTranslation,Amsterdam&Philadelphia:John

Benjamins,145–58.

Trost,Klaus(1978)‘UntersuchungenfürÜberekonystheorieundPraxisdes

späterenKirchenslavischen’,ForumSlavicum43.

Trujillo,Arturo(1999)TranslationEngines:TechniquesforMachine

Translation,Springer.

Tsai,Claire(2005)‘InsidetheTelevisionNewsroom:AnInsider’sViewof

InternationalTranslationinTaiwan’,LanguageandIntercultural

Communication2(2):145–53.

Tsuda,M.(2002)‘NonJapaneseSpeakingSuspects/Defendantsandthe

CriminalJusticeSysteminJapan’,InterpretationStudies(JournaloftheJapan

AssociationforInterpretationStudies)2:1–14.

Tumber,HowardandFrankWebster(2006)JournalistsUnderFire.

InformationWarandJournalisticPractice,London:Sage.

Turner,GrahamandKyraPollitt(2002)‘CommunityInterpretingMeets

LiteraryTranslation:English–BritishSignLanguageInterpretingintheTheatre’,

TheTranslator8(1):25–48.

Twine,N.(1991)LanguageandtheModernState:TheReformofWritten

Japanese,London:Routledge.

Tymoczko,Maria(1998)‘ComputerizedCorporaandtheFutureof

TranslationStudies’,inSaraLaviosa(ed.)L’Approchebaséesurlecorpus/

TheCorpusBasedApproach,SpecialIssueofMeta43(4):652–60.

——(1999a)TranslationinaPostcolonialContext:EarlyIrishLiterature

inEnglishTranslation,Manchester:StJerome.

Page651

——(1999b)‘PostColonialWritingandLiteraryTranslation’,inSusan

BassnettandHarishTrivedi(eds)PostColonialTranslation:Theoryand

Practice,LondonandNewYork:Routledge,19–40.

——(2000a)‘TranslationandPoliticalEngagement:Activism,SocialChange

andtheRoleofTranslationinGeopoliticalShifts’,TheTranslator6(1):23–47.

——(2000b)‘WinteringOutwithIrishPoetry:AffiliationandAutobiographyin

EnglishTranslation(ReviewofSeamusHeaney’sSweeneyAstray)’,The

Translator6(2):309–17.

——(2002a)‘TranslationofThemselves:TheContoursofPostcolonial

Fiction’,inSherrySimonandPaulStPierre(eds)ChangingtheTerms:

TranslatinginthePostcolonialEra,NewDelhi:OrientLongman,147–63.

——(2002b)‘ConnectingtheTwoInfiniteOrders:ResearchMethodsin

TranslationStudies’,inTheoHermans(ed.)CrossculturalTransgressions:

ResearchModelsinTranslationStudiesII,HistoricalandIdeological

Issues,Manchester:StJerome,9–25.

——(2003)‘IdeologyandthePositionoftheTranslator:InWhatSenseIsa

Translator“Inbetween”?’,inMaríaCalzadaPérez(ed.)AproposofIdeology.

TranslationStudiesonIdeology–IdeologiesinTranslationStudies,

Manchester:StJerome,181–201.

——(2006)‘ReconceptualizingWesternTranslationTheory’,inTheoHermans

(ed.)TranslatingOthersI,Manchester:StJerome,13–32.

——(2007)EnlargingTranslation,EmpoweringTranslators,Manchester:

StJerome.

——andEdwinGentzler(eds)(2002)TranslationandPower,Amherst&

Boston,MA:UniversityofMassachusettsPress.

Tynyanov,YuryN.(1929)ArkhaistyInovatory[ArchaistsandInnovators],

Moscow:Akademia;reprinted1967,Munich:WilhelmFink.

——(1971)‘OnLiteraryEvolution’,trans.C.A.Luplow,inLadislavMatejka

andKrystynaPomorska(eds)ReadingsinRussianPoetics:Formalistand

StructuralistViews,Cambridge,MA:MITPress,66–78.

Tytler,AlexanderFraser,LordWoodhouselee(1791)Essaysonthe

PrinciplesofTranslation(3rdedition)(1813),Edinburgh:Archibald

Constable&Company.

Tyulenev,Sergei(inpress)‘TranslatingSexualitiesinRussia:Historical

Aspects’.

UKBookPublishingIndustryStatisticsYearbook(2007)London:The

PublishersAssociation.

Ulrych,Margherita(2000)‘DomesticationandForeignisationinFilm

Translation’,inChristopherTaylor(ed.)TradurreilCinema,Trieste:

DipartimentodiScienzedelLinguaggiodell’interpretazioneedellatraduzione,

127–44.

UNESCO(2006)Indextranslationum:Répertoireinternationaldes

traductions.Internationalbibliographyoftranslations,Paris:Unesco.

http://www.unesco.org/culture/xtrans/(accessed22January2008).

UNESCOCOURIER(1983)‘TheIndianLanguagesofLatinAmerica’,

Volume7:12–14.

Upton,CaroleAnn(2000)MovingTarget:TheatreTranslationand

CulturalRelocation,Manchester:StJerome.

Ustinova,IrinaP.(2006)‘EnglishandEmergingAdvertisinginRussia’,World

Englishes25(2):267–77.

Utka,Andrius(2004)‘PhasesofTranslationCorpus:Compilationand

Analysis’,InternationalJournalofCorpusLinguistics9(2):195–224.

Vaillant,A.(1948)‘Lapréfacedel’évangéliairevieuxslave’,Revuedes

étudesslaves24:5–20.

Valdeón,RobertoA.(2005)‘The“Translated”SpanishServiceoftheBBC’,

AcrossLanguagesandCultures6(2):195–200.

——(2007)‘IdeologicalIndependenceorNegativeMediation:BBCMundo

andCNNenEspañol’s(translated)ReportingofMadrid’sTerroristAttacks’,

inMyriamSalamaCarr(ed.)TranslatingandInterpretingConflict,

Amsterdam&NewYork:Rodopi,99–118.

Valdés,Cristina(2000)‘ReceptionFactorsinTranslatedAdvertisements’,in

AndrewChesterman,NatividadGallardoSanSalvadorandYvesGambier

(eds)TranslationinContext,AmsterdamandPhiladelphia:JohnBenjamins,

271–80.

Valentini,Cristina(2006)‘AMultimediaDatabasefortheTrainingof

AudiovisualTranslators’,TheJournalofSpecialisedTranslation6:68–83.

ValeroGarcés,Carmen(2000)‘Latraduccióndelcómic:retos,estrategiasy

resultados’[TheTranslationofComics:Challenges,Strategies

Page651

——(1999b)‘PostColonialWritingandLiteraryTranslation’,inSusan

BassnettandHarishTrivedi(eds)PostColonialTranslation:Theoryand

Practice,LondonandNewYork:Routledge,19–40.

——(2000a)‘TranslationandPoliticalEngagement:Activism,SocialChange

andtheRoleofTranslationinGeopoliticalShifts’,TheTranslator6(1):23–47.

——(2000b)‘WinteringOutwithIrishPoetry:AffiliationandAutobiographyin

EnglishTranslation(ReviewofSeamusHeaney’sSweeneyAstray)’,The

Translator6(2):309–17.

——(2002a)‘TranslationofThemselves:TheContoursofPostcolonial

Fiction’,inSherrySimonandPaulStPierre(eds)ChangingtheTerms:

TranslatinginthePostcolonialEra,NewDelhi:OrientLongman,147–63.

——(2002b)‘ConnectingtheTwoInfiniteOrders:ResearchMethodsin

TranslationStudies’,inTheoHermans(ed.)CrossculturalTransgressions:

ResearchModelsinTranslationStudiesII,HistoricalandIdeological

Issues,Manchester:StJerome,9–25.

——(2003)‘IdeologyandthePositionoftheTranslator:InWhatSenseIsa

Translator“Inbetween”?’,inMaríaCalzadaPérez(ed.)AproposofIdeology.

TranslationStudiesonIdeology–IdeologiesinTranslationStudies,

Manchester:StJerome,181–201.

——(2006)‘ReconceptualizingWesternTranslationTheory’,inTheoHermans

(ed.)TranslatingOthersI,Manchester:StJerome,13–32.

——(2007)EnlargingTranslation,EmpoweringTranslators,Manchester:

StJerome.

——andEdwinGentzler(eds)(2002)TranslationandPower,Amherst&

Boston,MA:UniversityofMassachusettsPress.

Tynyanov,YuryN.(1929)ArkhaistyInovatory[ArchaistsandInnovators],

Moscow:Akademia;reprinted1967,Munich:WilhelmFink.

——(1971)‘OnLiteraryEvolution’,trans.C.A.Luplow,inLadislavMatejka

andKrystynaPomorska(eds)ReadingsinRussianPoetics:Formalistand

StructuralistViews,Cambridge,MA:MITPress,66–78.

Tytler,AlexanderFraser,LordWoodhouselee(1791)Essaysonthe

PrinciplesofTranslation(3rdedition)(1813),Edinburgh:Archibald

Constable&Company.

Tyulenev,Sergei(inpress)‘TranslatingSexualitiesinRussia:Historical

Aspects’.

UKBookPublishingIndustryStatisticsYearbook(2007)London:The

PublishersAssociation.

Ulrych,Margherita(2000)‘DomesticationandForeignisationinFilm

Translation’,inChristopherTaylor(ed.)TradurreilCinema,Trieste:

DipartimentodiScienzedelLinguaggiodell’interpretazioneedellatraduzione,

127–44.

UNESCO(2006)Indextranslationum:Répertoireinternationaldes

traductions.Internationalbibliographyoftranslations,Paris:Unesco.

http://www.unesco.org/culture/xtrans/(accessed22January2008).

UNESCOCOURIER(1983)‘TheIndianLanguagesofLatinAmerica’,

Volume7:12–14.

Upton,CaroleAnn(2000)MovingTarget:TheatreTranslationand

CulturalRelocation,Manchester:StJerome.

Ustinova,IrinaP.(2006)‘EnglishandEmergingAdvertisinginRussia’,World

Englishes25(2):267–77.

Utka,Andrius(2004)‘PhasesofTranslationCorpus:Compilationand

Analysis’,InternationalJournalofCorpusLinguistics9(2):195–224.

Vaillant,A.(1948)‘Lapréfacedel’évangéliairevieuxslave’,Revuedes

étudesslaves24:5–20.

Valdeón,RobertoA.(2005)‘The“Translated”SpanishServiceoftheBBC’,

AcrossLanguagesandCultures6(2):195–200.

——(2007)‘IdeologicalIndependenceorNegativeMediation:BBCMundo

andCNNenEspañol’s(translated)ReportingofMadrid’sTerroristAttacks’,

inMyriamSalamaCarr(ed.)TranslatingandInterpretingConflict,

Amsterdam&NewYork:Rodopi,99–118.

Valdés,Cristina(2000)‘ReceptionFactorsinTranslatedAdvertisements’,in

AndrewChesterman,NatividadGallardoSanSalvadorandYvesGambier

(eds)TranslationinContext,AmsterdamandPhiladelphia:JohnBenjamins,

271–80.

Valentini,Cristina(2006)‘AMultimediaDatabasefortheTrainingof

AudiovisualTranslators’,TheJournalofSpecialisedTranslation6:68–83.

ValeroGarcés,Carmen(2000)‘Latraduccióndelcómic:retos,estrategiasy

resultados’[TheTranslationofComics:Challenges,Strategies

Page652

andResults],Trans:Revistadetraductología4:75–88.

——(2002)‘InteractionandConversationalConstructionsintheRelationships

betweenSuppliersofServicesandImmigrantUsers’,Pragmatics12(4):469–

96.

VanCoillie,JanandWalterP.Verschueren(eds)(2006)Children’s

LiteratureinTranslation:ChallengesandStrategies,Manchester:St

Jerome.

Vandaele,Jeroen(2002)‘“FunnyFictions”:FrancoistTranslationCensorship

ofTwoBillyWilderFilms’,TheTranslator8(2):267–302.

Vandaele,S.(2003)‘WebCT:unepanacéepourl’enseignementdela

traductionmédicale?’,Meta48(3):370–78.

VandenBroeck,Raymond(1984–1985)‘Verschuivingenindestilistiekvan

vertaaldeliteraireteksten:eensemiotischebenadering’,Linguistica

Antverpiensia18–19:111–45.

——(1985)‘SecondThoughtsonTranslationCriticism:AModelofAnalytic

Function’,inTheoHermans(ed.)TheManipulationofLiterature:Studiesin

LiteraryTranslation,NewYork:StMartin’sPress,54–62.

——(1986)‘GenericShiftsinTranslatedTexts’,NewComparison1:104–16.

——(1988)‘TranslationfortheTheatre’,inJ.T.Ydstie(ed.)InHonourof

PatrickNigelChaffeyontheOccasionofhis50thBirthday,22September

1998withContributionsfromFriendsandColleagues,Oslo:Centrefor

AppliedLinguistics,UniversityofOslo.

——andAndréLefevere(1979)Uitnodigingtotdevertaalwetenschap,

Muiderberg:Coutinho.

vanDijk,Teun(1991)RacismandthePress,London:Routledge.

——(1998)Ideology:AMultidisciplinaryApproach,London,Thousand

Oaks&NewDelhi:Sage.

——andWalterKintsch(1983)StrategiesofDiscourseComprehension,

Orlando&London:AcademicPress.

VanHoofHaferkamp,Renée(1989)‘Preface’,inDanicaSeleskovitchand

MarianneLederer,Pédagogieraisonnéedel´interprétation(1stedition),

Paris:DidierErudition,3–4.

vanHoof,Henri(1991)Histoiredelatraductionenoccident:France,

GrandeBretagne,Allemagne,Russie,PaysBas,ParisandLouvainla

Neuve:Duculot.

vanHoof,René(1962)Théorieetpratiquedel’interprétation(avec

applicationparticulièreàl’anglaisetaufrançais),München:MaxHueber.

VanKampen,Kimberly(1997)‘TheBibleinPrintinEnglandbeforeTyndale’,

Reformation2:111–26.

VanLeeuwen,Theo(2006)‘Translation,Adaptation,Globalization:the

VietnamNews’,Journalism7(2):217–37.

vanLeuvenZwart,KittyM.(1984)Vertalingenorigineel:Een

vergelijkendebeschrijvingsmethodevoorintegralevertalingen,

ontwikkeldaandehandvanNederlandsevertalingenvanSpaanse

narratieveteksten,Dordrecht:ForisPublications.

——(1989)‘TranslationandOriginal:SimilaritiesandDissimilarities,I’,Target

1(2):151–81.

——(1990a)‘TranslationandOriginal:SimilaritiesandDissimilarities,II’,

Target2(1):69–95.

——(1990b)‘ShiftsofMeaninginTranslation:Do’sorDon’ts?’,inMarcel

ThelenandBarbaraLewandowskaTomaszyk(eds)Translationand

Meaning,Maastricht:Euroterm,226–34.

VanSteen,Gonda(2007)‘Translating–orNot–forPoliticalPropaganda:

Aeschylus’Persians402405’,inFrancescaBilliani(ed.)Modesof

CensorshipandTranslation.NationalContextsandDiverseMedia,

Manchester:StJerome,117–41.

Vanderauwera,Ria(1985)DutchNovelsTranslatedintoEnglish:The

Transformationofa‘Minority’Literature,Amsterdam:Rodopi.

Vanderschelden,Isabelle(2000a)‘QualityAssessmentandLiteraryTranslation

inFrance’,TheTranslator6(2):271–93.

——(2000b)‘WhyRetranslatetheFrenchClassics?TheImpactof

RetranslationonQuality’,inMyriamSalamaCarr(ed.)OnTranslating

FrenchLiteratureandFilmII:Amsterdam&Atlanta:Rodopi,1–18.

Vandewedhe,Willy,SoniaVandepitteandMarcVandeVelde(eds)(2007)

TheStudyofLanguageandTranslation,SpecialIssueofBelgianJournalof

Linguistics21,Amsterdam:JohnBenjamins.

Vaseva,Ivanka(1980)Teoriyaipraktikaperevoda,Sophia:Naukai

isskustvo.

Vatican(2001)Liturgiamauthenticam:OntheUseofVernacular

LanguagesinthePublicationoftheBooksoftheRoman

Page652

andResults],Trans:Revistadetraductología4:75–88.

——(2002)‘InteractionandConversationalConstructionsintheRelationships

betweenSuppliersofServicesandImmigrantUsers’,Pragmatics12(4):469–

96.

VanCoillie,JanandWalterP.Verschueren(eds)(2006)Children’s

LiteratureinTranslation:ChallengesandStrategies,Manchester:St

Jerome.

Vandaele,Jeroen(2002)‘“FunnyFictions”:FrancoistTranslationCensorship

ofTwoBillyWilderFilms’,TheTranslator8(2):267–302.

Vandaele,S.(2003)‘WebCT:unepanacéepourl’enseignementdela

traductionmédicale?’,Meta48(3):370–78.

VandenBroeck,Raymond(1984–1985)‘Verschuivingenindestilistiekvan

vertaaldeliteraireteksten:eensemiotischebenadering’,Linguistica

Antverpiensia18–19:111–45.

——(1985)‘SecondThoughtsonTranslationCriticism:AModelofAnalytic

Function’,inTheoHermans(ed.)TheManipulationofLiterature:Studiesin

LiteraryTranslation,NewYork:StMartin’sPress,54–62.

——(1986)‘GenericShiftsinTranslatedTexts’,NewComparison1:104–16.

——(1988)‘TranslationfortheTheatre’,inJ.T.Ydstie(ed.)InHonourof

PatrickNigelChaffeyontheOccasionofhis50thBirthday,22September

1998withContributionsfromFriendsandColleagues,Oslo:Centrefor

AppliedLinguistics,UniversityofOslo.

——andAndréLefevere(1979)Uitnodigingtotdevertaalwetenschap,

Muiderberg:Coutinho.

vanDijk,Teun(1991)RacismandthePress,London:Routledge.

——(1998)Ideology:AMultidisciplinaryApproach,London,Thousand

Oaks&NewDelhi:Sage.

——andWalterKintsch(1983)StrategiesofDiscourseComprehension,

Orlando&London:AcademicPress.

VanHoofHaferkamp,Renée(1989)‘Preface’,inDanicaSeleskovitchand

MarianneLederer,Pédagogieraisonnéedel´interprétation(1stedition),

Paris:DidierErudition,3–4.

vanHoof,Henri(1991)Histoiredelatraductionenoccident:France,

GrandeBretagne,Allemagne,Russie,PaysBas,ParisandLouvainla

Neuve:Duculot.

vanHoof,René(1962)Théorieetpratiquedel’interprétation(avec

applicationparticulièreàl’anglaisetaufrançais),München:MaxHueber.

VanKampen,Kimberly(1997)‘TheBibleinPrintinEnglandbeforeTyndale’,

Reformation2:111–26.

VanLeeuwen,Theo(2006)‘Translation,Adaptation,Globalization:the

VietnamNews’,Journalism7(2):217–37.

vanLeuvenZwart,KittyM.(1984)Vertalingenorigineel:Een

vergelijkendebeschrijvingsmethodevoorintegralevertalingen,

ontwikkeldaandehandvanNederlandsevertalingenvanSpaanse

narratieveteksten,Dordrecht:ForisPublications.

——(1989)‘TranslationandOriginal:SimilaritiesandDissimilarities,I’,Target

1(2):151–81.

——(1990a)‘TranslationandOriginal:SimilaritiesandDissimilarities,II’,

Target2(1):69–95.

——(1990b)‘ShiftsofMeaninginTranslation:Do’sorDon’ts?’,inMarcel

ThelenandBarbaraLewandowskaTomaszyk(eds)Translationand

Meaning,Maastricht:Euroterm,226–34.

VanSteen,Gonda(2007)‘Translating–orNot–forPoliticalPropaganda:

Aeschylus’Persians402405’,inFrancescaBilliani(ed.)Modesof

CensorshipandTranslation.NationalContextsandDiverseMedia,

Manchester:StJerome,117–41.

Vanderauwera,Ria(1985)DutchNovelsTranslatedintoEnglish:The

Transformationofa‘Minority’Literature,Amsterdam:Rodopi.

Vanderschelden,Isabelle(2000a)‘QualityAssessmentandLiteraryTranslation

inFrance’,TheTranslator6(2):271–93.

——(2000b)‘WhyRetranslatetheFrenchClassics?TheImpactof

RetranslationonQuality’,inMyriamSalamaCarr(ed.)OnTranslating

FrenchLiteratureandFilmII:Amsterdam&Atlanta:Rodopi,1–18.

Vandewedhe,Willy,SoniaVandepitteandMarcVandeVelde(eds)(2007)

TheStudyofLanguageandTranslation,SpecialIssueofBelgianJournalof

Linguistics21,Amsterdam:JohnBenjamins.

Vaseva,Ivanka(1980)Teoriyaipraktikaperevoda,Sophia:Naukai

isskustvo.

Vatican(2001)Liturgiamauthenticam:OntheUseofVernacular

LanguagesinthePublicationoftheBooksoftheRoman

Page653

Liturgy,

http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccdds/documents/rc_con_ccdd

authenticam_en.html(accessedOctober2007).

Vega,M.A.(ed.)(1994)Textosclásicosdeteoríadelatraducción,

Madrid:Cátedra.

VehmasLehto,Inkeri(1989)QuasiCorrectness.ACriticalStudyof

FinnishTranslationsofRussianJournalisticTexts,Helsinki:Neuvostoliitto

Instituutti.

Venneberg,Ute(1980)‘ProblemsinTranslatingSeanO’Casey’sDramaJuno

andthePaycock’,inOrtrunZuber(ed.)TheLanguagesofTheatre.

ProblemsintheTranslationandTranspositionofDrama,Oxford:

PergamonPress,121–31.

Ventola,Eija(ed.)(2000)DiscourseandCommunity;DoingFunctional

Linguistics,Tübingen:GunterNarr.

Venuti,Lawrence(1986)‘TheTranslator’sInvisibility’,Criticism28:179–212.

——(1991)‘GenealogiesofTranslationTheory:Schleiermacher’,TTR4(2):

125–50.

——(ed.)(1992)RethinkingTranslation:Discourse,Subjectivity,

Ideology,London&NewYork:Routledge.

——(1995a)TheTranslator’sInvisibility,London&NewYork:Routledge.

——(1995b)‘Translation,Authorship,Copyright’,TheTranslator1(1):1–

24.

——(1996)‘Translation,Heterogeneity,Linguistics’,TTR9(1):91–115.

——(ed.)(1998a)TranslationandMinority,SpecialIssueofThe

Translator4(2).

——(1998b)TheScandalsofTranslation,London:Routledge.

——(2000a)‘Translation,Community,Utopia’,inLawrenceVenuti(ed.)The

TranslationStudiesReader,London:Routledge,468–88.

——(2000b)‘1990s’,inLawrenceVenuti(ed.)TheTranslationStudies

Reader,NewYork&London:Routledge,333–42.

——(2003)‘Retranslations:TheCreationofValue’,BucknellReview47(1):

25–38.

——(ed.)(2004)TheTranslationStudiesReader,London&NewYork:

Routledge.

Verdonk,Peter(2002)Stylistics,Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.

Vermeer,Hans(1978)‘EinRahemfüreineAllgemeineTranslationstherie’,

LebendeSprachen3:99–102.

——(1983a)‘TranslationTheoryandLingusitics’,inP.Roinila,R.Orfanos

andSonjaTirkkonenCondit(eds)Näkökohtiakäänämisentutkimuksesta,

Joensuu:UniversityofJoensuu,1–10.

——(1983b)AufsätzezurTranslationstheorie,Heidelberg.

——(1986)‘Übersetzenalskulturellertransfer’,inMarySnellHornby(ed.)

Übersetzungswissenschaft–eineNeuorientierung,Tübingen:Francke,30–

53.

——(1987)‘WhatDoesitMeantoTranslate?’,IndianJournalofApplied

Linguistics13:25–33.

——(1989a)SkoposundTranslationsauftrag,Heidelberg:Universität

Heidelberg.

——(1989b/2000)‘SkoposandCommissioninTranslationalAction’,in

AndrewChesterman(ed.)ReadingsinTranslationTheory,Helsinki:OyFinn

LecturaAb,173–87;reprintedinLawrenceVenuti(ed.)TheTranslation

StudiesReader,London&NewYork:Routledge,221–32.

——(1992)‘IsTranslationaLinguisticoraCulturalProcess?’,inMalcolm

Coulthard(ed.)StudiesinTranslation/EstudosinTradução,Ilhado

Desterro28:37–49.

——(1994)‘HermeneutikundÜbersetzung(swissenschaft)’,TEXTConText9

(3–4):161–82.

——(1996)ASkoposTheoryofTranslation(Someargumentsforand

against),Heidelberg:TEXTconTEXT.

Vernet,Juan(1978)Laculturahispanoárabeenorienteeoccidente,

Barcelona:Ariel.

Véronis,Jean(2000a)‘FromtheRosettaStonetotheInformationSociety:A

SurveyofParallelTextProcessing’,inJeanVéronis(ed.)ParallelText

Processing,Dordrecht,Boston&London:KluwerAcademicPublishers,1–

24.

Versteegh,Kees(1991)‘GreekTranslationsoftheQur’āninChristian

Polemics(NinthCenturya.d.)’,ZeitschriftderDeutschenMorgenlandischen

Gesellschaft141(1):52–68.

Vertovec,StevenandRobinCohen(eds)(2002)Conceiving

Cosmopolitanism:Theory,Context,andPractice,Oxford:Oxford

UniversityPress.

Vidal,Bernard(1991)‘Plurilinguismeettraduction.Levernaculairenoir

américain:

Page653

Liturgy,

http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccdds/documents/rc_con_ccdd

authenticam_en.html(accessedOctober2007).

Vega,M.A.(ed.)(1994)Textosclásicosdeteoríadelatraducción,

Madrid:Cátedra.

VehmasLehto,Inkeri(1989)QuasiCorrectness.ACriticalStudyof

FinnishTranslationsofRussianJournalisticTexts,Helsinki:Neuvostoliitto

Instituutti.

Venneberg,Ute(1980)‘ProblemsinTranslatingSeanO’Casey’sDramaJuno

andthePaycock’,inOrtrunZuber(ed.)TheLanguagesofTheatre.

ProblemsintheTranslationandTranspositionofDrama,Oxford:

PergamonPress,121–31.

Ventola,Eija(ed.)(2000)DiscourseandCommunity;DoingFunctional

Linguistics,Tübingen:GunterNarr.

Venuti,Lawrence(1986)‘TheTranslator’sInvisibility’,Criticism28:179–212.

——(1991)‘GenealogiesofTranslationTheory:Schleiermacher’,TTR4(2):

125–50.

——(ed.)(1992)RethinkingTranslation:Discourse,Subjectivity,

Ideology,London&NewYork:Routledge.

——(1995a)TheTranslator’sInvisibility,London&NewYork:Routledge.

——(1995b)‘Translation,Authorship,Copyright’,TheTranslator1(1):1–

24.

——(1996)‘Translation,Heterogeneity,Linguistics’,TTR9(1):91–115.

——(ed.)(1998a)TranslationandMinority,SpecialIssueofThe

Translator4(2).

——(1998b)TheScandalsofTranslation,London:Routledge.

——(2000a)‘Translation,Community,Utopia’,inLawrenceVenuti(ed.)The

TranslationStudiesReader,London:Routledge,468–88.

——(2000b)‘1990s’,inLawrenceVenuti(ed.)TheTranslationStudies

Reader,NewYork&London:Routledge,333–42.

——(2003)‘Retranslations:TheCreationofValue’,BucknellReview47(1):

25–38.

——(ed.)(2004)TheTranslationStudiesReader,London&NewYork:

Routledge.

Verdonk,Peter(2002)Stylistics,Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.

Vermeer,Hans(1978)‘EinRahemfüreineAllgemeineTranslationstherie’,

LebendeSprachen3:99–102.

——(1983a)‘TranslationTheoryandLingusitics’,inP.Roinila,R.Orfanos

andSonjaTirkkonenCondit(eds)Näkökohtiakäänämisentutkimuksesta,

Joensuu:UniversityofJoensuu,1–10.

——(1983b)AufsätzezurTranslationstheorie,Heidelberg.

——(1986)‘Übersetzenalskulturellertransfer’,inMarySnellHornby(ed.)

Übersetzungswissenschaft–eineNeuorientierung,Tübingen:Francke,30–

53.

——(1987)‘WhatDoesitMeantoTranslate?’,IndianJournalofApplied

Linguistics13:25–33.

——(1989a)SkoposundTranslationsauftrag,Heidelberg:Universität

Heidelberg.

——(1989b/2000)‘SkoposandCommissioninTranslationalAction’,in

AndrewChesterman(ed.)ReadingsinTranslationTheory,Helsinki:OyFinn

LecturaAb,173–87;reprintedinLawrenceVenuti(ed.)TheTranslation

StudiesReader,London&NewYork:Routledge,221–32.

——(1992)‘IsTranslationaLinguisticoraCulturalProcess?’,inMalcolm

Coulthard(ed.)StudiesinTranslation/EstudosinTradução,Ilhado

Desterro28:37–49.

——(1994)‘HermeneutikundÜbersetzung(swissenschaft)’,TEXTConText9

(3–4):161–82.

——(1996)ASkoposTheoryofTranslation(Someargumentsforand

against),Heidelberg:TEXTconTEXT.

Vernet,Juan(1978)Laculturahispanoárabeenorienteeoccidente,

Barcelona:Ariel.

Véronis,Jean(2000a)‘FromtheRosettaStonetotheInformationSociety:A

SurveyofParallelTextProcessing’,inJeanVéronis(ed.)ParallelText

Processing,Dordrecht,Boston&London:KluwerAcademicPublishers,1–

24.

Versteegh,Kees(1991)‘GreekTranslationsoftheQur’āninChristian

Polemics(NinthCenturya.d.)’,ZeitschriftderDeutschenMorgenlandischen

Gesellschaft141(1):52–68.

Vertovec,StevenandRobinCohen(eds)(2002)Conceiving

Cosmopolitanism:Theory,Context,andPractice,Oxford:Oxford

UniversityPress.

Vidal,Bernard(1991)‘Plurilinguismeettraduction.Levernaculairenoir

américain:

Page653

Liturgy,

http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccdds/documents/rc_con_ccdd

authenticam_en.html(accessedOctober2007).

Vega,M.A.(ed.)(1994)Textosclásicosdeteoríadelatraducción,

Madrid:Cátedra.

VehmasLehto,Inkeri(1989)QuasiCorrectness.ACriticalStudyof

FinnishTranslationsofRussianJournalisticTexts,Helsinki:Neuvostoliitto

Instituutti.

Venneberg,Ute(1980)‘ProblemsinTranslatingSeanO’Casey’sDramaJuno

andthePaycock’,inOrtrunZuber(ed.)TheLanguagesofTheatre.

ProblemsintheTranslationandTranspositionofDrama,Oxford:

PergamonPress,121–31.

Ventola,Eija(ed.)(2000)DiscourseandCommunity;DoingFunctional

Linguistics,Tübingen:GunterNarr.

Venuti,Lawrence(1986)‘TheTranslator’sInvisibility’,Criticism28:179–212.

——(1991)‘GenealogiesofTranslationTheory:Schleiermacher’,TTR4(2):

125–50.

——(ed.)(1992)RethinkingTranslation:Discourse,Subjectivity,

Ideology,London&NewYork:Routledge.

——(1995a)TheTranslator’sInvisibility,London&NewYork:Routledge.

——(1995b)‘Translation,Authorship,Copyright’,TheTranslator1(1):1–

24.

——(1996)‘Translation,Heterogeneity,Linguistics’,TTR9(1):91–115.

——(ed.)(1998a)TranslationandMinority,SpecialIssueofThe

Translator4(2).

——(1998b)TheScandalsofTranslation,London:Routledge.

——(2000a)‘Translation,Community,Utopia’,inLawrenceVenuti(ed.)The

TranslationStudiesReader,London:Routledge,468–88.

——(2000b)‘1990s’,inLawrenceVenuti(ed.)TheTranslationStudies

Reader,NewYork&London:Routledge,333–42.

——(2003)‘Retranslations:TheCreationofValue’,BucknellReview47(1):

25–38.

——(ed.)(2004)TheTranslationStudiesReader,London&NewYork:

Routledge.

Verdonk,Peter(2002)Stylistics,Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.

Vermeer,Hans(1978)‘EinRahemfüreineAllgemeineTranslationstherie’,

LebendeSprachen3:99–102.

——(1983a)‘TranslationTheoryandLingusitics’,inP.Roinila,R.Orfanos

andSonjaTirkkonenCondit(eds)Näkökohtiakäänämisentutkimuksesta,

Joensuu:UniversityofJoensuu,1–10.

——(1983b)AufsätzezurTranslationstheorie,Heidelberg.

——(1986)‘Übersetzenalskulturellertransfer’,inMarySnellHornby(ed.)

Übersetzungswissenschaft–eineNeuorientierung,Tübingen:Francke,30–

53.

——(1987)‘WhatDoesitMeantoTranslate?’,IndianJournalofApplied

Linguistics13:25–33.

——(1989a)SkoposundTranslationsauftrag,Heidelberg:Universität

Heidelberg.

——(1989b/2000)‘SkoposandCommissioninTranslationalAction’,in

AndrewChesterman(ed.)ReadingsinTranslationTheory,Helsinki:OyFinn

LecturaAb,173–87;reprintedinLawrenceVenuti(ed.)TheTranslation

StudiesReader,London&NewYork:Routledge,221–32.

——(1992)‘IsTranslationaLinguisticoraCulturalProcess?’,inMalcolm

Coulthard(ed.)StudiesinTranslation/EstudosinTradução,Ilhado

Desterro28:37–49.

——(1994)‘HermeneutikundÜbersetzung(swissenschaft)’,TEXTConText9

(3–4):161–82.

——(1996)ASkoposTheoryofTranslation(Someargumentsforand

against),Heidelberg:TEXTconTEXT.

Vernet,Juan(1978)Laculturahispanoárabeenorienteeoccidente,

Barcelona:Ariel.

Véronis,Jean(2000a)‘FromtheRosettaStonetotheInformationSociety:A

SurveyofParallelTextProcessing’,inJeanVéronis(ed.)ParallelText

Processing,Dordrecht,Boston&London:KluwerAcademicPublishers,1–

24.

Versteegh,Kees(1991)‘GreekTranslationsoftheQur’āninChristian

Polemics(NinthCenturya.d.)’,ZeitschriftderDeutschenMorgenlandischen

Gesellschaft141(1):52–68.

Vertovec,StevenandRobinCohen(eds)(2002)Conceiving

Cosmopolitanism:Theory,Context,andPractice,Oxford:Oxford

UniversityPress.

Vidal,Bernard(1991)‘Plurilinguismeettraduction.Levernaculairenoir

américain:

Page654

enjeux,réalité,réceptionàproposdeTheSoundandtheFury’,TTR4(2):

151–88.

Vieira,ElseR.P.(1999)‘LiberatingCalibans:ReadingsofAntropofagiaand

HaroldodeCampos’PoeticsofTranscreation’,inSusanBassnettandHarish

Trivedi(eds)PostcolonialTranslation:TheoryandPractice,London&

NewYork:Routledge,95–113.

Vienne,Jean(1994)‘TowardsaPedagogyof“TranslationinSituation”’,

Perspectives:StudiesinTranslatology2(1):51–9.

——(2000)‘WhichCompetencesShouldWeTeachtoFutureTranslators,

andHow?’,inChristinaSchäffnerandBeverlyAdab(eds)Developing

TranslationCompetence,Amsterdam&Philadelphia:JohnBenjamins,91–

100.

Vilikovský,Ján(1984)Prekladakotvorba,Bratislava:Slovenskýspisovateĺ.

——(1988)‘TranslationandTranslationCriticism–theElusiveCriteria’,in

PaulNekeman(ed.)Translation,OurFuture/LaTraduction,notreavenir.

XIthWorldCongressofFIT/XIeCongrèsMondialdelaFIT,Maastricht:

Euroterm,72–8.

Vinay,J.P.(1975)‘Regardssurl’évolutiondesthéoriesdelatraduction

depuisvingtans’,Meta20(1):7–27.

——andJeanDarbelnet(1958)Stylistiquecomparéedufrançaisetde

l’anglais,Paris:Didier.

——(1995)ComparativeStylisticsofFrenchandEnglish:AMethodology

forTranslation ,translatedandeditedbyJuanC.SagerandMarieJosé

Hamel,Amsterdam:JohnBenjamins.

Vissac,J.A.([1862]1971)DelapoésielatineenFrance,Geneva:Slatkine.

Voigts,L.E.(1989)‘ScientificandMedicalBooks’,inGriffithsandPearsall

(eds),345–402.

Voldeng,Evelyne(1984)‘TransLataLatus’,trans.FrancesMorgan,Tessera

8(4):82–96.

vonFlotow,Luise(1991)‘FeministTranslation:Contexts,Practicesand

Theories’,TTR4(2):69–84.

——(1997)TranslationandGender:Translatinginthe‘Eraof

Feminism’,Manchester:StJerome.

——(1998)‘DisUnityandDiversity:FeministApproachestoTranslation

Studies’,inLynneBowker,MichaelCronin,DorothyKennyandJennifer

Pearson(eds)UnityinDiversity?CurrentTrendsinTranslationStudies,

Manchester:StJerome,3–13.

——(2000a)‘TranslationEffects:HowBeauvoirTalksAboutSexinEnglish’,

inMelanieHawthorne(ed.)ContingentLoves.SimonedeBeauvoirand

Sexuality,Richmond,VA:VirginiaUniversityPress,13–33.

——(2000b)‘Women,Bibles,Ideologies’,TTR13(1):9–20.

——(ed.)(2000c)Idéologieettraduction/TranslationandIdeology,

SpecialIssueofTTR13(1).

——(2002)‘JuliaEvelinaSmith,traductricedelaBible:Doingmorethanany

manhaseverdone’,inJeanDelisle(ed.)Portraitsdetraductrices,291–320.

——(2004)‘SacrificingSensetoSound:MimeticTranslationandFeminist

Writing’,inKatharinaFaull(ed.)TranslationandCulture,Specialissueof

BucknellReview2:91–106.

——andAgathaSchwartz(eds)(2006)TheThirdShore.ShortFictionby

ContemporaryWomenWritersfromEast/CentralEurope,Northwestern

UniversityPress.

vonSchwerinHigh,Friederike(2004)Shakespeare,Receptionand

Translation,London&NewYork:Continuum.

vonWright,G.(1971)ExplanationandUnderstanding,London:Routledge

&KeganPaul.

Vuorikoski,AnnaRiitta(2004)AVoiceofitsCitizensoraModernTower

ofBabel:TheQualityofInterpretingasaFunctionofPoliticalRhetoricin

theEuropeanParliament,Doctoraldissertation,Tampere,Finland:University

ofTampere.

Waddington,Christopher(1999)Estudiocomparativodediferentes

métodosdeevaluacióndetraduccióngeneral(inglésespañol),Madrid:

UniversidadPontificiaComillas.

Wadensjö,Cecilia(1992)InterpretingasInteraction:OnDialogue

InterpretinginImmigrationHearingsandMedicalEncounters,Linköping

StudiesinArtsandScience83,Linköping:DepartmentofCommunication

Studies.

——(1998)InterpretingasInteraction,London&NewYork:Longman.

——(2000)‘CoconstructingYeltsin–ExplorationsofanInterpreter

MediatedPoliticalInterview’,inMaeveOlohan(ed.)InterculturalFaultlines.

ResearchModelsin

Page654

enjeux,réalité,réceptionàproposdeTheSoundandtheFury’,TTR4(2):

151–88.

Vieira,ElseR.P.(1999)‘LiberatingCalibans:ReadingsofAntropofagiaand

HaroldodeCampos’PoeticsofTranscreation’,inSusanBassnettandHarish

Trivedi(eds)PostcolonialTranslation:TheoryandPractice,London&

NewYork:Routledge,95–113.

Vienne,Jean(1994)‘TowardsaPedagogyof“TranslationinSituation”’,

Perspectives:StudiesinTranslatology2(1):51–9.

——(2000)‘WhichCompetencesShouldWeTeachtoFutureTranslators,

andHow?’,inChristinaSchäffnerandBeverlyAdab(eds)Developing

TranslationCompetence,Amsterdam&Philadelphia:JohnBenjamins,91–

100.

Vilikovský,Ján(1984)Prekladakotvorba,Bratislava:Slovenskýspisovateĺ.

——(1988)‘TranslationandTranslationCriticism–theElusiveCriteria’,in

PaulNekeman(ed.)Translation,OurFuture/LaTraduction,notreavenir.

XIthWorldCongressofFIT/XIeCongrèsMondialdelaFIT,Maastricht:

Euroterm,72–8.

Vinay,J.P.(1975)‘Regardssurl’évolutiondesthéoriesdelatraduction

depuisvingtans’,Meta20(1):7–27.

——andJeanDarbelnet(1958)Stylistiquecomparéedufrançaisetde

l’anglais,Paris:Didier.

——(1995)ComparativeStylisticsofFrenchandEnglish:AMethodology

forTranslation ,translatedandeditedbyJuanC.SagerandMarieJosé

Hamel,Amsterdam:JohnBenjamins.

Vissac,J.A.([1862]1971)DelapoésielatineenFrance,Geneva:Slatkine.

Voigts,L.E.(1989)‘ScientificandMedicalBooks’,inGriffithsandPearsall

(eds),345–402.

Voldeng,Evelyne(1984)‘TransLataLatus’,trans.FrancesMorgan,Tessera

8(4):82–96.

vonFlotow,Luise(1991)‘FeministTranslation:Contexts,Practicesand

Theories’,TTR4(2):69–84.

——(1997)TranslationandGender:Translatinginthe‘Eraof

Feminism’,Manchester:StJerome.

——(1998)‘DisUnityandDiversity:FeministApproachestoTranslation

Studies’,inLynneBowker,MichaelCronin,DorothyKennyandJennifer

Pearson(eds)UnityinDiversity?CurrentTrendsinTranslationStudies,

Manchester:StJerome,3–13.

——(2000a)‘TranslationEffects:HowBeauvoirTalksAboutSexinEnglish’,

inMelanieHawthorne(ed.)ContingentLoves.SimonedeBeauvoirand

Sexuality,Richmond,VA:VirginiaUniversityPress,13–33.

——(2000b)‘Women,Bibles,Ideologies’,TTR13(1):9–20.

——(ed.)(2000c)Idéologieettraduction/TranslationandIdeology,

SpecialIssueofTTR13(1).

——(2002)‘JuliaEvelinaSmith,traductricedelaBible:Doingmorethanany

manhaseverdone’,inJeanDelisle(ed.)Portraitsdetraductrices,291–320.

——(2004)‘SacrificingSensetoSound:MimeticTranslationandFeminist

Writing’,inKatharinaFaull(ed.)TranslationandCulture,Specialissueof

BucknellReview2:91–106.

——andAgathaSchwartz(eds)(2006)TheThirdShore.ShortFictionby

ContemporaryWomenWritersfromEast/CentralEurope,Northwestern

UniversityPress.

vonSchwerinHigh,Friederike(2004)Shakespeare,Receptionand

Translation,London&NewYork:Continuum.

vonWright,G.(1971)ExplanationandUnderstanding,London:Routledge

&KeganPaul.

Vuorikoski,AnnaRiitta(2004)AVoiceofitsCitizensoraModernTower

ofBabel:TheQualityofInterpretingasaFunctionofPoliticalRhetoricin

theEuropeanParliament,Doctoraldissertation,Tampere,Finland:University

ofTampere.

Waddington,Christopher(1999)Estudiocomparativodediferentes

métodosdeevaluacióndetraduccióngeneral(inglésespañol),Madrid:

UniversidadPontificiaComillas.

Wadensjö,Cecilia(1992)InterpretingasInteraction:OnDialogue

InterpretinginImmigrationHearingsandMedicalEncounters,Linköping

StudiesinArtsandScience83,Linköping:DepartmentofCommunication

Studies.

——(1998)InterpretingasInteraction,London&NewYork:Longman.

——(2000)‘CoconstructingYeltsin–ExplorationsofanInterpreter

MediatedPoliticalInterview’,inMaeveOlohan(ed.)InterculturalFaultlines.

ResearchModelsin

Mona Baker &amp; Gabriela Saldanha. Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies (2nd edition)

Подождите немного. Документ загружается.

Mona Baker & Gabriela Saldanha. Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies (2nd edition)