The half-life of this type of second-order reaction can be determined by assum-
ing that the concentration of A at some time, t, is equal to one-half the initial con-
centration ([A]
t
= 0.5[A]
0
). Simplifying the equation gives
t
1/2
=
1
k[A]
0
The half-life for a second-order reaction (involving only one compound in the rate
law) is inversely dependent on the initial concentration of the reactant. Smaller ini-
tial concentrations of the reactant will mean a longer half-life for the reaction.
If the second-order reaction contains two species in the rate law, the inte-
grated rate law becomes much more complicated. In fact, the math gets so com-
plicated that chemists typically manipulate the experimental conditions to reduce
the amount of calculation. Consider the reaction of one of the components of
smog with ozone:
NO(g) + O
3
(g) n NO
2
(g) + O
2
(g)
Rate = k[NO][O
3
]
The reaction is first order in NO, first order in O
3
, and second order overall.
To calculate the concentration of a reactant, determine the rate constant, or
find the time required to reach a certain concentration with this type of rate law,
we conduct the reaction with a relatively small concentration of one of the reac-
tants and a very large concentration of the other.
What effect does this have on the
rate law?
Because one of the concentrations is very large, any change in its con-
centration is negligible, and we can assume that its concentration remains constant
through the course of the reaction. An analogy is having someone who is rich spend
$1 in a day (decreasing to 50 cents after one half-life!) from a fortune of $1 bil-
lion. The change is hardly noticeable. The fortune is essentially constant.
Someone who had only $10, however, would notice the effect of spending $1 im-
mediately. Having the concentration of one component much larger than that of
the other reduces the rate law to a much simpler form. For example, if we per-
form the reaction with 0.100 M NO and 0.001 M O
3
, the concentrations of the
species after the reaction is complete can be determined:
[O
3
]
f
= 0.001 M − 0.001 M = 0.000 M
[NO]
f
= 0.100 M − 0.001 M = 0.099 M ≈ 0.100 M
The O
3
is consumed in the reaction, but the concentration of NO is only slightly
affected. We can make the assumption that the concentration doesn’t change.
Because the final concentration of NO has essentially remained constant, it can
be combined with the rate constant.And the rate equation for the reaction can be
reduced to
Rate = k [NO][O
3
] = k [NO]
0
[O
3
]
and, because k = k [NO],
Rate = k [O
3
]
where k is the new rate constant. What is the order of our new rate law? Because
of our choice of the initial concentrations, the kinetics for this reaction has taken
on the form of a first-order rate law. Because of our modification, we say that this
is a
pseudo-first-order rate equation.
We can do this manipulation with any reaction. By increasing the concentra-
tion of a particular reactant to a very large value, any order of a rate law can be
simplified to a pseudo-first order rate equation. This enables us to study reactions
no matter what order they appear to be. We must remember, however, that any
modification of the rate equation means that the new rate constant is not the
same rate constant as in the original reaction.
640 Chapter 15 Chemical Kinetics