142 Chapter 4 Solution Stoichiometry and Types of Reactions
Water is such a precious resource that
countries have been known to threaten
one another with war over water rights. In the United
States, individual states quarrel and even sue each other
over access to fresh water. For example, Nebraska and
Kansas have fought for decades over who owns the water
that flows from Colorado through Nebraska and into
Kansas via the Republican River.
We are so used to thinking of water as essential and
beneficial that it is easy to overlook the many chemical
situations in which too much water can be very undesir-
able. What would be the effect of too much water in the
Republican River? On a smaller scale, what would be the
effect of too much water in a chocolate bar or potato
chips? Canned cooking fats and oils certainly do not
benefit from the presence of water; and there are limits
to the amount of water that can be in pharmaceutical
products that are ingested as tablets, gelcaps, and caplets.
Therefore, it is important to be able to determine how
much water is present in samples of foods, medicines,
and other industrial products, even if the quantities of
water involved are very small.
One chemical method
used to quantify the water
content of a wide range of
samples, such as chewing
gum, jelly beans, and peanuts,
is the Karl Fischer titration,
named after the scientist who
devised the basic method in
1935. The Karl Fischer titra-
tion makes use of the reaction
of iodine (I
2
) with the water in
the sample being analyzed.
The reaction is performed in
the presence of organic
solvents such as pyridine
(C
5
H
5
N) and methanol
(CH
3
OH). The precise details
of the chemical reaction are
quite complex, to the extent that even now, more than 70
years after the method was first developed, the exact
processes involved in the reaction are still the subject of
research. We can summarize it, however, as follows:
(Reactants) +I
2
+ H
2
O → (products)
The chemical details vary with the actual method used.
In all cases, however, the crucial quantitative fact that al-
lows the water content to be measured is that the iodine
and water always react in a known mole ratio, which is 1:1
in the case shown above. The end point of the titration,
when we can tell that all the water has been consumed, is
How do we know?
How to test for small amounts of water
The Republican River supplies Harlan County Reservoir with water
used for irrigation and recreation.
Hot oil spatters violently
when water, such as that
on the surface of this
turkey, is present.
FIGURE 4.14
Automated Fischer titration
apparatus.
marked by a distinctive color change, which enables us
to determine the quantity of iodine required to achieve
that color change. The amount of water that must
have reacted with that quantity of iodine can then be
calculated.
Modern laboratory instrumentation has allowed
the titration process to be automated, as shown in
Figure 4.14. Instead of direct observation of a color
change, the automated instruments may rely on mea-
surement of a flow of electrons to excess iodine as soon
as all the water has reacted. This flow of electrons is due
to the process I
2
+ 2e
−
→ 2I
−
. Another option is to use
the reversal of the process shown above—namely
2I
−
→ I
2
+ 2e
−
—to generate the iodine needed to react
with the water.
The details vary depending on the machines used,
but automated Karl Fischer titrations allow accurate de-
termination of the water content in tiny samples con-
taining hardly any water at all. What do we mean by
“hardly any” and “tiny”? The method is useful down to
the level of 50 ppm water in a sample that can have a
volume as small as 10 microliters.