Further Insights
In questions like this, the identity of the solute is irrelevant provided we are dealing
with moles, rather than masses. For example, the answer we obtained for the volume
of 0.150 M ethanol containing 12.5 moles of ethanol would be equally valid for the
volume of a 0.150 M solution of glucose containing 12.5 moles of glucose. Both re-
quire a volume of 83.3 L. In a similar way, if we were asked to calculate the number
of moles of a compound in a given volume of solution, we would not need to know
the identity of the compound if we were given the molarity of the solution. How-
ever, if we were asked about specific numbers of moles of ions of a strong electrolyte, we
would need the formula of the compound to determine the number of times the
ions or atoms appear in the formula.
PRACTICE 4.3
a. What volume of a 3.40 M solution of copper sulfate will contain 4.76 moles of
copper sulfate?
b. What volume of a 2.25 M solution of Ca(NO
3
)
2
will contain 5.5 moles of
calcium nitrate? What volume will contain 5.5 moles of nitrate ions?
See Problems 18, 21, and 22–24.
Parts per Million, Parts per Billion, and so on
Drinking water standards, which indicate the maximum permissible level of
harmful contaminants in the water that we consume, are dictated in the United
States by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Other countries have their
own agencies responsible for water standards, such as La Secretaría de Medio
Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMERNAT, The Federal Agency of the Envi-
ronment and Natural Resources) in Mexico. If water in the United States has
more than these maximum levels, the EPA declares it unsafe to drink. For exam-
ple, as of January 23, 2006, the maximum allowed level of arsenic in drinking
water is 1.3 × 10
−7
M. We can use molarity to discuss the concentrations of pol-
lutants such as arsenic, but the resulting numbers are, in many cases, very small.
When the concentrations get this small, we often find it easier to use an alterna-
tive measure of concentration. Specifically, we can talk about the concentration
of arsenic in terms of
parts per million (ppm),or parts per billion (ppb),or even
parts per trillion (ppt).
We are already familiar with the related, but larger, unit “percent.” What does
percent mean? In a compound that is “1 percent nitrogen by mass,” the nitrogen
contributes 1 gram out of every 100 grams to the total mass. In the
same way, a level of one part per million (1 ppm), means the chem-
ical contributes 1 gram out of every million grams of the total mass.
Similarly, one part per billion (1 ppb) corresponds to a level of
1 gram out of every billion grams of the total. One part per trillion
(ppt) corresponds to 1 gram out of every trillion grams.
These concentration units correspond to very small levels in-
deed. We can get an idea of exactly how small from the following
approximate comparisons, as illustrated in Figure 4.10:
■
One part per million is roughly equivalent to a drop of ink in a
12-gallon bucket of water.
■
One part per billion is roughly equivalent to a drop of ink in a
large tanker truck full of water.
■
One part per trillion is roughly equivalent to a drop of ink in a
12-million-gallon reservoir of water.
4.2 The Concentration of Solutions 135
Application
C
HEMICAL
ENCOUNTERS:
Maximum Levels
of Chemicals in
Drinking Water
An environmental chemist sampling the
water in a river.