
582
RIVERS AND ALLUVIAI. FANS
counterparts in modern channel dimensions, for many
seif-
formed single channels have width:mean depth ratios of less
than 20. with progressively fewer with ratios up to 100 and
above. Large braided rivers and braidplains may have
width;depth ratios of several hundred and upward. Krynine
also suggested divisions in terms of stratal area. No upper limit
has been placed on sheets which, in the case of widespread
flood layers and braided-fluvial sheets, can have very high
aspect ratios, as noted earlier. This geometric classification is
independent of scale, and can apply equally to seour fills a few-
decimeters and valley tills that are several kilometers thick.
Dimensional divisions become more difficult to apply where
fluvial bodies are stacked to great thicknesses without
intervening extra-channel strata, as in some alluvial fan
deposits localized at basin margins and basinwide braided-
fluvial formations. Sediment accumulation as levees and
erevasse splays on channel margins can result in channel fills
with central bodies and marginal
wing.'i.
As noted by Friend (i983), braided and meandering rivers
tend to have tnohile channel belts that migrate laterally, and
generate widespread sheets of gravel and sand. The sheets may
contain discrete channel fills of ribbon form that represent the
fills of confluences, anabranches, and localized scours that
were cut and filled rapidly. In contrast, channels in cohesive
fine-grained material can be categorized
'^s
fixed channels that
are laterally stable between episodes of abrupt switching and
generate bodies in Ihe fbrm of ribbons and narrow sheets.
These represent an initial channel fbrm. perhaps widened
slightly through time by bank migration. A third category is
sheetflood deposits with very extensive sediment sheets that
represent poorly channelised settings.
Where floodplains aggrade rapidly, typically due to rapid
subsidence or sea-level rise, channel bodies tend to form
ribbons or narrow sheets that are encased in floodpiain fines
and poorly connected. In contrast, where floodplains aggrade
slowly, rivers tend to migrate laterally and rework their
alluvium, resulting in sheets of well connected channel bodies.
Growth of peat domes can restrict channel migration and
promote thick ribbon bodies. Thus, channel-body geometry
commonly represents an interplay between initial channel
form, aggradation rates of channel and floodplain sediments,
and the rate of lateral ehannel expansion through sediment of
varied consistency. Avulsion patterns have an important
influence on channel body form, as avulsing ehannels can
ereate new courses or can reoccupy pre-existing courses, thus
promoting the generation of stacked, multistory bodies (Jones
and Schumm, V)99: Kraus and Wells. 1999) . There is no
unique relationship between ehannel planform and 3D
channel-body fbrm. because the f^inal form usually represents
the evolution of one or more ehannels over a prolonged
period, during which the channels migrate and avulse laterally
and aggrade vertically. Commonly, however, fluvial processes
and alluvial faeies are related to the four dominant river
patterns of straight, meandering, braided, and anabranehing,
and to the two dominant terminal depositional systems, fans,
and deltas.
A descriptive framework fbr studying the geometry of
alluvial bodies was outlined by Miall (1996). This framework
involves the use of facies codes fbr sediment types, recognition
of bounding surfaces with a hierarchical order (from bed
boundaries to major valley bases), and the identification of
architectural elements that are characteristic of many fluvial
systems- The latter include sediment gravity sheets, sandy
bedfbrm sheets, downstream, and laterally accreting elements,
laminated sand sheets, and overbank fines, as well as bodies
with distinctive channel fbrm. The combination of these
elements and bounding surfaces can be used to present an
objective view of the channel body.
Gerald C. Nanson and Martin R. Gibling
Bibliography
Allen. J.R.L.. 1970. Studies in fluviatifc sedimentation: a comparison
of fining-upuard cycloihems. with special reference to coarse-
nicinbcr composition iuid interpretation, .hnirmtl of Sedimcittorv
Pcirolo^v. 40: 298-32.\
Aslnnore. P.C. 1991. Hou do gravei-bed rivers braid.' Canadian
Jmmutiof Earth Sciences. 28:
.'126-341.
Bcttess. R.. and White. W.R.. 1983. Meandering and braiding of
alluvitil cliannels. Proceedingsofihe Institution of
Civil
Engineers. 75:
325-538.
Blair. T.C. and McPlicrson. J.G.. 1994. Alluvial Tans and Ilieir natural
disiinction from rivers based on morphology, liydratilic processes,
sedimentary processes, and faeies assembfages. JourntilofSedinicii-
lary Rcmiirli. A64: 450 489.
Blum. M.D., and Tornqvist. T.E.. 2()()t). I-Uivial responses to climate
and sea-level etiange: ii review and look forward. Scilinwiitnlo^v.
47:
2-48.
Brierley. G.J.. and Hiekin. E.J.. 1991. Channel planform as a non-
eoniroHing factor In fluvial sedimentology: tfie case of ihe
Squamisli River floodplain. Brilisli Columbia. Seilinieiitiirv Geol-
ogy. 75: 67 S3.
Brotherion. D.I.. 1979. On the origin and eharacterislics of river
channel patterns, .loiirnatoj llyilrohi^y. 44: 211 -230.
Churefi. M., 1992. Channel morphology and typology. In Calow. P..
and Petts. G.E. (cds.l. The Rivers Haiidhook: Hydrological and
Eco-
higicilPrinciples. Blaekwell. pp. 126-143.
Dalrymple, R.W.. Zaillm, B.A.. and Boyd. R.. 1992. Estuarine faeies
models: eonceptnal basis and straiigraphie implications. Journalof
.Scdiniomirv Petrology. 62: 1130 1146.
DeCelles. P.O.. Gray. M.B.. Ridgway. K.D.. Cole, R.B.. Pivnik, D.A.,
Peqiiera. N.. and Srivaslava. P.. 1991. Controls on syn orogenic
alkivial-fiin archilceture. Bearlooth Conglomerate (Palaeocene).
Wyoming, and Montana. Sedinwritology. 38: 567-590.
Fisk. H.N.. 1944. Geologieal investigation of the ailuvial valley of the
lower Mississippi River Vieksburg. Mississippi River Commission.
78 pp.
Tricnd. P.F.. 1983. Towards the field classitication of alhivial
arehitectiire or seqtienee. In Collinson. J.D.. and Lewin. J. (eds.).
Modern aiul Ancient Elinlal
Sv.\icni.\.
International Association of
Sedimentologists. Special Publication. 6. pp. 345-354.
Friend. P.F.. and Sinha, R., 1993. Braiding and meandering
parameters. In Best. J.L.. and Bri.stow. C.D. (eds.). Braided Rivers.
Geological Society of London. Special Publication. 75. pp. 105-
III.
Gibling. M.R., Nanson, G.C. and Maroulis, J.C, 1998. Anastomos-
ing river sedimentation in the Channel Country of Centra!
Australia. Sedinicntohigy. 45: 595-619.
Gilbert. G.K.. 1877. Report on the geology of the Henry Mountains.
llnited States Geological Survey. Roeky Mountain Region,
Washington. DC
Hiekin. E.J.. and Nanson. G.C. 1975. The character of channel
migration on the Beatton River, north-east British Columbia.
Canada. Gfological Society of Aim-rica Bidletin. 86: 487-494.
Horton. R.E.. 1945. Erosional development of streams and their
drainage basins: hydropliysical approach to quantitative morphol-
ogy. Geological.Society of
.Aincrii
a Bidlfiin. 56: 275 370.
Huang. H.Q.. and Nanson. G.C. 2000. Hydraulic geometry and
maximum How efficiency as producls of the principle of least
action. Earth Sioiace
Processes
and
luiiidform.s.
25: 1- 16.
Jones.
L.S., atid Sehumm. S.A., 1999. Causes of avulsion: an overview.
In Smith. N.D.. and Rogers. J. (eds.). Eluvial Sedimentology \'I.
International Association ofSedimentoloaists. Special Publieation,
28.
pp. 171-178.