174
III,§1,2-III,§1,3
dx
_ dR
_ d'Y
_ d) _ _ dQ
dL = dM = 0
Hp(x, p) RHQ[L, M, Q, R] HL HM
RHR'
and thus (2.14), by (2.6) and (2.12).
Proof of 4°). Formula (1.17) can be written
d 3x n d3 p= dL n dM n dH n
dR
n d(l) n d'Y,
RHQ
where, for H = 0,
dR
= dt mod(dL, dM)
RHQ
by (2.14); hence (2.15) holds, the following meaning being given to its
left member:
d3x A dap
dH
1W
denotes the restriction ww to W of any form w of degree 5 such that
dH A m = d 3 x A d 3 p ; ww is clearly independent of the choice of w.
3. The Quantized Tori T(1, m, n) Characterizing Solutions, Defined
mod(1/v) on Compact Manifolds, of the Lagrangian System
2)
1 .1)
aU=(aL=-LoU=(aM-Mo)U=O mod
(3.1)
v
a, aL2, and ay denote the lagrangian operators associated, respectively, to
the hamiltonians
H, L2, M,
which are in involution; Lo and MO are two real constants such that
IM0I < Lo.
From theorem 7.1 of II,§3, solutions of this system are lagrangianfunc-
tions U with constant lagrangian amplitude, defined mod(1%v) on those
manifolds V[L0, M0] defined by (2.4), whether compact or not, that
satisfy Maslov's quantum condition (II,§3, definition 6.2). V[L0, M0] is
chosen to be connected. The measure nv on V, which is invariant under
the characteristic vectors of H, L2 - Lo, and M - M0, and which serves
to define the lagrangian amplitude, is