data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2a3c/f2a3ce8ffec2145ca9bec90eba1f42f56dc1597b" alt=""
loaded Volume
V.
This is a consequence of brittle
failure from sparsly distributed flaws [9, 101 (it is more
likely to find large flaws in large than in small
volumes).
In order to take into account for a inhomogenous
and multiaxiale stress state, a suitable multiaxial failure
criterion (resulting in an equivalent stress,
oe)
and the
effectively loaded volume have to be defined (for details
see [6, 81 and the literature therein). In the following the
maximum principle stress is used in place of the
equivalent stress and the effective volume is given by:
Using a method for numerical integration, the
so
called Gaussian quadratur
[
1 11, the effective volume can
be calculated from the FE model. Fig. 10 shows the
relationship between the effective volume and the
Weibull modulus for the point loading case, an older
analytical approximation found in the literature
[
121 (it
describes also the point loading case) and the used
modified BDT configuration. Of course the effective
volume goes to zero if the Weibull modulus goes to
infinity (indicating no data scatter; then the fracture
origin must start in the maximale loaded volume
element). The reduction of the effective volume in the
tests made with a curved support compared with the
point loading case reflects the fact that the tensile
loaded volume is significantly reduced if a sample is
loaded on curved supports.
This
can qualitatively also
be seen by comparison of Figs.7.a and 7.c.
poln
load:
-=rvtical(Neergaard)
-flatSuppott(FE)
Wruppoct
-
R=10,5mm
I
s
5%
I
>
.-
modul
m
Fig. 10: Ratio of the effective volume Vcfand of the
disc volume as a function of the Weibull modulus.
Shown are different approximations.
In general (as shown e.g. for some structural ceramics
[6, 7, 8, 13, 141) a proper comparison of BDT- and
bending test data necessitates to take into account for
the different effective volumes in both kinds of testing
(the effective volume in BD testing is about ten times
higher than that of the mini bending samples; a Weibull
extrapolation of strength for m=17 and V,lV2=10 would
result in an 15% increase in the bending strength). But
for the investigated material no influence of volume
under load on strength has been observed within the
experimental scatter
[
13, 141 and the comparison of data
as made in table 2 seems to be fair. This behaviour is
yet not fully understood and still matter of
investigations.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank EPCOS AG/Deutschlandsberg
(Austria) for supplying samples, and acknowledge the
collaboration of I. Hahn (SIEMENSMunich), J. Riedler
and G. Schoner (EPCOS) for providing some of the
requested material data and the helpful discussions on
related topics. This work was supported by the Austrian
Kplus-program.
REFERENCES
(1) B. W. Darvell, Uniaxial compression tests and the
validity of indirect tensile strength, J. Mat. Sci., 25,
(2) A. Briickner-Foit, T. Fett,
D.
Mum, Discrimination
of Multiaxiality Criteria with the Brazilian Disc
Test, J. Eur. Cer. SOC., 17, (1997) 689
-
696
(3) R.H. Marion, K.J. Johnstone, A Parametric Study
of the Diametral Compression Test for Ceramics,
Cer. Bull., 56, (1977) 998
-
1002
(4) U. Soltesz,
G.
Bernauer, R. Schafer,
Spaltzugversuchs-Eignung
zur Zugfestigkeits-
Ermittlung sprodbrechender Materialien,
Fachberichte DKG, 72, (1995) 553
-
555
druckversuches fur keramische Materialien,
Diplomarbeit an der Montanuniversitat Leoben,
Austria,
(
1999)
(6) D. Munz, T. Fett, Ceramics Mechanical Properties,
Failure Behaviour, Materials Selection; Springer
Verlag, Berlin, Germany, (1999)
(7) T. Lube, M. Manner, R, Danzer, The
Miniaturisation of the 4-point bend Test. J. Fatigue
Fract. Engng. Mater. Struct., 20, (1 997) 1605- 16 16
(8) D. Rubesa, R. Darner; The Pecularities of
Designing with Brittle Materials-Weak Point and
Deficiencies, Proc. of the 12'h Bienniel Conference
on Fracture
-
ECF 12, EMAS Publishing, West
Midlands, Sheffield,
U.K,
(1
998)
(9) R. Darner; Ceramics: Mechanical Performance and
Lifetime Prediction; Encyclopedia of Advanced
Materials;
1,
Oxford, (1994) 358-398
(10)R. Darner, A general strength distribution function
for brittle materials.
J.
Eur. Ceram. SOC. 10, (1992)
(1 l)A.
H.
Stroud and D. Secrest, Gaussian Quadrature
(1990) 757-780
(5) A. Borger, Optimierung des Scheiben-
46 1-472
Formulas, Prentice-Hall, Inc.. Englewood Cliffs.
N. J.,USA,
(1
969)
diametral compression, J. Mat. Sci., 3, (1997) 2529
(12)L.J. Neergaard; Effective volume of specimens in
-
2533
(13)R. Danzer, T. Lube, Fracture statistics of brittle
materials: It does not always have to be Weibull
statistics. Proc.
6'h
Int Symp. Ceramic materials and
components, Arita, Japan,
(
1998) 658-662
(14) R. Danzer, Mechanical behaviour and reliability of
Ceramics. in. P. Vincencini ed. gth Cimtec-World
Ceramics Congress, Faenza, Italy, (1999) 379-386
216