
THE FAMILY
Family Structure
Medieval and early modern Japanese society was hier-
archical. By the end of the 17th century, this hierar-
chy was divided, at least in the ideal, into four distinct
classes: samurai, peasant, artisan, and merchant. In
turn, this overarching hierarchical framework shaped
the composition of the family unit. Interclass mar-
riage was not legally permitted, thus forcing individu-
als to marry along socioeconomic lines. This
structure perpetuated the dominant hierarchical para-
digm, preventing individuals from attempting to
change their social and occupational status.
In both medieval and early modern Japan, the
basic family unit was the ie (house). While the ie tradi-
tionally consisted of a nuclear family, it typically
expanded to incorporate an assortment of other
members, including blood relatives, such as grand-
parents, and nonrelatives, such as servants and their
kin. In addition to being the foundational component
of social organization, the term ie also referred to
notions of family property, reputation, and the princi-
ple of continued familial succession. Typically, the
eldest son became the inheritor of the family. How-
ever, when there were no legitimate blood kin to
assume control, external heirs unrelated to the family
were often adopted into the household as successors
to carry on the family lineage. This ethos of genera-
tional continuity and heritage reflects the Confucian
influence on early modern Japanese culture. Particu-
larly during the Edo period, the upper classes adopted
the familial tenets of Confucianism, leading to the
priority of filial obligation, obedience, and loyalty.
Overall, individuals were expected to sacrifice their
own well-being or personal desires for the greater
good of the family structure. Ie as a unit or principle
can be seen throughout Japanese culture well before
the medieval era. However, ie was particularly promi-
nent during the Edo period when strong economic
developments allowed even commoners to establish
their own line of succession for the first time.
The traditional size of the ie was around five peo-
ple. If a person within the family was lost, extra
responsibility was either assumed by the other family
members (within poor classes) or delegated to ser-
vant workers (within wealthier families). The head of
the household (koshu) was traditionally male and held
the greatest responsibilities for running the ie. How-
ever, women could also assume a position at the helm
of the household when a suitable male was unavail-
able. Likewise, the female partner to the koshu was
usually the most powerful and respected woman in
the household; she retained the responsibilities of
overseeing the traditional household duties.
As this suggests, men alone were not the only
individuals who could wield power in early modern
Japanese society. Elaborating on this idea is the fact
that the koshu’s authority was often tempered and
undermined by the traditional moral principles of
obedience to all elders. This ethical standard was
valued highly, as it granted respect to all individuals
of elderly rank, regardless of their sex or position. In
this way, women and servants could also attain
esteem by exercising their duty to the ie.
Housework
During the normal day of a peasant woman, her
duties included daily chores, household work, and
often physically demanding agricultural labor. Such
activity kept lower-class women very busy, often
occupying their entire day. In contrast, wealthy
upper-class women, such as the spouses of warriors,
frequently enlisted the help of maids, servants, and
other helpers to assume the majority of daily house-
hold responsibilities. Even so, these women still
remained occupied in some manner or another—
complete idleness, regardless of gender or socioeco-
nomic position, was looked down upon in early
modern Japanese society. For instance, wealthier
women were still responsible for entertaining guests,
waiting on their husbands, and managing the house-
hold servants. Younger girls were also obligated to
assist in the process of completing household labor as
they were typically assigned the more tedious
responsibilities and less desired everyday chores.
Despite common assumptions to the contrary,
Japanese men also made significant contributions to
the work of the home by assisting in the child-rearing
H ANDBOOK TO L IFE IN M EDIEVAL AND E ARLY M ODERN J APAN
340