
HISTORICAL SURVEY
Introduction
Japan’s medieval and early modern periods encom-
pass nearly 700 years. Life in Japan changed signifi-
cantly between the inception of medieval warrior
rule in 1185, and the imperial restoration in 1868.
Nonetheless, there are continuities that unify this
long span of Japanese history. As the medieval period
began, military clans dominated politics and society,
wealth and status were hereditary, and landowners
controlled the feudal economy. By the end of the
early modern era, warrior families had lost the right
to bear arms. They served as administrators of
impoverished regional domains, though they ranked
in the upper echelons of a centralized government
that instituted peace after attaining power through
military might. While the superior rank of the war-
rior classes remained an important constant from the
12th to the 19th centuries, interdependent changes
in politics, religion, economic climate, culture, and
daily life—to name a few—characterized medieval
and early modern times in Japan.
The transition from an embattled feudal culture
to a unified, peaceable Japan poised to emerge in
industry and world affairs was especially rapid during
the 300 years prior to 1868—the early modern
period. Faced with the inevitability of new technolo-
gies and international commerce, Japan’s feudal sys-
tem, by now comprising hostile provincial domains
that relied upon disenfranchised laborers and legions
of military retainers, became ineffective. A bustling
urban culture emerged, nurtured by the newfound
wealth and sophisticated tastes of merchant city
dwellers. The brief historical survey presented below
charts continuities and changes in cultural, eco-
nomic, political, and social contexts that shaped life
during Japan’s medieval and early modern periods.
A NOTE ON TERMINOLOGY
AND DATING
Before summarizing this history, clarification is
needed regarding terms, dates, and other conven-
tions used by historians of Japan. For example, the
names given to historical eras in Japanese and in
English may differ. The words “medieval” and
“early modern” were first used to describe eras in
European history and may mislead readers who con-
nect these terms with circumstances and dates in
medieval Europe that are not necessarily applicable
to Japanese history. In Japanese scholarship, the era
designated medieval in this volume is commonly
termed chusei (literally “middle period”), and kinsei
(literally “recent period”) is frequently used to
describe the era identified here as “early modern.”
Yet medieval and early modern are convenient
terms, since they are more familiar than chusei and
kinsei. Thus, these terms are used here under advise-
ment, and distinctions between medieval and/or
early modern phenomena in Japan as compared with
Europe will be noted as necessary.
“Feudalism” is another term that merits consid-
eration. In histories concerning the Middle Ages in
Europe, feudalism denotes a system of land owner-
ship whereby tenants would work land owned by
proprietors called vassals in exchange for protection.
Aristocratic landowners assigned land parcels to vas-
sals with the understanding that loyal vassals would
be honored with land transfers from the lord they
served. Similarities do exist between the Japanese
feudal structure and European feudalism, since both
relied upon a warrior class versed in military tech-
nologies for protection and administration, and both
forms of feudalism center on the service and pledge
of honor vassals provided to their lords, the
landowners. While similar in principle, in practice
Japan’s feudal society varied somewhat from the
European feudal condition. Vassals in Japan were
appointed, not as proprietors of owned land parcels,
but rather as stewards acting on behalf of aristocrats,
temple officials, or figures of high rank in the mili-
tary government, who remained the landowners
although residing far from the land itself. With no
tangible reward for administrating land on behalf of
aristocrats, priests, or others of high position,
provincial vassals in Japan could benefit from their
role only if they exercised military muscle in order
to acquire or defend land. In turn, these militaristic
means led to unrest in the provinces, and eventually
to challenges to regional landowners as well as
Japan’s supreme military leader, the shogun. Though
H ANDBOOK TO L IFE IN M EDIEVAL AND E ARLY M ODERN J APAN
2