290 Lean Flames in Practice
in the EGR at a wavelength of around 3 μm – was also recently investigated in a
vessel in [116]). Investigations into means of control of the phasing of combustion
over the range of speed and load for which HCCI/LTC can be achieved is thus one
of the main avenues of research.
Although auto-ignition of the premixed charge can be virtually instantaneous,
such isochoric combustion must be avoided. To avoid damage to the engine as the
charge burns, and to limit the noise, vibration, and harshness from the engine, the
rate of pressure rise must be limited to about 10 bars/
◦
CA. With increasing load, this
condition becomes increasingly hard to achieve and may eventually lead to the unde-
sirable phenomenon of engine knock at an equivalence ratio as low as about 0.3 [117].
Computational estimates suggest that, with a truly spatially homogeneous charge,
this rate of pressure rise would occur at a much lower equivalence ratio, and [118]
shows, on the basis of measurements of chemiluminescence, that ignition fortunately
starts at one or more isolated sites, rather than uniformly throughout the volume of
the combustion chamber, because of more-or-less inevitable inhomogeneities in lo-
cal conditions. This is corroborated by measurements of fuel distributions [119, 120].
It is argued that, in practice, it is the occurrence of either inevitable thermal strati-
fication or incomplete mixing between the fresh charge and hot residuals [121] that
gives rise to ‘sequential’ auto-ignition, starting with the hottest zone and proceeding
thus throughout the charge to the coolest. This reduces the rate of rise in pressure at
any given overall equivalence ratio. It is argued that it is mainly thermal stratification
in the gases far from any thermal boundary layers that controls the maximum rate of
rise in pressure [118], and [117] concludes that means to enhance ‘naturally’ occur-
ring thermal stratification remain a challenge. An interesting question is whether any
deflagration fronts coexist with the ‘volumetric’ combustion associated with auto-
ignition. Some hold that there is evidence for this, at least under some circumstances,
experimentally [122] and computationally [123]: Others hold that turbulence is likely
to extinguish flames at such lean equivalence ratios. Recent debate is summarised in
[59] and is also mentioned in Subsection 3.1.3.
It is known that retarding combustion after TDC is effective in allowing oper-
ation at equivalence ratios in excess of 0.3, while respecting the limit to the rate
of pressure rise mentioned earlier by increasing the duration of burn. Dec and his
co-workers [124–126] argue, on the basis of single-zone and multizone chemical ki-
netic modelling, that this is due neither to the increase in the volume expansion
rate associated with retarding after TDC nor to the lowering of chemical reaction
rates associated with the lower combustion temperatures. Rather, it is due to an
‘amplification’ of the effects of thermal stratification: Expansion of the gases after
TDC increases the induction time. However, increasing retard leads [127] initially
to increased cycle-to-cycle variations, which are undesirable. These authors argue
that, for a given combustion phasing, the variations are smaller for a fuel exhibiting
two-stage, rather than single-stage, ignition (see subsequent discussion) by consid-
ering the higher rate of rise in temperature for a two-stage ignition fuel just before
so-called ‘hot ignition’. Further retarding leads to misfire and partial burning of the
charge: For a two-stage ignition fuel, this leads to complete loss of ignition in subse-
quent cycles, and, for a single-stage fuel, this is followed by an advanced cycle with
complete burning because of the presence of species in the partial burn cycle, which
enhances the auto-ignition of the following cycle. With an increase in the load, that