76
CHAPTER
3.
PROBABILITY. BLACK-SCHOLES
FOR
1v
IULA.
may
be
higher for short
dated
options, since small changes
i
口
the
price of
the
underlying asset lead
to
higher changes
in
the
Delta
of
the
option,
and
therefore
may
require more often hedge
rebalancing.
口
Problem
14:
(i)
The
vega of a plain vanilla
European
call or
put
is positive,
smce
vega(
C)
- vega(P) -
Se-q(T
一明习气
Le
一手
VL/
Tr
(3.13)
Can
you give a financial explanation for this?
(ii)
Compute
the
vega of ATM Call options
with
maturities
of
自
fteen
days,
three
months,
and
one year, respectively, on a non-dividend-paying under-
lying asset with spot price
50
and
volatility 30%. For simplicity, assume zero
interest
rates
,
i.e.
,
γ=0.
(iii)
If
r = q = 0,
the
vega of
ATJVI
call
and
put
options is
吨
a(C)
工吨
a(P)
=
SVT
习气
LJ7
飞/三'Tr
w
巾
he
叫
=
巳
F
Cωom
川附
e
t
山
he
d
仰
e
叩
pe
丑毗丑
ce
of
吨叩&叫圳州
(ρ
阴
C)
on
川
ti
让凶
ime
江
I
T
一
t
,
i.e.,
θ(vega(
C))
θ(T
-
t)
,
and
explain
the
results from
part
(ii) of
the
problem.
Solution:
(i)
The
fact
the
vega of a
plai
口
vanilla
European call or
put
is
positive means
that
,all other things being equal,options on underlying assets
with
higher volatility are more valuable (or more expensive,
dependi
吨
0
日
whether you have a long or short options position). This could
be
understood
as follows:
the
higher
the
volatility of
the
underlying asset,
the
higher
the
risk associated with writing options
0
日
the
asset. Therefore,
the
premium
charged for selling
the
option will
be
higher.
If
you have a long position in either
put
or call options you are essentially
"10
日
g
volatility" .
(ii)
The
i
即
ut
in
the
Black-Scholes formula for
the
Gamma
of
the
call is
S = K =
50
,
σ=
0.3
,
γ
=
q =
0.
For T =
1/24
, T =
1/4
,
and
T = 1,
the
following values of
the
vega of
the
ATJVI
call are obtained:
vega(15days)
vega(3months)
vega(lyear)
4.069779;
9.945546;
19.723967.
3.1.
SOLUTIONS
TO
CHAPTER
3
EXERCISES
77
(iii) For clarity, let 7 = T -
t.
For r = q = 0,
we
obtain
from (3.13)
that
vega(C) =
豆坦豆
f
VL1
汀
「
since,for
an
ATJVI
option
with
r = q = 0,
d1
= In
(主)十
(γ
-q
十号
)7
_aft
i
σJ
于一
2
By direct computation,
we
find
that
e
…
v-
/'1\-
nu-
S
一旦
;z
-
dS
〉宇
-z;
工
2)2
'Tr
7
~
8~
石
U
忐
(1
一宁
)e
牛
For
σ=
0.3
and
for time
to
maturity
less
than
one year, i.e., for
7
三
1
,
we
丑
nd
that
vhu
Qd
nu
>-
h7
414
and
therefore
θ(vega(C))
θ;
三
0.
T
We conclude
that
, for options with moderately large time
to
maturity
,
the
vega
IS
mcreasmg as time
to
maturity
increωes.
Therefore
we
expect
that
vega(1year) > vega(3months) > vega(15days
),
which is
what
we
previously obtained by direct
computation.
口
Problem
15: Assume
that
interest rates are constant and equal
toγ.
Show
tflat7unless tfle price C of a ca11optiOIlwith strike k
amd
mat11rity T
OIl
a
non-dividend paying asset with spot price S satisfies
the
inequality
Se-
qT
-
K
e-
rT
三
C
三
SfqT7
(3.14)
arbitrage
opportunities
arise.
Show
that
the
value P
of
the
corresponding
put
option
must
satisfy
the
following
no-arbitrage
condition:
K
e-
rT
-
Se-
qT
S
P
<
K
e-
rT
.
(3.15)