Gel Dosimetry 413
a reliable and precise technique of measuring diffusion
coefficients in gels was available. [13]
The dosimeter gel is a mixture of ferrous sulphate
solution and agarose gel. In the dosimeter gel, the final
concentrations of the ingredients were: ferrous ammonium
sulphate, 1.0 mM; sodium chloride, 1.0 mM; sulphuric
acid, 50 mM; and for SeaPlaque and SeaGel, 1.25 and
0.25% by weight, respectively.
A diaphragm diffusion cell was used, which consists of
two compartments (A and B) separated by a gel diaphragm
of known thickness, l, and area, A. Each compartment con-
tains a well-stirred solution of known volume, V
A
and V
B
,
respectively. The solution in compartment A initially con-
tains the solute being studied, while solution B is pure
solvent. A pseudo-steady-state diffusional solute flux, N,
through the diaphragm is attained after an initial time delay,
t
0
. Measurement of the solute concentrations, C
A
and C
B
, is
then started and continued for a period of approximately
4
t
0
or longer. Assuming one-dimensional diffusional flux,
perfect mixing, and negligible mass-transfer resistance at
the gel-liquid interface, the diffusional flux is given by
(9.21)
where (1
p
) is identified as the void fraction of the gel
that is accessible to the diffusing solute. Equation (9.21)
is simply the well-known Pick law, integrated over the
diaphragm from x 0 to x l, assuming constant D and
a porous medium. However, C
A
and C
B
are not constant,
and Equation (9.21) is not a suitable “working equation.”
With the aid of a material balance and the assumption of
a pseudo-steady state, a convenient Equation (9.22) is
obtained. Plotting the experimental values of the left-hand
side as a function of time t, the diffusion coefficient is
obtained from the slope of the straight line: [13]
(9.22)
Here, and are the concentrations of chambers A
and B, respectively, at t
0
. Many authors simply ignore the
very existence of (1
p
) or implicitly assume it to be
unity. While dubious in many cases, the latter assumption
is justified for the present case since
p
is very low and
the size of the diffusing ferric ion is several orders of
magnitude smaller than the “pore radius” of the gel.
A standard procedure for an accurate estimate of a 1/
T
1
map is to calculate it from a set of spin-echo images with
different repetition times. The total scanning time for this
procedure may be more than one hour. When diffusion is the
parameter to be studied, an hour may be a rather long acqui-
sition time, as the diffusion may be significant during this
time. Therefore, single images, in which the echo-amplitude
(or MR signal) can be approximated as linear with 1
1
(which also means linear with respect to the absorbed dose)
are used. An absorbed dose of 30 Gy yields T
1
values in the
region of 650 ms and, for non-irradiated gel, 1700 ms (at
1.0 T); T
2
for the gel is approximately 80 ms. In a spin-echo
sequence with a short repetition time (TR 100 ms) and
echo-time (TE 23 ms), the MR signal is approximately
linearly dependent on 1T
1
(or the absorbed dose). The rel-
ative signal can be calculated from [13]
A value of D 1.91 10
2
cm
2
h
1
(5%) was
obtained from three identical but separate experiments. This
can be compared with the result of Schulz et al. [14] They
used a method of unsteady-state diffusion into agarose slabs
and obtained D 1.58 10
2
and 1.83 10
2
cm
2
h
1
for sulphuric acid concentrations of 25 and 12.5 mM,
respectively. The temperature at which their measurements
were carried out was not given. [13]
Gambarini et al. [15] described a technique to obtain
three-dimensional (3D) imaging of an absorbed dose by
optical transmittance measurements of phantoms com-
posed of agarose gel in which a ferrous sulphate and
xylenol orange solution were incorporated. The analysis
of gel samples was performed by acquiring transmittance
images with a system based on a CCD camera provided
with an interference filter matching the optical absorption
peak of interest. The proposed technique for 3D measure-
ments of an absorbed dose is based on the imaging of
phantoms composed of sets of properly piled up gel slices.
Gel containing
10
B in the amount typically accumu-
lated in tumors for BNCT was analyzed by Gambarini
et al. [16] The isodose curves were obtained from NMR
analysis of a phantom of borated gel after irradiation in
the thermal column of a nuclear reactor.
In NMR analysis, a good result is achieved if the
dosimeter response
R is defined as the difference between
the relaxation rate (1T) measured in the irradiated sample
and that measured, at the same time, in an un-irradiated
sample from the same gel preparation:
(9.24)
The highest sensitivity has been obtained with the follow-
ing gel composition.
• Ferrous sulphate solution: 1mM Fe(NH
4
)-6H
2
O,
50 mM H
2
SO
4
in the amount of 50% of the final
weight
• Agarose SeaPlaque: [C
12
H
14
O
5
(OH)
4
] in the
amount of 1% of the final weight
• Highly purified water: H
2
O in the amount of
49% of the final weight
N 1
p
()D
C
A
C
B
l
---------------------
C
A
C
B
C
A
0
C
B
0
------------------------
ln
1
p
()DA
l
-------------------------------
1
V
A
------
1
V
B
------
tt
o
()
C
A
0
C
B
0
Se
TET
2
12e
TR TE 2()T
1
e
TRT
1
[]/
1 e
TRT
1
e
TRT
2
()
(9.23)
Ch-09.fm Page 413 Friday, November 10, 2000 12:04 PM