The conditions for the British reception of blackface minstrelsy, an
entertainment purporting to depict the recreational activities of black
plantation slaves, differed in various respects from those in America,
and for historic reasons. Slavery had been illegal in Britain since 1772,
and after the campaigning efforts of William Wilberforce and others,
the slave trade had been abolished in 1807. Those opposed to abolition
had failed in their arguments that black slaves led happy and contented
lives on American plantations and that their Christian masters were
striving to save the souls of heathens. Another issue that forced the re-
consideration of slaving interests was that Britain, at that time, was
having to define its understanding of freedom in the wake of the revo-
lutionary interpretation of la liberté in France and the circulation of
French political ideas in Britain. This was fueled by the founding of rad-
ical groups like the London Corresponding Society and the appearance
of publications such as Thomas Paine’s Rights of Man (1791–2) and Mary
Wollstonecroft’s Vindication of the Rights of Men (1790), in which she
condemned the slave trade—“a traffic that outrages every suggestion of
reason and religion.”
7
Slavery was eventually abolished throughout the
whole British Empire in 1833. Later in that decade, radicalism was
reawakened by the Chartist movement, which associated freedom with
the right to vote. In 1843, the year the Virginia Minstrels, the first es-
tablished blackface troupe, visited Britain, the leader of the London
Chartists was William Cuffey, the grandson of an African slave.
The reaction to the early minstrel troupes in the 1840s, then, was
not one of uniform praise throughout England, and often entailed some
unease, especially in the industrial Northwest. To win approval, black-
face performers stressed the wholesomeness of their entertainment and
their personal respectability. This had been true of the pioneering solo
blackface performer Thomas Rice, whose visit in 1836, according to the
London Satirist, spread a “Jim Crow” mania though “all classes.”
8
Ten
years later, the Ethiopian Serenaders made their first London appear-
ance at the prestigious Hanover Square Rooms, charging hefty prices of
2 and 3 shillings for tickets. Their status was assured when they were
invited to perform before Queen Victoria. From then on, although it
was true that blackface minstrels did appeal to British working-class
audiences, in Britain they always had a bourgeois audience more firmly
in their sights, and thus left available a cultural space that was to be
filled by the music hall. In contrast, minstrelsy remained the most pop-
ular form of urban working-class entertainment in America until the
rise of vaudeville in the 1880s—though, ironically, vaudeville came
about as a deliberate attempt to attract the “middling class” into theatres.
I do not wish to give the impression that minstrelsy automatically
endorsed slavery. There are, indeed, antislavery minstrel songs, for ex-
ample, by Henry Russell and, later, Henry Clay Work. In New York, the
Hutchinson Family sang their abolitionist song “Get off the Track” to
the tune of “Old Dan Tucker,” one of the Virginia Minstrels’ biggest
Blackface Minstrels, Black Minstrels, and Their European Reception 145