Accession of George IV, 6 Vols., (London: Macmillan, 1837), Vol. 4, p.316;
Tracy, N., (ed), The Naval Chronicle: The Contemporary Record of the Royal Navy at
War, (London: Chatham, 1999, consolidated edition), (hereafter Naval
Chronicle), Vol. 4, pp.62-5.
15 Strangford to Canning, No. 96, 17.11.1807, No. 99, 20.11.1807, FO 63/56,
p.211, pp.234-6; Smith to Pole, No. 2a4, 18.11.1807, ADM 1/19; ‘Table of
Events’, Drake Papers, Vol. 16, British Library Add Ms. 46837, (hereafter
BL Add Mss.), p.147; Francis, Portugal, p.278. Writing to Canning on 14
November Gambier ascertained Strangford had quit Lisbon on the 13th. He
must have remained ashore as Smith had not yet arrived. Gambier to
Canning, No. 15, 14.11.1807, FO 63/62, p.120.
16 Francis, Portugal, pp.188-9.
17 Collingwood to Purvis, 22.9.1807, Hughes, E., (ed), The Private Correspondence
of Admiral Lord Collingwood, Navy Records Society, No. 98, (1956-7), p.223;
Collingwood to Mulgrave, 16.10.1807, Collingwood, G. L. N., (ed), A
Selection from the Public and Private Correspondence of Vice-Admiral Lord
Collingwood, (London: James Ridgway, 1829), pp.314-5; Mackesy, P., The War
in the Mediterranean, 1803-1810, (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press,
1957), p.227.
18 Hawkesbury to Canning, 4.11.1807, HAR GC, 69; Canning to Hawkesbury,
5.11.1807, HAR GC, 32. Although seemingly far-fetched, Hawkesbury’s
concerns perhaps stemmed from Russian operations against the Ottoman
Empire and the Persian Empire in the Caucuses. With Napoleon possessing a
track record of dabbling in Eastern affairs perhaps Hawkesbury had valid
reasons for his views. See also Horward, D. D., ‘Portugal and the Anglo-
Russian Naval Crisis (1808)’, Naval War College Review, No. 34, (1981), p.49;
Mackesy, War in the Mediterranean, pp.225-227; Saul, N. E., Russia and the
Mediterranean, 1797-1807, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970), p.222.
19 Canning to the King, 13.11.1807, HAR GC, 35.
20 Canning to Chatham, 14.11.1807, HAR GC, 31.
21 Canning to Admiralty, No. 34, 13.11.1807, ADM 1/4206; see also Horward,
‘Portugal and the Anglo-Russian Naval Crisis’, p.49; Mackesy, War in the
Mediterranean, pp.225-227; Saul, Russia and the Mediterranean, p.222.
22 Admiralty to Smith, 14.11.1807, Cambridge County Record Office, Cotton
Naval Papers, (hereafter CNP), 588/041/A/1.
23 Canning to Chatham, 14.11.1807, HAR GC, 31.
24 Chatham to Canning, 15.11.1807, HAR GC, 31.
25 Portland to Canning, 13.11.1807, 2 letters, HAR GC, 33.
26 See Horward, ‘Portugal and the Anglo-Russian Naval Crisis’, p.49; James,
Naval History, Vol. 4, p.315; Francis, Portugal, p.279; Mackesy, War in the
Mediterranean, pp.225-227; Saul, Russia and the Mediterranean, p.222.
27 Smith to Pole, No. 2a4, 18.11.1807, and No. 2a9, 1.12.1807, ADM 1/19.
28 Canning to the King, 26.11.1807, HAR GC, 35; Canning to Admiralty, No.
41, 26.11.1807, ADM 1/4206.
29 Horward, ‘Portugal and the Anglo-Russian Naval Crisis’, p.51; see also
Sparrow, E., Secret Service: British Agents in France, 1792-1815, (Woodbridge:
The Boydell Press, 1999), p.346.
BRITAIN, PORTUGAL AND SOUTH AMERICA
296