Preiser W., Smith K.H. Universal Design Handbook
Подождите немного. Документ загружается.
I.10 INDEX
Hall, E. T., 27.7
Halls, Sally, 36.12
Hands-free Telephone, 13.6
Haptic system, 27.1, 27.6–27.7
defined, 27.6
Harkin, Tom, 34.1
Hartshorn, Richard, 36.7
Hatch, J. A., 1.3–1.4
Hawken, Paul, 2.5
Haworth, Inc., 23.12
Headphones (as example of universal design), 32.9
Hearing Aid Compatibility Act (United States), 32.9
Heathrow Airport, 36.5
Height-adjustable exam table, 4.8
Height-adjustable toilet (as example of universal
design), 30.5
Helen Hamlyn Center. See HHC
Helen Hamlyn Research Associate program, 21.1,
36.3, 36.4–36.10
Helios award, 12.6
HEOA (Higher Education Opportunities Act), 39.2.
See also Higher Education Act
Herbin, 12.3
Herman Miller, Inc., 23.9–23.11, 23.12
Herman Miller Corporation. See HMC
Herman Miller Research Corporation. See HMRC
Heumann, Judy, 43.4
HEWI Heinrich Wilke GmbH, 13.4
Hewlett-Packard, 36.5
HHC (Helen Hamlyn Center), 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 21.1,
21.2, 36.3, 36.4, 36.5, 36.11
Higher Education Act, 35.4
Higher Education Opportunities Act. See HEOA
HMC (Herman Miller Corporation), 30.3. See also
Herman Miller, Inc.
HMRC (Herman Miller Research Corporation), 30.3
Hobson, Fred, 28.1
Hogan, Thomas E., 7.3, 7.4, 7.5
Holand, Oivind, 10.8
Home for the Next 50 Years, 26.1–26.10
bathrooms of, 26.4, 26.5, 26.6, 26.7, 26.8, 26.9,
26.10
features of, 26.2, 26.4, 26.6, 26.8–26.10
floor plans of, 26.3
front entry to, 26.2, 26.4, 26.8
guest bedroom/suite, 26.4, 26.8–26.9
kitchen of, 26.2, 26.5, 26.9–26.10
laundry room of, 26.6, 26.10
raised-bed garden, 26.2
stairwell of, 26.6, 26.8
storage in, 26.4
tea/toaster cart, 26.5
Universal design and, 26.1–26.10
Hong Kong, universal design workshop in, 36.10
Hospital resuscitation trolley (as example of univer-
sal design), 36.12
Housing
accessibility in, 41.1
affordable, 24.5
air filtration for, 27.5
in American South, 28.1–28.8
Housing (Cont.):
Cabrini-Green, 25.2
color in, 27.2
crosswalks and, 24.4
demographic trends of, 24.5, 25.1–25.2, 29.3
design for dementia patients, 36.11
diversity in, 28.1–28.8
equality in, 28.1–28.8
future of, 25.6–25.7
health promoting, 24.3–24.5
information technology in, 25.5–25.6
Japan, policy of, 11.6–11.7
life span, 25.4
lighting in, 27.2
median planning and, 24.4
outreach to professionals of, 29.6–29.8
policies, 25.2
professionals, 29.3, 29.6–29.7
sensory, 27.1–27.8
site factors of, 28.5
street crossings and, 24.4
traditional home design problems, 45.3–45.4
transportation alternatives and, 24.5
in United States, 24.3–24.12, 25.1–25.7
universal design in, 24.3–24.12, 25.1–25.7,
27.1–27.8, 28.1–28.8, 38.3
walkable neighborhoods and, 24.4
warning and alarm systems for, 27.4
way-finding in, 24.4, 27.6
The Housing Act (United Kingdom), 44.5
Housing Loan Corporation of Japan, 11.3, 11.8
Housing Quality Assurance Law, 11.6
How Coyote Stole Fire, 35.7
HTML, 35.2, 35.4, 35.5
HUD (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development), 25.2
Huidobro, Borja, 12.6
Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort, 20.6
Human Factors Engineering of Software User
Interfaces. See ANSI/HFES 200
Human-Centered Design Processes for Interactive
Systems. See ISO 13407
Hurricane Katrina, 8.3, 20.5
Hybrid DIGITAL (HD) radio, 34.8
IAUD (International Association of Universal
Design), 1.4, 1.7, 37.3, 38.6
IBC (International Building Code), 6.4
ICE (Inter City Express), 13.3
ICF (International Classification of Functioning,
Disability and Health), 37.3
ICT (information and communications technologies),
33.3
IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act),
18.2, 25.2, 35.3, 35.4, 35.5
IDEA Center, 30.5–30.8, 38.3
IDEA Center bathrooms, 30.5–30.8
IDEO, 36.5
“idesign,” 36.8
IDZ (International Design Center Berlin), 13.1,
13.3, 13.6, 13.7
INDEX I.11
IEP (individualized education plan), 35.3, 35.4, 35.5
IHCD (Institute for Human Centered Design), 1.7,
37.1–37.10, 38.6, 44.8
universal design case study collection of, 37.1–37.10
“II Giardino dei Semplici.” See Bagnacavallo nurs-
ing home (Italy)
IKEA, 42.5
ILC (independent living center), 45.4
Imperial College London, 36.8
INCLUDE Conference, 1.8, 38.6
Include Conference (2007), 8.4–8.5
Inclusive design. See Universal design
Inclusive Design Challenge, 21.1
Inclusive Design Committee (United Kingdom), 17.10
“Inclusive Home Design Act,” 24.10–24.11
Inclusive Housing: A Pattern Book, 25.5, 25.6
“Increasing Home Access: Designing for
Visitability,” 25.3
Independent living, 25.2
independent living center. See ILC
Independent Living Movement, 30.2
India, 3.2–3.6, 44.4
universal design in, 3.2–3.6, 44.4
Indian rhinoceros, 44.5–44.6
Individualized education plan. See IEP
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. See IDEA
Individuals with Disabilities in Emergency
Preparedness. See Executive Order 13347
Industrialized countries, 3.1
Industrializing countries, 3.1
Information and Communications Technologies.
See ICT
Institute for Human-Centered Design. See IHCD
Institute for Product and Process Design (Germany),
13.9
Institute for Social Design. See ISD
Integration, 2.4, 3.3
Intel, 38.2
Inter City Express. See ICE
Interagency Committee on Disability Research, 8.3
Interagency Coordinating Council on Emergency
Preparedness and Individuals with Disabilities, 8.3
International Association of Universal Design. See
IAUD
International Building Code. See IBC
International Classification of Functioning,
Disability and Health. See ICF
International Code Council, 6.4
International Conference on Universal Design, 1.4
International Conference on Universal Design of
Information, Products, and Environments, 1.7
International Decade of Disabled persons (1983-
1992), 11.2
International Journal of Architectural Research, 38.6
International Standards Organization. See ISO
International Year for Disabled Persons (1982),
5.2, 11.2
Internationalization, 33.2
Internet, transportation information and, 19.3
Into the Open: Positioning Practice, 2.3
Irenas, Joseph E., 7.5
ISD (Institute for Social Design), 13.1
ISO (International Standards Organization),
4.3, 15.10
ISO 9241 (Ergonomic Requirements for Office
Work with Video Display Terminals), 4.3
ISO 13407 (Human-Centered Design Processes for
Interactive Systems), 4.3
Israel. See also Jerusalem, Old City of
accessibility codes and standards in, 16.3–16.4
accessibility legislation and regulations,
16.3–16.4
universal design workshop in, 36.10
Italy, 38.6
accessibility legislation and regulations in,
15.1–15.2
aging in, 15.9
transport design, guidelines for, 15.8–15.9
universal design in, 15.1–15.10
Urban/suburban design in, 15.7
Ives, Jonathan, 44.6–44.7
J. Paul Getty Trust, 9.3
Jacksonville Children’s Zoo, 22.6
JAN (Job Accommodation Network), 23.2
Japan, 20.7, 32.3, 33.2, 37.6, 37.9
accessibility codes and standards in, 11.1–11.8,
42.5
accessibility legislation and regulations in,
11.1–11.8
ADA impact on, 11.2
aging and accessibility standards, 11.1–11.8
aging and urbanism, 11.1
aging in, 1.4, 11.1–11.8, 32.10
design requirements, 11.1–11.3
guidepath design in, 42.5, 42.6
guidepaths in, 42.4
need to adapt existing buildings, 11.7–11.8
new housing policy in, 11.6–11.7
universal design, attractiveness of, 44.4
universal design, leadership in, 37.6
universal design in, 1.4, 1.5, 11.3, 44.4, 44.6
universal design of automobiles in, 38.2
universal design workshop in, 36.10
use of incentives by, 11.2–11.3
Japan Housing Finance Agency, 11.8
Japan Rail System, 20.7
Japanese with Disabilities Act, 11.2
Jardin des Plantes, 12.6, 12.8
Jeffersonian grid, 28.2
Jerusalem, Old City of (Israel)
accessibility audit of, 16.6–16.9
accessibility in, 16.1–16.10
Cardo Maximus, 16.1
Decomanus Maximus, 16.1
mobility infrastructures of, 16.2
Muristan Square, 16.2
residential stairway in, 16.3
residents vs. tourists in, 16.7–16.8
structure and topography of, 16.1–16.2
upgrade implementation in, 16.9–16.10
upgraded public transportation in, 16.10
I.12 INDEX
Jessheim, 10.9
JFK International Airport, 20.2
Jitterbug (United States), 32.3, 32.5
Job Accommodation Network. See JAN
Job accommodations, 23.2–23.3
durable, 23.11
effective, 23.11–23.12
timely, 23.11
transparent, 23.11
Jones, S., 1.6
JR (Japan Rail) Tower, 20.7
Juillet, E., 8.3
Jung Lim Architects, 42.3
Just Below the Line: Disability, Housing, Equity in
the South, 25.2
Kailes, June, 20.5
Kanagawa Prefecture, 11.2
Keio University (Japan), 33.2
Kelsey, Hugh, 9.2
Kemp, John, 1.7
Kendrick, D., 20.5
Kessler Residence, 27.6
Kesson International, 42.3
Kinnarps, 36.8
Kitchen, of Home for the Next 50 Years, 26.2, 26.5,
26.9–26.10
Knecht, Barbara, 37.3
Knoll Group, 23.12
Kolte, Olof, 21.7
Kongsvinger, 10.4
Konieczny, Robert, 37.8
Korea, 42.3
universal design, attractiveness of, 44.4
universal design in, 44.4
Korean War, 6.2, 6.3
Kose, S., 11.7–11.8
Kuhn, T. S., 1.3
La Marche Residence (United States), 27.8
Laboratoire de Sociologie de l’Education, 12.8
Lakota Schools (United States), 20.7
Land Ordinance Act (1785), 28.2
Langdon, P., 20.2
Langmuir, Jane, 26.2, 26.5
Lara et al. v. Cinemark USA, Inc., 6.5
Laundry room and closet (as example of universal
design), 45.6
Law 13 (Italy), 15.1
Law 328 (Italy), 15.1
Law 449/1997 (Italy), 15.1
Law on Measures for the Disabled (Japan), 11.2
Lawton, P., 41.2
LC Thesaurus of Graphic Materials I & II, 9.3
LCM, 2.4–2.5
LCSH (U.S. Library of Congress Subject
Headings), 9.3
Leadership in Universal Design Award, 37.2, 37.3
Lear Corporation, 31.2–31.3
LEAR TransG, 31.2–31.3
LEAs (local education agencies), 35.3
Leder, Mark, 45.3, 45.5, 45.6
Lee, Yanki, 36.5
LEED for Homes program, 45.7
Lehner, Richard, 2.4
Leonard Cheshire Homes (United Kingdom), 36.6
Leslie, Russ, 45.6
Levi-Strauss, 36.6
Library of Congress, 9.7, 35.3
Library of Congress Cataloging Department, 9.7
Lifchez, Ray, 1.9, 17.10, 37.3
Life safety
defined, 8.1
evacuation elevators and, 8.4–8.5
paradigm shift in, 8.1, 8.5
Life span housing, 25.4
essential design features, 25.5
optional design features, 25.5
LIFEhouse (United States), 27.2
Lifetime Home Standard. See LTH
Lifetime Homes (United Kingdom), 25.4–25.5, 25.7
Lighting features (as example of universal design),
29.5
Lin, Maya, 27.7
Lining, T. G., 42.9
Livable community, 26.2
Living, 3.3
Local education agencies. See LEAs
Lonberg, John, 7.6
London Design Festival, 36.8
Louisiana Museum (Denmark), 42.2
Low Physical Effort, 4.4, 4.5–4.6, 4.9, 4.11, 9.6,
20.6, 32.4–32.5
Lowe’s Corporate Partnership: Kitchen and
Bathroom Exhibits (United States), 29.7–29.8,
29.11
Lowe’s Home Improvement, 29.4–29.6, 29.7–29.8
“Universal Design Month,” 29.4
Workshop Partnership, 29.4–29.6
Low-floor vehicles, 19.5
LTH (Lifetime Home Standard), 25.4–25.5
criteria of, 25.4–25.5
Lynch, Kevin, 20.4
Lyon, Anna, 45.5, 45.9
Mace, Ronald, 1.3, 1.5, 1.7, 3.2, 24.5, 32.8, 44.4, 44.5
Machida City, 11.2
Macintosh, 21.5, 32.4
Magnifying glasses (as example of universal
design), 32.9
Maisel, J., 29.3
Majority world, 1.5, 3.1, 44.10
demographic trends, 3.2
design interventions, 3.4–3.5
new development, 3.5–3.6
problems and concerns, 3.3–3.4
sociocultural factors, 3.2–3.3
terminology, 3.1
universal design and, 3.1–3.6, 44.3
universal design traditions in, 3.2
INDEX I.13
“Making Sidewalks Accessible is the Decent Thing
to Do,” 20.5
Malaysia, 20.5
A Management Guide of Historic Cities, 16.6
Manley, Patrick, 45.4, 45.5, 45.11
Manual for Streets (United Kingdom), 17.10
Market Place Cinema (United States), 7.6
Marketing
tool, creating, 29.9–29.10
of universal design, 29.3–29.12
Markey, Edward, 34.1
MARTA (Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit
Authority), 20.4
Marunouchi Building (Japan), 20.7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 20.6
Masterpiece Theater, 34.3
MathML, 35.6
Matz, A. Howard, 7.6
“McDonaldization,” principles of, 14.2
MCI Center sports arena (United States), 7.3
McLuhan, M., 44.4
“Meandering Brook,” 4.7
Media
accessibility requirements, 34.5
formats, 34.3
technology, 34.1
universal design in, 34.1–34.9
Medical Subject Headings. See MeSH
Merriman, Niki, 36.10
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings), 9.3, 9.7
Metaform Bathroom, 30.3
bathing node of, 30.4–30.5
lavatory node of, 30.4
nodes of, 30.4–30.5
toilet node of, 30.4
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority.
See MARTA
Mexico, 27.3
MGRAD (Minimum Guidelines and Requirements
for Accessible Design), 6.3
Microsoft, 21.5
Minimum Guidelines and Requirements for
Accessible Design. See MGRAD
Ministère de l’Equipement et du Logement
(France), 12.1
Ministry of Construction (Japan), 11.2, 11.3, 11.5, 11.8
Ministry of Health and Welfare (Japan), 11.2
Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs (Norway), 10.6
Ministry of the Environment (Norway), 10.6, 10.9,
10.10
Ministry of Transportation (Japan), 11.3
Minoan era, 30.1
MIT, 33.2
MoPix, 34.4–34.5, 34.7
Motion pictures, accessibility of, 34.5–34.7
Movable fixtures bathroom, 30.5–30.7, 30.8
Movable panels bathroom, 30.5–30.6, 30.7–30.8
Mullick, A., 1.5
Mumford, Lewis, 20.7
Murcutt, Glen, 27.5
Muristan Square, 16.2
Musées et Collections Publiques de France, 12.9
Myerson, Jeremy, 36.3
NAHB (National Association of Home Builders), 38.3.
See also NAHB Aging in Place Certification
NAHB Aging in Place Certification, 29.6
Nanakuma subway line (Japan), 37.6, 37.9
NARI (National Association of the Remodeling
Industry), 29.6, 29.9, 29.11
NARI award winning kitchen, 29.10
NARI Universal Design Award, 29.6
NARI universal design educational committee, 29.9
Narrative Television Network, 34.3
National Association of Home Builders. See NAHB
National Association of the Remodeling Industry.
See NARI
National Center on Birth Defects and
Developmental Disabilities. See NCBDDD
National Center on Universal Design in Learning, 1.6
National Design Policy (India), 3.5
National Endowment for the Arts. See NEA
National Federation of the Blind (United States),
20.2, 35.4
National Group on Homeworking (United
Kingdom), 36.6
National Health Service (United Kingdom), 36.3, 36.11
The National Health Service Act (United Kingdom),
44.5
National Institute of Design (India), 3.5–3.6
National Institute of Fashion Technology (India), 3.6
National Institute of Population Problems (Japan), 11.3
National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation
Research. See NIDRR
National Instructional Materials Access Center. See
NIMAC
National Instructional Materials Accessibility
Standard. See NIMAS
National Kitchen and Bath Association. See NKBA
National Library Service. See NLS
National Organization on Disability, 8.3
National Public Radio. See NPR
National Science Foundation, 31.8, 39.4, 39.5
Nationwide Arena (Ohio), 20.3
Nature, 34.3
NCBDDD (National Center on Birth Defects and
Developmental Disabilities), 9.2
NEA (National Endowment for the Arts), 1.7, 1.8,
37.2, 37.3
NetFlix, 34.4
Netherlands, 42.8
accessibility codes and standards in, 25.4
guidepath design in, 42.5, 42.6
New American Homes, 27.2
New Mexico State University. See NMSU
next-generation universal home. See NGUH
NGO (nongovernmental organization), 5.2, 21.6
NGUH (next-generation universal home), 24.3, 24.4
bathrooms of, 24.10
controls, alarms, and automation of, 24.10
I.14 INDEX
NGUH (next-generation universal home) (Cont.):
entrances of, 24.8
key features of, 24.7–24.10
kitchens of, 24.9
NIDRR (National Institute on Disability and
Rehabilitation Research), 1.8, 4.4, 19.9, 30.5,
32.2, 38.1
paradigm of, 32.2
Nielson, J., 44.6, 44.7
NIMAC (National Instructional Materials Access
Center), 35.3, 35.5
NIMAS (National Instructional Materials
Accessibility Standard), 35.2, 35.3, 35.5, 35.7
file sets, 35.2, 35.3, 35.4, 35.5
legislation of, 35.5
source files, 35.5
specification, 35.3
Technical Assistance web site, 35.5
NIMAS-derived instructional materials, 35.5
“9/11,” 8.2–8.3, 17.7, 20.5. See also WTC
NKBA (National Kitchen and Bath Association),
29.6
NLM (U.S. National Library of Medicine), 9.3, 9.7
NLS (National Library Service), 35.3, 35.5
NMSU (New Mexico State University), 18.4–18.10
floor plan, example of, 18.8
main campus, map of, 18.5
Nokia, 36.5
Nongovernmental organization. See NGO
Normalization principle, 44.5
defined, 44.5
Norman, D. A., 12.3
North Carolina State University, 4.3, 9.2, 20.1, 32.2,
38.1, 38.2, 38.6
Norway, 42.1, 42.3
accessibility codes and standards in, 10.5–10.8, 42.5
accessibility legislation and regulations in, 10.5–10.8
aging in, 32.10
guidepath design in, 42.5, 42.7
pilot projects, 10.5, 10.6–10.10
planning for accessibility, 10.3–10.6
planning for universal design, 10.3–10.10
universal design in, 1.6, 1.8, 10.3–10.10
universal design workshop in, 36.10
“Norway universally designed by 2025,” 10.9
Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional
Research, 10.5
Norwegian Society for the Blind, 42.6, 42.7
Notes (as example of universal design), 39.4
Nova, 34.3
NPR (National Public Radio), 34.8
Nurses’ station, 4.11
Obama, Barack, 2.1, 44.4
Obesity epidemic, 8.3
OCR (optical character recognition), 35.1
Office of the University Architect (NMSU), 18.10
Ohio State University. See OSU
Ohio State University Extension. See OSUE
Open-loop door handles (as example of universal
design), 32.5, 32.7
Optical character recognition. See OCR
Orange, 36.5
Organization of World Heritage Cities, 16.6
Orioles Park, 32.9
Oslo Opera House (Netherlands), 42.8
OSU (Ohio State University), 29.3–29.10, 41.9
OSUE (Ohio State University Extension), 29.3–29.10
Outdoor play areas. See Play, outdoor; Play area
Ovovia (Italy), 15.8
OXO Good Grips, 13.4, 32.8, 32.10, 38.2
OXO International, 32.8
Pallasmaa, Juhani, 27.1
Panasonic Corporation’s Eco-UD model home, 37.4
“Panel May Recommend Firefighter Elevators,”
20.5
PAR (participatory action research), 9.7
Parade of Homes, 29.6
Paradigm
definition of, 1.3–1.4
elephant, 44.8
life safety, 8.1, 8.5
of NIDRR, 32.2
paralysis, 1.4
of universal design, 1.6–1.9, 27.1–27.8
Parsons, The New School for Design, 2.3
Participatory action research. See PAR
Pattern books, 25.4–25.6
as tools, 25.6
Pauls, J., 8.1, 8.3
PEEP and the Big Wide World, 34.4
Pelli, Cesar, 20.5
People, gap between, 3.5
Perceptible Information, 4.4, 4.5, 4.9, 20.4–20.5, 32.4
“Personal Harbor,” 23.12
Person-environment fit model, 43.1–43.7
concept of, 43.2–43.4
cultural adaptability aspects of, 43.3
diversity in, 43.5
physical adaptability aspects of, 43.3
physiological aspects of, 43.2–43.3
psychosocial aspects of, 43.2–43.3
reciprocity of, 43.5–43.6
Peterson, Mary Jo, 44.5
Petronas Tower (Malaysia), 20.5
PHIL (Public Health Image Library), 9.2
Philips, 36.5
PIF (Project Information Form), 37.6
Pima County, Arizona (United States), 25.4
Planning and Building Act (Norway), 10.8, 10.9
“Planning for all” priority area (Norway), 10.5–10.6
Play, outdoor
challenge, need for, 22.2
designing areas for, 22.1–22.2
free play, 22.1–22.2
importance of, 22.1
for learning, 22.10
physical challenge and, 22.2
safety guidelines for, 22.3
social integration and, 22.2
universal design of, 22.1–22.10
INDEX I.15
Play area
circulation within, 22.4
designing, 22.1–22.2
elements of, 22.2–22.3
entrance to, 22.10
game tables for, 22.8
gardens in, 22.9
gathering places in, 22.8–22.9
landforms for, 22.9–22.10
maintenance areas in, 22.9
pathways, 22.4
performance criteria for, 22.3–22.10
play equipment for, 22.4–22.5
sand-play in, 22.6–22.8
seating at, 22.8
shade at, 22.9
signage for, 22.10
storage for, 22.9
tables for, 22.8
transfer systems in, 22.9
trees for, 22.9–22.10
vegetation for, 22.9–22.10
washup sink for, 22.8
water-play in, 22.5–22.6
Play component, 22.2
Podcasts, 39.3
“Poetic” scenario, 14.3
Point of use, 44.5
Polio epidemic, 6.2
Political boundaries, 2, 28
Polytechnic of Central London, 44.5
“The Potential Ritual for Universal Design,”
44.7
“Prairie style,” 45.7, 45.11
Preiser, Wolfgang F. E., 1.4, 13.4, 38.6,
41.2, 42.8
Print
large, 35.2, 35.5
problems with, 35.1–35.2
traditional, 35.2
Print disability
digital content for, 35.1–35.8
policies and guidelines of, 35.3, 35.4–35.5
Procter & Gamble, 38.2
Production, 3.4
Products
defined, 32.1
with universal design features, 32.2–32.7
universal design of, 32.1–32.10
“Programme of Action for Universal Design
2002-2004” (Norway), 10.6
Project Information Form. See PIF
Prototype thermostat design, 4.8
Public Health Image Library. See PHIL
“Pull the Plug,” 21.6
PVA (Paralyzed Veterans of America), 7.3
PVA v. Ellerbe Beckett, 6.5, 7.3–7.4
Queen Elizabeth (United Kingdom), 21.8
Queen’s Anniversary Prize, 21.8
QuickTime. See Media
RACE (Research in Advanced Communication
Applications in Europe), 44.6, 44.7
RACE-TUDOR 1088, 44.7
Raku Raku (Japan), 32.3
Range of fit model, 43.2, 43.3, 43.7
Range of fit model sequence, 43.4, 43.5
Rapid transit system, 20.6
Raser, J, 20.3
Rawsthorn, Alice, 2.3
RCA (Royal College of Art), 1.5, 1.7, 1.9, 21.1,
21.5, 21.8, 38.6
define phase of, 36.7–36.8
deliver phase of, 36.8
Department of Architecture, 36.6
Department of Communication Art and Design,
36.6
Department of Design Interactions, 36.6
Department of Design Products, 36.6
Department of Industrial Design Engineering, 36.6
Department of Vehicle Design, 36.6, 36.8, 36.10
develop phase of, 36.7–36.8
discover phase of, 36.7–36.8
Jay Mews entrance of, 36.4
research initiatives at, 36.3–36.11
research themes, 36.8
Royal Charter of the College, 36.3
RealMedia. See Media
Rear Window Captioning, 34.5–34.6
Recessed weight scale (as example of universal
design), 32.2, 32.3
Recession, 2.3
Reckitt Benkiser, 36.9–36.10
Recordings for the Blind and Dyslexic. See RFB&D
Reed, E. S., 27.5, 28.5
Rehabilitation Act (United States), 4.3, 18.1, 23.2,
32.9, 33.3, 34.5, 35.4, 35.5
Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center for
Wireless Technologies. See Wireless RERC
Remodeling, professionals, 29.3, 29.6–29.7
Renaissance at Grand (United States), 24.10
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 45.6, 45.10
Research in Advanced Communication Applications
in Europe. See RACE
Research Institute for Consumer Affairs, 13.2
Residence hazard score, 16.5
Resolution A.P. (72)5: On the Planning and
Equipment of Buildings with a View to Making
Them More Accessible to the Physically
Handicapped, 44.5
Retractable door step, 12.4
Retrofitted wheelchair entries
entrance sequences, 41.6, 41.7, 41.8
entrances studied, 41.4–41.6
equality study of, 41.1–41.9
equitable use and, 41.2
as “separate but not equal,” 41.3
study demographics, 41.3
study expectations, 41.2
study methods, 41.2–41.3
study recommendations, 41.8
study results, 41.3, 41.7
I.16 INDEX
RFB&D (Recordings for the Blind and Dyslexic), 35.1
Rhinoceros syndrome, 44.3–44.11
history of, 44.5–44.7
of universal design, 44.5–44.7
RIBA (Royal Institute of British Architects), 17.10
Rifkin, J., 1.4
Rizzo, Patricia, 45.6, 45.10
R.L. Mace Universal Design Institute, 9.6
Roberts, Ed, 43.1, 43.3–43.4, 43.6, 43.7
Rocky Mountaineer Railtour, 38.4
Rogers, Richard, 36.5
Roman era, 30.1
Rose, David, 1.6
Rose Garden sports arena (United States), 7.4, 7.6
Rossetti, Rosemarie, 45.9
story of, 45.3–45.11
Royal College of Art (United Kingdom). See RCA
Royal Institute of British Architects. See RIBA
Rural Studio, 40.1
Russo, D., 15.8, 15.9
S. Siedle & Söhne Telefon- & Telegrafenwerke
OHG, 13.6
Sadik-Khan, Janette, 2.4
Safeway Stores (United Kingdom), 21.2–21.3
Salts, Troutman and Kanshiro, Inc. See STK
San Diego Center for the Blind, 42.3
Sandhu, Jim S., 1.5, 1.8–1.9, 44.5
SAP (Second Audio Program), 34.3
Sari (as example of universal design), 3.2
SARS, 44.10
“Scanning technologies,” 21.4
Scher, Ann, 26.1
Schottenstein Arena (Ohio), 20.3
SEAs (state education agencies), 35.3
Second Audio Program. See SAP
Securing Housing for Seniors (Japan), 11.7
Segways, 38.2, 38.4
Selecting Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools and
Tools Search, 33.5
Self-contained height-adjustable lavatory (as exam-
ple of universal design), 30.4
Sense systems, 27.1
inclusive and interdependent, 27.7–27.8
Severance Hospital (South Korea), 42.3
Sieberthead, 36.9–36.10
Simple and Intuitive Use, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6–4.7, 9.6,
20.3–20.4, 32.3
Simpson-Lee House (Australia), 27.5
Singapore, universal design workshop in, 36.10
SINTEFByggforsk (Norway), 42.1
Situation awareness, 8.4
6-North (United States), 24.10
Size and Space for Approach and Use, 4.4, 4.6,
4.11, 9.6, 20.6–20.7, 32.5
Skywalks, 20.2
Smart and Sustainable Homes (Australia), 1.8
Smart Pods project, 36.10
SMIL (Synchronized Multimedia Integration
Language) 3.0, 33.2
Smith, Eleanor, 25.3
SMPTE (Society for Motion Picture and Television
Engineers), 34.4
SMPTE DC28 Engineering Committee, 34.7
Social Pressures in Informal Groups, 20.6
Social Security Disability Income. See SSDI
Society for Motion Picture and Television
Engineers. See SMPTE
SOM, 20.5
Specifications for Making Buildings and Facilities
Accessible to and Usable by the Physically
Handicapped. See ANSI A117.1
SSDI (Social Security Disability Income), 23.1–23.2
St. Giles Cathedral (Scotland), 20.2
State education agencies. See SEAs
Steelcase, 23.9, 23.12, 36.8
Steinfield, Edward, 1.5, 6.1, 17.7, 42.9
Stepless entrance (as example of universal design),
25.7
STK (Salts, Troutman and Kanshiro, Inc.), 7.6
StoryCorps, 8.2
Street crossings, 20.2
“Street furniture,” 17.6
Streets
audits of, 17.7–17.10
crime on, 17.7
crossings of, 24.4
as disabling, 17.5–17.7
good, 17.8
livable, 17.10–17.12
Structuralism
in accessibility literature, 14.4
defined, 14.4
universal design and, 14.4
Structures for Inclusion, 2.3–2.4
“Studies to Further the Development of Universal
Design,” 4.4
Subway fare machines, 4.9
SUN (Survey of User Needs), 23.13
Supreme Court (United States), Brown vs. Board of
Education (1954), 1.4
Survey of User Needs. See SUN
Sustainability, 2.1, 44.11
as definition of good design, 37.9
in education, 44.11
social, 1.5, 37.3
universal design as, 24.3–24.12, 37.5
Sustainable South Bronx, 2.4
Sweden
accessibility codes and standards in, 25.4
aging in, 32.10
guidepath design in, 42.5, 42.7
Swine flu, 44.10
Sydney Harbor Bridge, 20.4
Sydney Opera House, 20.4
Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language 3.0.
See SMIL
System acceptability diagram, 44.7
Systems thinking, 2.2, 2.3
Szenasy, Susan S., 1.5
INDEX I.17
T-1472 report (Universell utforming som kommunal
strategi), 10.8
TAG (Transport de l’Agglomération de Grenoble),
12.2, 12.6. See also Grenoble Tram System
Takoma Park (Maryland), 26.2
TAM (Technical Assistance Manual), 7.2
Taste-smell system, 27.1, 27.4–27.5
defined, 27.4
living conditions enhancement by, 27.4–27.5
as spatial definer, 27.4
“Tata,” 3.5–3.6
“Tate Stool,” 21.7
Tauke, Beth, 1.7
Taxis, 20.6
Tea/toaster cart (as example of universal design),
26.5
Technical Assistance Manual. See TAM
Technology. See also ICT
assistive, 32.2, 32.8–32.9, 33.4–33.5, 35.4
for bathrooms, 30.2, 30.8
evolving, 33.3
information, 25.5–25.6, 38.3
innovations of, 39.3
media, 34.1
medical, 6.2
new, for automobiles, 31.8
smart, 30.8
time-lag, 21.5
universal design, relationship to, 32.8–32.9
voice recognition (as example of universal
design), 32.8
World Wide Web guidelines, 33.4–33.5
TEITAC (Telecommunications and Electronic and
Information Technology Advisory Committee),
34.5
Telecommunications Act (United States), 32.9, 33.3,
34.2, 34.3, 34.5
Telecommunications and Electronic and
Information Technology Advisory Committee.
See TEITAC
Telecommunications for the Disabled Act (United
States), 32.9
Television
accessibility of, 34.1–34.3, 34.8
closed captioning of, 34.1–34.2
digital, transition to, 34.3
“line-21,” 34.1
video description, 34.2–34.3
Television Decoder Circuitry Act (United States),
32.9, 34.1–34.2, 34.3
“Temporarily able-bodied,” 43.4
Termination-of-movement indicator, 42.5
“The Enabler,” 16.5
“Third Age Suit,” 31.1
Third world, 3.1
Ticket to Work and Self-Sufficiency Act, 23.1
Tilting Trike (as example of universal design), 36.5, 36.6
Timed Text Working Group, 34.4
Time-Saver Standards, 38.2
Time-Saver Standards: Architectural Design Data, 38.1
Tolerance for Error, 4.4, 4.5, 4.9, 20.5, 32.4
Tomohito, Prince, 1.7
“Toward a Humane Architecture,” 20.7
Toyota, 36.5
Trace Research and Development Center, 32.9, 44.4
Tradition-bound countries, 3.1
Traffic calming, 20.3
Tram accessibility, 12.4
Transamerica Tower (United States), 20.4
Transition planning, 18.2
Transport
accessibility in, 41.1
alternative, 24.5
design guidelines for (Italy), 15.8–15.9
guidepaths in terminals, 42.5
information resources for, 19.3–19.4
loading vehicles for, 19.4–19.7
sign systems, 19.3
tactile maps and guides for, 19.3
talking signs and, 19.3–19.4
terminal design, 19.1–19.3
The Transport Act (United Kingdom), 44.5
Travel chain, 17.7
Tromsø, 10.7
Tunheim, John R., 7.5
Tuscon, Arizona (United States), 25.4
Tutu, Desmond (Archbishop), 2.2
TÜV NORD (Germany), 13.6, 13.7
21st Century Communications and Video
Accessibility Act, 34.5
U3A (U.K. University of the Third Age), 21.6
UAAG (User Agent Accessibility Guidelines) 2.0,
33.2, 33.4
UDI (Universal Design for Instruction), 1.6
UDL (Universal Design for Learning), 1.6, 35.7
architecture and, 39.3–39.4
in college classrooms, 39.1–39.5
cooperative learning in, 39.3
defined, 39.2
demographic trends and, 39.1–39.2
demonstrated learning via multiple media in, 39.3
differentiated instruction in, 39.3
electronic voting machines in, 39.3, 39.4
embedded assessment in, 39.3
in GEC classes, 39.3, 39.4–39.5
multimodal learning in, 39.5
multimodal teaching in, 39.3
physics and, 39.4
podcasts and, 39.3
principles of, 39.2–39.3, 39.4–39.5
in recitation and laboratory classes, 39.5
relevant content in, 39.3
self-monitoring in, 39.3
strategies of, 39.3
textbooks and, 35.6
YouTube and, 39.3
UDL Editions Book, 35.2
UFAS (Uniform Federal Accessibility Standard),
6.3, 18.1
I.18 INDEX
U.K. University of the Third Age. See U3A
Ullern Finishing School (Norway), 42.3
ULOS (unobstructable lines of sight), 7.3, 7.4, 7.5
Unemployment, disability and, 23.1–23.2
Uniform Federal Accessibility Standard. See UFAS
Unilever, 36.5
United Kingdom, 17.10, 21.2–21.3, 21.8, 33.3, 36.3,
36.6, 36.11, 41.1. See also RCA
accessibility codes and standards in, 25.4, 44.5
aging in, 32.10
universal design in, 1.4–1.5
universal design workshop in, 36.10
United Nations, 5.1, 5.4–5.5, 44.9
accessibility codes and standards of, 41.2
Special Rapporteur, 5.2
United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons
with Disabilities, 5.1–5.9, 33.1
accessibility and, 5.4–5.5
definition of terms, 5.3–5.4
implementation measures of, 5.5
monitoring mechanism of, 5.5
process towards, 5.2
United Nations Declaration on Human Rights, 5.1
United Nations Millennium Development Goals,
Fundamental Human Rights, 44.9
United Nations Standard Rules for the Equalization
of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities,
5.1–5.6, 5.2, 44.9
United Nations Treaty on the Human Rights of
People with Disabilities, 37.2
United States, 1.4, 4.3, 4.4, 4.8, 9.2, 10.10, 18.1,
18.2, 19.9, 20.1, 20.4, 20.5, 20.7, 23.2,
26.1–26.10, 27.2, 27.8, 29.4–29.6, 29.6–29.7,
29.8, 29.9–29.10, 29.11, 30.5–30.8, 32.2, 32.3,
32.5, 32.9, 33.3, 34.1–34.2, 34.3, 34.5, 35.5,
38.1, 38.2, 38.6, 41.1, 42.2
accessibility codes and standards in,
6.1–6.7, 25.4
accessibility in, 1.5, 6.1–6.7, 7.1–7.7, 25.4, 41.1
accessibility legislation and regulations in,
6.2–6.3, 7.1–7.7
accessible design in, 1.5, 41.1
aging in, 32.10
bathrooms in, 30.1–30.2
building codes of, 6.1–6.7
demographic trends, 8.3, 32.9–32.10
housing in, 24.3–24.12, 25.1–25.7
obesity demographics, 8.3
universal design in, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 44.4
“Universal access” software, 32.4
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 5.2
Universal Design, Clarification of the Concept,
10.10
“Universal Design: Designing Our Future”
(Germany), 13.3–13.4
Universal Design (Periodical), 1.7
Universal design (UD), 3.2, 4.8, 6.1, 6.4, 7.1, 9.2,
23.3, 24.8, 24.9, 24.11, 24.12, 25.7, 26.5, 29.5,
30.4, 30.5, 30.6, 32.2, 32.3, 32.4, 32.5, 32.6,
32.7, 32.8, 32.9, 34.7, 36.5, 36.6, 36.7, 36.10,
36.12, 37.8, 38.3, 39.4, 45.6
Universal design (UD) (Cont.):
as access for all, 17.7
accessibility vs., 6.1
accessible design and, 1.5
aging and, 1.4
as American development, 44.3
assessment framework for, 38.1–38.3
assessment methods and metrics for, 44.9–44.10
assessment research, elements of, 38.6
assessment research, field-based, 38.6
assessment research, history of, 38.1–38.2
assessment research, potential outcomes of, 38.6
assessment research agenda, 38.4–38.6
assessments, codification of, 38.4
assistive technology relationship to, 32.8–32.9
of automobiles, 31.1–31.8, 38.2
barrier-free design and, 1.5, 13.2
bathroom, 29.7–29.9, 30.1–30.8
beginnings of, 39.2
in Brazil, 14.1–14.7
builders and, 29.3–29.12
business and, 1.7–1.8
case study collection of, 37.1–37.10
case study evaluations, 38.1–38.2
certification in, 1.9
in China, 44.4
connection with poverty, 44.4
consumer focus of, 44.9
contrarian view of, 44.3–44.11
critique of, 44.4–44.5
defined, 1.3, 4.3, 5.3, 10.10, 24.3, 26.7, 32.1, 38.6
definition for majority-world, 3.1–3.2
as design for all, 12.1, 37.6, 38.4, 44.3
design for all and, 1.5
design for all vs., 13.2–13.3
design-build model for, 40.1
disciplines relevant to, 38.3
education and, 1.6–1.9, 1.8–1.9, 29.3–29.6,
29.11–29.12, 34.9, 39.1–39.5
in education institutions, 18.1–18.10
effects of, 32.10
elevators for egress and, 8.4–8.5
emergence of, 1.4–1.6
enabler concept and, 1.5
Enabler system and, 23.9–23.11
evolving paradigm of, 1.6–1.8
of experiences, 21.1–21.7
as extension of commoditas, 12.1
Farm Science Review exhibit of, 29.7–29.8
focus on environment of, 43.6
in France, 12.1–12.9
as fundamental aspect of design, 37.5
general lessons learned from, 21.5
in Germany, 13.1–13.9
globalization and, 44.10
as good design, 14.2, 37.3
green design as, 2.4–2.5
guidelines, establishing, 38.6
history of, 44.5
Home for the Next 50 Years and, 26.1–26.10
Hong Kong workshop, 36.10
INDEX I.19
Universal design (UD) (Cont.):
housing and, 24.3–24.12, 25.1–25.7, 27.1–27.8,
28.1–28.8, 38.3
human factors as research role model, 38.4
as human-centered design, 44.3
as ideology, 38.1
inclusive design as, 1.5, 21.1–21.7, 27.8,
36.3–36.11, 37.6, 38.4, 44.3
in India, 3.2–3.6, 44.4
international development of, 14.1, 37.1
international market challenges of, 32.10
international presence of, 3.1
international themes, 1.3–1.6
in Italy, 15.1–15.10
in Japan, 1.4, 1.5, 11.3, 36.10, 38.2, 44.4, 44.6
Japanese leadership in, 37.6
kitchen, 29.7–29.9
in Korea, 42.3, 44.4
legislation for, 7.6–7.7, 10.6
lessons learned for, 23.13
life safety systems based on, 8.5
life-span design and, 1.5
Living Laboratory, 45.3–45.11
majority world and, 3.1–3.6, 44.3, 44.10
marketing of, 29.3–29.12
in mass transportation, 19.1–19.9
McDonaldization and, 14.2
in media, 34.1–34.9
misconceptions about, 29.11
national awareness of, 29.7
in Norway, 1.6, 1.8, 10.3–10.10
in offices and the workplace, 23.1–23.13
origins of, 44.3
outreach project, 29.3–29.10
overview, 1.3–1.8
paradigm shift to, 1.8–1.9, 27.1–27.8
performance assessments of, 38.1–38.6
pervasive nature of, 38.2
philosophy of, 30.8
of play areas, 22.1–22.10
principle 1: Equitable Use, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 9.6,
20.1–20.2, 32.2
principle 2: Flexibility in Use, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 9.6,
20.2–20.3, 32.2–32.3
principle 3: Simple and Intuitive Use, 4.4, 4.5,
4.6–4.7, 9.6, 20.3–20.4, 32.3
principle 4: Perceptible Information, 4.4, 4.5, 4.9,
20.4–20.5, 32.4
principle 5: Tolerance for Error, 4.4, 4.5, 4.9,
20.5, 32.4
principle 6: Low Physical Effort, 4.4, 4.5–4.6,
4.9, 4.11, 9.6, 20.6, 32.4–32.5
principle 7: Size and Space for Approach and
Use, 4.4, 4.6, 4.11, 9.6, 20.6–20.7, 32.5
principles, development of, 44.8
principles of, 1.5, 1.8, 4.3–4.12, 9.6, 13.2, 17.7,
17.10, 20.1–20.8, 32.2, 38.1, 38.2, 39.3,
41.2, 44.3, 44.6
of products, 32.1–32.10
project team, 29.6, 29.9
Universal design (UD) (Cont.):
promise of, 41.9
Public procurement and, 44.10
at RCA, 36.3–36.11
recommendations for the future of, 44.11
remodelers and, 29.3–29.12
residential, 45.4
sensory issues and, 27.1–27.8
shopping scenario, 21.3–21.5
singapore workshop, 36.10
social sustainability and, 1.5, 37.3
as socially inclusive, 41.2
society and, 1.8, 3.2–3.3
standards, development of, 38.6, 44.8
structuralism and, 14.4
as sustainability, 24.3–24.12, 37.3–37.4
sustainability, impact of, 37.3
sustainable design and, 1.5
terminology applied, 9.3–9.4
terminology of, 38.5–38.6
of textbooks, 35.5
as tradition, 3.2
transgenerational design and, 1.5
in United States, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 44.4
in urban design, 1.8, 20.1–20.8
user/expert involvement, 1.8–1.9
vocabulary of, 9.1–9.7
of World Wide Web, 33.2
Universal Design as a Municipal Strategy, 1.8
“Universal design as a municipal strategy.” See T-
1472 report
Universal Design Award (Germany), 13.9
Universal design case study collection, 37.1–37.10
challenges of, 37.6
environments of, 37.5
inclusive public realm projects of, 37.6
jurors of, 37.3
PIF for, 37.6
priorities of, 37.5
team for, 37.3
user personas of, 37.2
Universal Design Competence Network, 13.3–13.4
Universal Design Consumer Favorite Award
(Germany), 13.9
Universal Design Education Online, 1.6, 1.7
Universal Design Education Project, 6.1, 6.2
The Universal Design File: Designing for People of
All Ages and Abilities, 32.2
Universal Design for Instruction. See UDI
Universal Design for Learning. See UDL
Universal Design Handbook, 5.1, 8.1, 13.9, 20.1,
24.3, 38.1, 38.6, 44.9, 44.10
Universal Design in Education: Teaching
Non-traditional Students, 1.6
Universal Design Living Laboratory, 45.3–45.11
architect selection for, 45.4–45.7
architects rendering of, 45.11
design team approach for, 45.4–45.10
features of, 45.8–45.10
floor plan of, 45.7