data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cc91/9cc91d6dc11ad962d30ce9e71a159daca1a91799" alt=""
TURBID DENSITY CURRENTS 14.7
TABLE 14.2 Densimetric Froude Number F
p
at Plunge Point
Author Laboratory or field data F
p
Bu et al., 1980 Liujiaxia reservoir, Tao River 0.78
Fan, 1991 Guanting Reservoir 0.5-0.78
Fan, 1960 Turbid water flume tests, 3-19 g/L 0.78
Cao et al., 1984 Turbid water flume tests:
10-30 g/L 0.55-0.75
100-360 g/L 0.4-0.2
Singh and Shan, 1971 Saline water 0.3-0.8
Farrel and Stephan, 1986 Cold water 0.67
ticles reduces fluid density and the gravitational forces which maintain the flow, causing
velocity to decrease. Lower velocity means less turbulent energy and less sediment-
carrying capacity, which induces additional settling and further reduces the gravitational
driving force and velocity. This process of sediment loss and velocity reduction continues
until motion stops. This same process also causes a longitudinal reduction in the grain
size of the suspended solids carried by the current and deposited along the bottom of the
reservoir; grain size decreases along the direction of turbidity current movement.
Turbidity current flow can be maintained over long distances only when it contains an
adequate concentration of slowly settling fine-grained sediment that can be maintained in
suspension by the current velocity.
A turbidity current having a potential travel distance greater than the length of a
reservoir may be passed through low-level outlets in the dam and released from the
impoundment. This requires that the flood have a duration exceeding the turbidity current
travel time between the plunge point and the dam, since the flow of a turbidity current is
maintained by the continued supply of sediment-laden water. When the inflow ceases,
the turbidity current will dissipate.
The transition from nonstratified to stratified flow and subsequent movement of a
turbidity current along Sanmenxia Reservoir is illustrated in Fig. 14.5. In this case the
current formed as sediment settled in the backwater reach, causing deeper flow to
accelerate in relation to the surface water, which continued moving downstream at a
lower velocity. At range R1 near the dam, the flow field is further distorted by the release
from low-level outlets at elevation 300 m, and the sediment concentration becomes hyper-
concentrated near the bottom. Particle size decreases regularly in the downstream
direction. Near the upstream area of Sanmenxia Reservoir, discharge from the
sediment-laden Wei River has also been observed to produce turbid underflows moving
both upstream and downstream beneath the current of the Yellow River. Conversely,
when the Yellow River has higher sediment concentration, it plunges and flows
upstream beneath the Wei River. Conditions in Sanmenxia Reservoir are discussed in
more detail in that case study (Chap. 24).
14.2.6 Turbidity Current Behavior at a Bend
Flume tests (Fan et al., 1959) revealed that the centrifugal forces at a bend cause the
turbidity current interface to rise at the exterior of the bend and decline at the interior of
the bend. Similar behavior has also been observed in Sanmenxia and Guanting
Reservoirs. The Yellow River has a meandering reach between Range H26 and H22 in