data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6211/d62115d9f8c19a1c90ee68fbb28feb705480314a" alt=""
SEDIMENT ROUTING 13.19
of mean daily discharge and load data published by the USGS. A daily simulation analysis
was run to determine the yield available on 99 percent of the days in the 21-year dataset,
and to compute sediment accumulation in the reservoir from the average daily suspended
sediment concentration, the volume of water diverted each day, and assuming 100 percent
trap efficiency in the off-stream reservoir.
The simulated system consisted of a stream diversion having various capacities,
combined with various storage volumes in the off-stream storage compartment (Fig.
13.11a). Simulation results are summarized in Table 13.1, expressing both storage and
yield values as the dimensionless fraction of the average daily flow (ADF) over the
simulation period. By comparison, the 99 percent run-of-river flow exceedance at this
gage station for the analyzed dataset is 0.057 x ADF. Sediment inflow is expressed as
percent of total sediment load. For reservoirs on this stream with storage volumes up to 90
days of mean flow (25 percent of mean annual runoff), there was essentially no difference
in yield between a conventional reservoir and an off-stream reservoir with an inlet rated at
3 x ADF. Use of a smaller inlet capacity rated at 1 x ADF produced a small decrease in
yield and a larger decrease in sediment inflow as compared to the larger inlet. The smallest
inlet, rated at 0.5 x ADF, had a significant impact on yield for larger storage volumes but
not for smaller. By comparison, a 100-year sediment pool for a conventional reservoir at
this site with a 90 percent trap efficiency will require 5.6 Mm
3
of storage volume,
equivalent to 33 days of ADF.
Depending on the configuration, sediment inflow into this off-stream reservoir is 80 to
98 percent less than a conventional (onstream) reservoir at the same location. For a given
yield, the off-stream reservoir can be much smaller than the conventional reservoir
because the sediment pool is practically eliminated. While sediment accumulation is not
entirely eliminated from the off-stream reservoir, the rate of accumulation is reduced to
such low levels that activities such as dredging become economically attractive. This
illustrates that in some streams a dramatic reduction in sediment loading can be achieved
using off-stream storage, without a significant penalty in terms of yield.
TABLE 13.1
Yield and Sediment Load for Conventional and Off-Stream Reservoir, Río
Fajardo, Puerto Rico
Reservoir Configuration
Reservoir
storage
volume,
days at
ADF
A
yield,
ADF
B
Yield,
ADF
B
Load,
%
C
Yield,
ADF
C
Load,
%
D
Yield,
ADF
D
Load,
%
5 0.145 0.145 2.1 0.145 2.1 0.140 2.1
10 0.220 0.220 3.5 0.220 3.5 0.220 3.5
15 0.285 0.285 5.2 0.285 4.9 0.275 4.6
30 0.425 0.425 10.2 0.385 7.7 0.340 5.9
60 0.545 0.545 16.3 0.500 11.1 0.380 6.7
90 0.610 0.605 20.5 0.530 12.0 0.390 6.8
Notes: ADF = Average daily flow = 1.93 m
3
/s. Storage volume is expressed as days of discharge at ADF,
where 1 day ADF = 166,700 m
3
.
Load = percent of total river suspended sediment load trapped over the simulation period.
A = conventional impounding reservoir, sediment inflow is 100% of river load.
B = off-stream reservoir, inlet capacity = 3.0 x ADF.
C = off-stream reservoir, inlet capacity = 1.0 x ADF.
D = off-stream reservoir, inlet capacity = 0.5 x ADF.