
542
PRESSURE SOLUTION
Bibliography
Appelo, C,A,J,, and Postma, D,, 1993,
Geochemistry,
Groundwater,
and
Pollution. Rotterdam: A,A, Balkema,
Back, W,, 1961, Techniques for mapping hydrochemieal facies, US
Geological
Survey Professional
Paper,
424 (D): 380-382,
Berner, R,A,,
\9%Q.
Early
Diagenesis:
ATheoretical Approach. Princeton
University Press,
Carpenter, A,B,, 1978, Origin and chemical evolution of sedimentary
brines in sedimentary basins. Oklahoma Geological Survey Circular,
79:
60-77,
Chapelle, F,H,, 1993, Ground-Water Mierohiology and Geochemistry.
Wiley,
Domenieo, P,A,, and Schwartz, F,W,, 1990, Physical and Chemical
Hydrogeology. New York: Wiley,
Drever, J,I,, 1997, The Geochemistry of Natural Waters, Surface and
Groundwater Environments, 3rd edn, Prentiee-Hall,
Eugster, H,P,, and Hardie, L,A,, 1978, Saline Lakes, In Lerman, A,
(ed.).
Lakes—Geochemistry,
Geology,
Physics. New York: Springer-
Verlag, pp. 237-293,
Hanor, J,S,, 1988, Origin and Migration of Suhsurface Sedimentary
Brines, SEPM Short Course No. 21, Tulsa: Society of Economic
Paleontologist and Mineralogists.
Hanor, J.S,, 1994. Physical and chemieal eontrols on the composition
of waters in sedimentary basins. Marine and
Petroleum
Geology,
11:
31-45,
Hanor, J,S,, 1997. Controls on the solubilization of dissolved lead and
zinc in basinal brines. In Sangster, D,F, (ed.), Carhonate-Hosted
Lead-Zinc Deposits, Littleton: Society of Economic Geologists,
Special Publication, 4, pp. 483-500.
Hesse, R,, 1990, Early diagenetic porewater/sediment interaction:
modern offshore basins. In Mcllreath, LA., and Morrow, D.W.,
(eds.),
Diagenesis, Geoscience Canada Reprint Series
4,
pp, 277-316.
Land, L,S,, 1997. Mass transfer during burial diagenesis in the Gulf of
Mexico Sedimentary Basin: an overview. In Montanez, L, Gregg,
J,M,, and Shelton, K,S, (eds,), Basinwide Fluid Elow and Assoeiated
Diagenetic Patterns, Tulsa: (SEPM) Society for Sedimentary
Geology, Special Publication, 56, pp, 29-40.
Liehtner, P.C., Steefel, C.L, and Oelkers, E,H, (eds.), 1996, Reactive
Transport
in Porous Media, Reviews in Mineraiogy 34. Mineralogieal
Society of America,
McCaffrey, M,A., Lazar, B,, and Holland, H.D,, 1987, The evapora-
tion path of seawater and the eopreeipitation of Br~ and K+ with
halite, Journai of Sedimentary
Petrology,
57: 928-937,
Roberts, S,T,, and Nunn, J,A,, 1995. Episodic fluid expulsion from geo-
pressured sediments. Marine and
Petroleum
Geology, 12: 195-204.
Schuiz, H,D,, and Zabel, M, (eds,), 2000, Marine Geoehemistry.
Springer-Verlag,
Sprinkle, C.L., 1989, Geoehemistry ofthe Floridian aquifer system in
Florida and in parts of Georgia, South Carolina, and Alabama,
U.S.
Geological
Survey Professional
Paper,
1403-1,
Cross-references
Diagenesis
Diffusion, Chemical
Evaporites
Fabric, Porosity, and Permeability
Hydrocarbons in Sediments
Isotopic Methods in Sedimentology
Oceanic Sediments
Weathering, Soils, and Paleosols
PRESSURE SOLUTION
A grain-scale mechanism of ductile and
water-assisted deformation
The transition from loose sediments to hard rocks arises
through physico-chemical processes at the grain scale. Pressure
solution, in addition to cataclasis, grain sliding, and plastic
deformation, is one of these processes. Pressure solution takes
place when some aqueous fluid coating is present around the
grains. It is a water-assisted diffusional mass transfer normally
occurring in the top few kilometers of sedimentary basins and
in other geological environments such as fault gouges and low-
grade metamorphie rocks. This slow mechanism of deforma-
tion can induce large amounts of ductile strain over geological
times when stress and temperature are not high enough to
promote brittle or plastic deformation.
The classical pressure solution structures have been de-
scribed since the last century, for example by Sorby in 1863,
They include grain and pebble indentations, stylolites, partly
dissolved voids, dissolution seams, and crenulation cleavage.
Since, extensive field evidence has accumulated which confirms
the prevalence of this mechanism in nature.
Following Sorby's pioneering observations, Weyl (1959)
performed the first quantitative interpretation of pressure
solution and proposed that the driving force for the deforma-
tion be related to stress concentration at grain or pebble
contacts. From natural observations such as those of
Figure PI2, he deduced that deformation by pressure solution
involves several successive steps: dissolution at the grain
contacts, transport of the dissolved solutes toward the open
pore,
precipitation in the pore or transport to other pores. This
results in an indentation of the grains into each other and a
decrease of rock porosity resulting in a ductile compaction,
Mechano-chemical processes
A crucial parameter for pressure solution is the presence of
water in the pores, which acts as a medium of reaction and
transport with the minerals. If a porous medium is not
saturated with respect to water, pressure solution will be
localized in the pores where water is present. This effect can
create compacted regions in the sediment whereas the porosity
of other regions will not be modified.
At the grain scale, pressure solution deformation occurs
through three serial steps, the whole process being driven by
stress gradients along the grain surface. First, minerals dissolve
at grain contacts because of a concentration of stress. The
stress variation between the grain contact and the pore surface
can be related to the cliemical potential of the dissolving
mineral (Paterson, 1973), The result is that the coriceritratipn
in aqueous species is greater in the contact film and induces a
gradient of concentration between the contact film and the
pore.
The second step involves solutes in the contact film
diffusing along the grain boundaries. The nature of the
interface between two grains is crucial because it is a medium
of dissolution and diffusion of matter. It is assumed that some
water is trapped inside this interface. And the third and last
step is precipitation on the free face of the grains. Note that
solutes can be transported by diffusion in the pore fluid and
precipitate at some distance from the dissolution area. This
provides an explanation of mass transfer at centimeter scale in
sedimentary environments under local gradients of stress.
If one of these three steps is slower than the two others, it
will control the kinetics of the overall deformation. For
example, diffusion within grain contact films controls the
compaction of salt aggregates at room temperature. In
sedimentary basins, compaction of quartz-rich sediments is
limited by the step of quartz precipitation between 3 km and
5 km and by the diffusion at the grain contact below
5
km,