478 IVa. Heat Transfer: Conduction
The purpose of fin thermal analysis is to determine temperature gradient in the
fin and the rate of heat transfer from the fin. We begin with the analysis of a lon-
gitudinal fin with variable area as shown in Figure IVa.8.2. In the derivation that
follows, we assume that the fin is made of homogeneous material with constant
thermal conductivity. We will also assume that the conduction-convection ar-
rangement guarantees a low Biot number so that heat transfer can be treated pri-
marily as one-dimensional. Additionally, the heat transfer coefficient and tem-
perature of the convection boundary are assumed constant.
8.1. 1-D S-S Heat Conduction in Fins (
0=
′′′
q
)
To be able to analyze fins using the one-dimensional heat conduction equation, we
assume that both sides of the fin (parallel to the
xy-plane) are insulated, or L >> l.
Since the direction of heat transfer is perpendicular to the shaded and the cross-
hatched areas and these areas change as a function of
x, we need to write the con-
servation equation of energy for the elemental control volume shown in the right
side of Figure IVa.8.2. At steady state, the rate of energy leaving the top area by
convection, the front area by conduction, and the bottom area by convection is
equal to the rate of energy entering from the rear (shaded) area by conduction:
)()(
f
x
xx
TThdSdx
dx
Qd
QQ −++=
2
δ
L
dx
h , T
f
x
y
l
y=f(x)
h(Ldx)(T - T
f
)
h(Ldx)(T - T
f
)
Q
x
.
Q
x
+(dQ
x
/ dx)dx
.
.
Figure IVa.8.2. Longitudinal fin with variable cross-sectional area
Two observations must be made at this point. First, we represented the whole
control volume by only one temperature. Second, the surface area for convection
heat transfer of the control volume (dA) is equal to the perimeter times the width
of the control volume (i.e., dS = 2(L + y)dx = Pdx where P = 2(L + y) is the con-
trol volume perimeter). We now introduce an approximation by ignoring y com-
pared with L. The control volume perimeter is, therefore, approximated as
2P ≅ . In other words, we have ignored heat transfer from the sides of the fin to
be consistent with 1-D assumption. After substitution and simplification we find:
0)(P =−+
f
x
TTh
dx
Qd