4. Lumped-Thermal Capacity Method for Transient Heat Conduction 445
provides an exact answer. Despite our preference to seek analytical solutions in
closed form, and the availability of many mathematical techniques for solving
problems in conduction heat transfer, analytical solutions are not always possible.
This is due to the involved complexities such as multi-dimensional conduction in
complex geometries with temperature dependent properties. In such cases, nu-
merical methods are employed. The disadvantage of numerical methods is that
every problem has to be modeled and solved separately. Analytical solutions not
only provide exact answers in most cases, but may also provide applicable solu-
tions to groups of similar problems. Another advantage of analytical solutions is
in verifying the correctness and accuracy of numerical solutions of problems for
which analytical solutions can be found.
Even if analytical solutions exist, for the sake of simplicity, there are occasions
where we settle for solutions with some degree of approximation. For example,
we can find an infinite series solution for temperature distribution as a function of
time in a slab. If Fo > 0.2, we can show that the transient temperature distribution
in the slab can be approximated by only the first term of the infinite series.
In the foregoing discussions, both steady state and transient problems are dis-
cussed. This allows us to learn about the inherent differences. We begin the dis-
cussion with the lumped formulations and proceed to one, two, and three-
dimensional problems in various coordinates.
4. Lumped-Thermal Capacity Method for Transient Heat Conduction
The lumped-thermal capacity method is a convenient means of solving transient
conduction problems. The term lumped implies that temperature distribution in
the object is not a concern since the entire object is represented by only one tem-
perature. This method of analysis is useful when we need to estimate the tempera-
ture response of an object suddenly exposed to a different temperature. By tem-
perature response, we mean the change in temperature of the object as a function
of time. To derive the relation for temperature versus time, consider the object
shown in Figure IVa.4.1. This object is initially at a temperature of T
i
when is
suddenly exposed to a temperature of T
f
. In this derivation, we make two impor-
tant assumptions: a) the medium temperature T
f
remains constant and is not af-
fected by the energy transfer with the object and b) heat transfer between the ob-
ject and the medium is due only to heat convection from the object to the medium.
To find the governing equation, we may derive the equation directly from the con-
servation equation for energy, using the control volume as shown in Fig-
ure IVa.4.1. If the body is hotter than the environment (T
i
> T
f
), then the rate of
internal energy depletion of the object is due to the heat loss to the environment.
T
t
T
i
T
f
Q
n
Q
c
.
.
T
f
, h
ρ
, c, A,V
T
i
T
t
T
i
T
f
T
i
T
f
T
i
T
f
>
T
i
T
f
<
Figure IVa.4.1. Sudden exposure of an object to a lower or higher temperature medium