2 BASIC PRINCIPLES FOR PROCESSING 1057
the areal density of the reinforcements. Most construction is still hand laid and
therefore the choice of reinforcement is the most important factor. The labor
costs of laminating tend to be one of the critical cost factors, and this is strongly
influenced by the number of plies that need to be laid. To maximize the build
rate and to minimize lay-up costs, a heavy reinforcement is preferable, but in-
filtration, consolidation, and drape may be compromised if the reinforcement is
too heavy. In the case of thinner laminates the specified configuration may re-
quire several plies to be laid at different orientations. Thus, if a quasi-isotropic
laminate is specified, there must be a minimum of 8 plies of uniaxial reinforce-
ment (e.g., prepreg) in the configuration [0
⬚,90⬚, Ⳳ45⬚]
s
or four plies of balanced
woven fabric in the sequence [0
⬚/90⬚, Ⳳ45⬚, Ⳳ45⬚,0⬚/90⬚]. This leads to a
minimum thickness of 1 mm if standard uniaxial or woven prepreg is used. A
heavier reinforcement such as a woven glass fabric of 1250 g/m
2
would give a
molded thickness of 1 mm for one layer, but the only configurations would be
0
⬚/90⬚ or Ⳳ45⬚. Alternatively two plies of a four-layer [0⬚,90⬚, Ⳳ45⬚] noncrimp
fabric of 625 g/m
2
would produce a 1-mm quasi-isotropic laminate. If drape
were a problem, then a lighter-weight satin weave fabric, e.g., eight plies of 160
g/m
2
, might be the better choice. For thicker laminates, where drape require-
ments are less severe, heavier reinforcements may be considered.
In the aerospace industry it is common to design complex laminates incor-
porating several thickness changes, cutouts, and other features. These must all
be implemented while maintaining the basic configuration, balance, and sym-
metry of the laminate. This leads to the choice of thin uniaxial or woven prepreg,
even for laminates that are very thick in their thickest regions. Laminates of
over 20-mm thickness containing 160 plies are typically specified. This imposes
a very considerable cost penalty in comparison with a simpler laminate made
up from heavier reinforcements. The enhanced performance must be balanced
against this cost penalty. There is currently considerable effort within the aero-
space industry to develop manufacturing technologies that reduce processing
costs, especially labor, while maintaining acceptable levels of performance.
An alternative approach is to use automated lay-up. This generally implies
use of computer-controlled tow or tape laying equipment. For laying tape the
machinery consists of a moving gantry with a tape laying head with 4–6 axis
positional control. This is controlled by software linked to a computer-aided
design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) package to lay down a series of strips
of tape to comply with the specified lay-up and part geometry. This equipment
is suitable for making flat or shallow curvature panels, which may be sometimes
subsequently further shaped. The equipment is costly but once set up, completely
automatic. Quality and reproducibility are very good, but production rate is not
always much higher than for hand lamination. This is due to the use of quite
narrow tape, 50–600 mm, and a laying speed of only 1–5 m/s. The economics
are generally more advantageous for the manufacture of large panels, e.g.,
⬎2
m length, where manual positioning of large sheets of reinforcement is difficult.
2.6 Economic Implications of Choice of Feedstock
A wide range of feedstock options are available; these range from the raw fiber
tows in spool form, through the range of woven and nonwoven sheet materials,
to the precompounded materials such as prepreg and SMC. There is an added
cost associated with every operation performed on the fiber to convert it into