13.1 Flux of a Vector Field 369
Example 13.1.3. Let us consider the flux through a sphere of radius a centered
at the origin of a vector field A given by A = kQr
m
ˆ
e
r
with k a proportionality
constant and Q the strength of the source. Assuming that the outward normal is
considered positive (see Box 12.1.3) the total flux through the sphere is calculated
as
φ
Q
=
##
S
A · da =
##
S
kQa
m
ˆ
e
r
· (
ˆ
e
r
a
2
sin θdθdϕ)
= kQ
#
2π
0
dϕ
#
π
0
a
m
a
2
sin θdθ =2πkQa
m+2
#
π
0
sin θdθ=4πkQa
m+2
.
It is important to keep in mind that when calculating the flux of a vector field, one remember to
evaluate the
vector field at the
surface when
calculating its
flux!
has to evaluate the field at the surface.Thatiswhya appears in the integral rather
than r. Notice how the flux depends on the radius of the sphere. If m +2> 0, then
the farther away one moves from the origin, the more total flux passes through the
sphere. On the other hand, if m +2< 0, although the size of the sphere increases,
and therefore, more area is available for the field to cross, the field decreases too
rapidly to give enough flux to the large sphere, so the flux decreases. The important
case of m = −2 eliminates the dependence on a: The total flux through spheres of
different sizes is constant. This last statement is a special case of the content of the
celebrated Gauss’s law.
Historical Notes
Space vectors were conceived as three-dimensional generalizations of complex num-
bers. The primary candidates for such a generalization however turned out to be
quaternions—discovered by Hamilton—which had four components. One could nat-
urally divide a quaternion into its “scalar” component and its vector component,
the latter itself consisting of three components. The product of two quaternions,
being itself a quaternion, can also be divided into scalar and vector parts. It turns
out that the scalar part of the product contains the dot product of the vector parts,
and the vector part of the product contains the cross product of the vector parts.
However, the full product contains some extra terms.
Physicists, on the other hand, were seeking a concept that was more closely
associated with Cartesian coordinates than quaternions were. The first step in this
direction was taken by James Clerk Maxwell. Maxwell singled out the scalar and the
vector parts of Hamilton’s quaternion and put the emphasis on these separate parts.
In his celebrated A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism (1873) he does speak of
quaternions but treats the scalar and the vector parts separately.
Hamilton also developed a calculus of quaternions. In fact, the gradient operator
introduced in Definition 12.3.2 and its name “nabla” were both Hamilton’s inven-
tion.
5
Hamilton showed that if ∇ acts on the vector part v of a quaternion, the
result will be a quaternion. Maxwell recognized the scalar part of this quaternion
to be the divergence (to be discussed in the next section) of the vector v,andthe
vector part to be the curl (to be discussed in the Section 14.2) of v.
Maxwell often used quaternions as the basic mathematical entity or he at least
made frequent reference to quaternions, perhaps to help his readers. Nevertheless,
his work made it clear that vectors were the real tool for physical thinking and not
just an abbreviated scheme of writing, as some mathematicians maintained. Thus
5
He used the word “nabla” because ∇ looks like an ancient Hebrew instrument of that
name.