ENERGY
53
Some commentators in the 1960s predicted that the east coast landfalls would attract
energy-intensive, gas-based industries such as fertilisers and petrochemicals. These
predictions were based on the assumption that gas prices would be lowest at the landfalls
and would increase with distance from these points. In fact, spatial variations in the prices
charged by the state-owned British Gas Corporation were very limited and certainly did not
reflect the substantial differences in the real costs of delivering gas within the UK. However,
spatial variations in gas prices to industrial consumers (i.e. the ‘contract’ market) began to
emerge following privatisation. These were market- rather than cost-based in the sense that
higher prices were charged to users who, for technical reasons, were unable to switch to
alternative fuels such as oil or coal. Legal challenges, supported by regulatory changes,
forced British Gas plc to end geographical price discrimination in the contract market and
to publish a national price schedule reflecting such factors as the volume of gas supplied
and length of contract, but excluding the influence of location. Ironically, these changes
have resulted in the introduction of geographical price differentials based on delivery costs
because new suppliers, which include a multiplicity of commercial interests ranging from
oil companies and electricity companies to multinational utility companies, were not obliged
to publish national price lists. This, together with their right of access to the transmission
system under the terms of BG Transco’s ‘common carrier’ obligation, placed these suppliers
at a competitive advantage relative to BG plc. They have exploited this advantage by adopting
price structures which more accurately reflect the costs of supply and, therefore, favour
customers located near the pipeline landfalls. Thus the cross-subsidies implicit in the national
price schedule of BG plc and the objections to geographical price differentials which
prompted these schedules have, encouraged by the intervention of the regulatory authorities,
had the apparently perverse effect of promoting such differentials. The justification has
changed from market power to costs of supply, but the overall effect seems likely to be the
exaggeration of these differentials. The forces which have driven these changes have been
associated with the evolution of the contract market, but the potential for competition between
gas suppliers in the ‘tariff’ (i.e. domestic) market was in place across the UK by mid-1998.
The extent and magnitude of any resulting price variations between households in different
parts of the country is unclear, although it seems likely that social and political considerations
will serve as moderating influences.
The clearest illustration of the possible geographical implications of spatial variations
in gas prices has been the so-called ‘dash for gas’ in electricity generation. Peterhead was
the only gas-fired power station in 1992, but twenty-two were operational by the winter of
1996/7. Further committed and approved projects suggest that Department of Trade and
Industry projections in 1995, that just over one-third of the country’s electricity could be
generated from gas by the end of the century, may be a serious underestimate and others
have suggested that the proportion could reach 70 per cent by 2010. These forecasts probably
represent the upper and lower extremes of the range of possibilities, but there is no dispute
that the extensive use of natural gas represents a very significant departure from previous
practice in the UK. Several factors have contributed to this development. The technology of
combined-cycle gas turbines (CCGT) offers many advantages; it has a higher thermal
efficiency than traditional stations fired by coal and oil; capital costs per unit of output are
low; construction times are short; and incremental additions to capacity are relatively easy.
One of the most significant benefits of CCGT technology derives from the relatively low
emissions of atmospheric pollutants associated with the combustion of natural gas. In