
5.1 Classic Fluorescence Lifetime Experiments 65
5.1.2 Fluorescence Lifetime Spectrometers
Early fluorescence lifetime spectrometers used nanosecond flashlamps for excita-
tion and TCSPC to record the emission [218, 549]. The flashlamps had the benefit
that almost any excitation wavelength could be selected by a monochromator in
the excitation path. However, the pulse duration was of the order of one nanosec-
ond. With an excitation pulse this long, lifetimes shorter than 100 ps could not
reliably be measured, especially if the decay functions were multiexponential. The
most severe drawback was the low repetition rate and the low excitation power,
which resulted in extremely long acquisition times. It was not unusual to need an
acquisition time of several hours for a single lifetime measurement. These long
acquisition times gave TCSPC a reputation as a time-consuming technique. How-
ever, with advanced TCSPC techniques and high-repetition-rate lasers, similar
results can be obtained within seconds.
The modulation technique provides a different approach to fluorescence lifetime
measurement. A continuous light source is modulated and the lifetime determined
by measuring the phase shift between excitation and emission and the degree of
modulation [303, 308]. In early experiments modulated light sources delivered
much higher intensities than nanosecond flashlamps. To obtain a good efficiency
over a wide lifetime range and to resolve the components of multiexponential decay
functions, the modulation frequency must be varied in a wide range. However, since
optical modulators are resonance systems, different frequencies were difficult to
obtain. Now a wide range of frequencies is available, delivered by high-repetition-
rate lasers in the form of the harmonics of the pulse train. Operation at different
frequencies requires careful calibration, though, since the detector, the amplifiers
and the mixer of a modulation system have frequency-dependent phase shifts.
The most relevant difference between TCSPC and the modulation techniques is
that TCSPC works at extremely low emission intensity but cannot exploit ex-
tremely high intensities, while the modulation technique fails at extremely low
intensities but works at extremely high intensities.
The intensities of classic lifetime experiments are well within the TCSPC
range. Furthermore, sensitivity, time resolution, and accuracy are often more im-
portant than short acquisition time. Therefore many classic lifetime systems still
use the classic NIM-based TCSPC technique. The general principles of fluores-
cence lifetime experiments are described in [308, 389], and various fluorescence
lifetime spectrometers are commercially available.
Excitation Light Sources
Excitation light sources for fluorescence lifetime experiments are listed under
Sect. 7.1, page 263. Currently the most commonly used light sources are titanium-
sapphire lasers, frequency-doubled or tripled titanium-sapphire lasers, and picosec-
ond diode lasers. The benefits of the Ti:Sapphire laser are tunability, extremely
short pulse width, and high pulse stability. The wavelength range can be as wide as
700 to 980 nm. With SHG and THG generation, wavelengths in the range of
235 nm to 490 nm are available. The repetition rate is in the range from 78 to
90 MHz, high enough to reduce pile-up problems considerably. However, for fluo-
rescence lifetimes longer than a few ns, the fluorescence does not decay completely