
workpiece was prebent to minimize the flat areas on the ends.
As shown in Fig. 4, the work metal is placed on the bottom rolls while the top roll is in a raised position. The top roll is
then lowered to contact and bend the work metal a predetermined amount, depending on the diameter of the workpiece to
be formed. Machines are usually equipped with a device that indicates the amount of initial bend. Some machines use an
ammeter, which shows the amount of current used in forcing the roll downward. However, this device measures force
only; variables in the work metal can cause differences in the amount of bend for a given force.
As required bending force increases, machines are designed with rolls of larger diameter, and the distance between
centers of the bottom rolls increases. Bending forces are applied midway between the bottom rolls; therefore, less force is
needed for a given deflection, but less curvature is produced.
Because the top roll is adjustable, pyramid rolls can be used for forming irregular shapes by bolting dies to the top roll--a
technique that is not adaptable to pinch-type machines. In addition, plate, beams, angles, and other structural forms can be
straightened with greater ease because the bottom rolls are on the same elevation.
The top roll is an idler; therefore, there are definite limitations on the minimum thickness of work metal that can be rolled
(especially when forming large diameters). Adequate stiffness in the work metal is essential to provide enough friction to
rotate the top roll. The minimum thickness that can be rolled varies, depending on the specific machine and the work
metal composition.
Another disadvantage of the pyramid machine is the large flat areas that remain on both the leading and trailing ends of
the work metal. Because the workpiece must remain supported by the bottom rolls at all times, the ends of the work can
never get closer to the top roll than the distance between the points of tangency of the workpiece and the rolls. Therefore,
it is impossible to eliminate these flat areas by rolling (Fig. 4a).
To minimize flat areas when using pyramid machines, the usual procedure is to preform the ends to the desired radius in a
press brake or to roll an oversize blank, then trim the flat ends after. The shell can sometimes be returned to the rolls for
truing after the seam has been joined. Occasionally, a narrow shim is placed at the ends to increase the bend radius, but
care must be taken to avoid machine overload. The techniques used in forming with pyramid rolls make it more difficult
to achieve the accuracy that is obtainable with pinch-type rolls.
Capacity. Three-roll forming machines are rated by the manufacturer according to the maximum thickness and width of
low-carbon steel plate the machine can form at room temperature. Values are usually given for single-pass rolling, and
allowances are then made for multiple-pass rolling. For example, a machine rated at 19 × 3660 mm (¾ × 144 in.)
(thickness and width of plate, respectively) for work metal with a maximum tensile strength of 414 MPa (60 ksi) and
capable of rolling plate to a diameter of 2.44 m (96 in.) in a single pass can roll to a final diameter of 584 mm (23 in.) in
multiple passes if the top roll is no larger than about 368 mm (14½ in.) in diameter.
If plate thickness is increased to 25 mm (1 in.), the same diameter restrictions would apply, but the allowable plate width
would be reduced from 3.66 to 1.42 m (144 to 56 in.) because of the additional power required for the increased thickness
of work metal. At this point, another limitation may be encountered because the load imposed on the shorter surface area
can become excessive as the plate becomes narrower and thicker. On the other hand, assuming all other factors remain
constant, if plate thickness is reduced to 16 mm ( in.), the allowable width would revert to full capacity of the machine
(3.66 m, or 144 in.), but the rolled diameter could be reduced to 419 mm (16½ in.).
The maximum plate thickness that can be handled by this machine depends on the pinch opening and is rated by the
manufacturer of the machine. For example, some machines rated as described above can accommodate work 38 mm (1½
in.) thick, but for forming this thickness in a machine having the indicated capacity, the allowable plate width would be
reduced to 533 mm (21 in.) because of the above-mentioned factors. All of the above calculations also take into
consideration the limiting factor of roll deflection.
With all other conditions constant, power requirements increase according to the square of metal thickness. Therefore, the
power required for forming plate 50 mm (2 in.) thick is four times as great as that required for forming 25 mm (1 in.)
thick plate of the same width.