Handbook of dielectric, piezoelectric and ferroelectric materials972
required for atomic layer epitaxy of perovskite oxides. The enhancement of
material properties in artificial superlattices was demonstrated by Tabata et
al.,
10
who found the enhancement of the dielectric permittivity in the BTO/
STO superlattice with a stacking periodicity of two unit cells/two unit cells.
We started perovskite superlattice work in 1994 and published the first report
on the formation of BTO/STO superlattices using computer-controlled atomic-
layer-depositions of BaO, SrO and TiO
2
.
11
After these works, perovskite artificial superlattices were prepared by several
research groups using laser MBE process,
12–21
reactive MBE process
22–24
and radiofrequency (RF)-sputtering process.
25–28
Kim et al.
12,13
demonstrated
the enhancement of dielectric properties in artificial BTO/STO superlattices
by manipulating lattice strains in the superlattices. They observed large
dielectric permittivity (ε
r
= 1230) and extremely large dielectric nonlinearity
in BTO/STO superlattice with a stacking periodicity of two unit cells/two
unit cells. Christen et al.
16
prepared SrZrO
3
(SZO)/STO and BTO/STO
superlattices using pulsed laser deposition (laser MBE) and indicated that
the electric field-dependence of the permittivity of both types of structure
had a different behavior from that observed in the corresponding solid solutions,
and, especially, the data of the SZO/STO superlattices were consistent with
the assumption that strain induced ferroelectricity in the STO films at room
temperature. A constrained ferroelectricity was also found in the (001)-textured
PbZrO
3
/BaZrO
3
superlattice films by Wu and Hung
27
and in the BTO/STO
superlattices by Shimuta et al.
29
Superlattices of thin ferroelectric and non-
ferroelectric perovskite layers, e.g. short-period BTO/STO, have been reported
to exhibit enhancements of dielectric constant and remanent polarization.
However, it should be noted that the movement of space charges in the
superlattices can spuriously produce an apparent significant enhancement of
dielectric permittivity as pointed out by O’Neill et al.
30
The dielectric properties
of perovskite superlattices remain ambiguous.
As for the theoretical works on the perovskite superlattices, Neaton and
Rabe
31
performed first-principle calculations on the BTO/STO superlattices
and indicated that significant polarization enhancement could be achieved in
perovskite oxide superlattices. This enhancement arose from the combined
effects of strain, induced in the BTO layers by the epitaxial growth, and
internal electric fields, associated with the superlattice geometry. The STO
layers were found to be tetragonal and polar, possessing nearly the same
polarization as the BTO layers. The first-principles calculation of Kim et
al.
32–34
demonstrated that the BTO/STO superlattices under in-plane
compressive state showed enhanced stability of tetragonal phase while the
stability of monoclinic phase was enhanced under the in-plane tensile state.
Yang et al.
35
also performed first-principles calculations on the SZO/STO
superlattices and indicated that the lattice distortion from the lattice mismatch
in the superlattices led to the formation of spontaneous polarization in the