464 Climate Dynamics
radiation at the top of the atmosphere due
to the presence of clouds) is given by
(10.17)
where F is the local insolation at the top of the
atmosphere, A is the local albedo, OLR is the
local outgoing longwave radiation at a point
on Earth averaged over an extended period
like a season, and A
cs
and OLR
cs
are the clear
sky albedo and clear sky outgoing longwave
radiation (i.e., the average based on just those
instantaneous images that are deemed to be
free of clouds) for the same period.
10.23 Based on (10.17) answer the following
questions:
Why is the net cloud radiative forcing in
Fig. 10.37 strongly negative over the regions
of persistent stratus cloud decks off the coasts
of Peru, Namibia, and Baja California?
Why is the net cloud radiative forcing in
Fig. 10.37 positive over Antarctica?
10.24 (a) Rework Exercise 10.4 from the perspective
of the sensitivity of the climate system to
changes in ice cover.This time, instead of
including variations in atmospheric CO
2
as
part of the forcing, use only the forcing due
to the difference in the Earth’s albedo.
(b) Compare this result with the estimated
climate sensitivity in the absence of the CO
2
feedback.
10.25 Using an approach analogous to the one used
in Exercise 10.4, estimate the sensitivity of the
climate system, comparing global-mean
surface air temperature in the year 2000 with
conditions at the time of the industrial
revolution. Use this value to estimate the rise
in surface air temperature that would result
from a doubling of the atmospheric carbon
dioxide concentration relative to the
preindustrial value (280 ppmv), assuming that
concentrations of other atmospheric
constituents remain fixed at pre-industrial
levels and sufficient time has elapsed for the
large thermal reservoirs in the Earth system to
equilibrate with the forcing.
10.26 (a) Derive a “low end” estimate of the
response of global-mean surface air
temperature to a doubling of atmospheric CO
2
CF F(A
cs
A) (OLR OLR
cs
)
concentrations relative to preindustrial values,
proceeding as in Exercise 10.24, but assuming
a storage of 0.3 (rather than 0.7) W m
2
and an
aerosol forcing of 0.5 (instead of 1.0) W m
2
for aerosols. In addition, assume that of the
0.7 K warming of global-mean surface air
temperature since 1860, 0.2 K is in response to
solar forcing and should therefore not be
included in the numerator as part of the
temperature change. (b) Derive a “high end”
estimate, proceeding as in Exercise 10.24, but
assuming an aerosol forcing of 1.4 W m
2
.
10.27 Based on the assumptions in Exercise 10.24
concerning the various climate forcings and
the estimated climate sensitivity
0.70 K
(W m
2
)
1
, calculate the equilibrium response
of global mean surface air temperature to the
current greenhouse forcing.
10.28 The rise in sea level that would occur in
response to a prescribed input of energy
depends on how the heating is distributed with
respect to the temperature of the water, as
illustrated in this exercise. A planet is covered
by an ocean 2500 m deep with a 50 m deep
mixed layer.The water in the mixed layer is at
a temperature of 15 °C and below the mixed
layer the water temperature is 5 °C. If the
water were mixed to a uniform temperature
while conserving energy, (a) what would the
final temperature be? (b) By how much would
the densities of the upper and lower layers
change? (c) By how much would sea level
change?
The density of sea water is a complicated
function of temperature T, salinity s, and
pressure p.The pressure and temperature
dependence may be expressed in the
polynomial form
Ignore the rather weak pressure dependence
of
0
, c
1
, and c
2
and assume that the salinity
remains constant. With these assumptions,
the numerical values of the coefficients are
c
1
0.2 kg m
3
K
1
and c
2
0.005
kg m
3
K
2
.[Hint: Consider a two-layer fluid,
with temperatures T
1
, T
2
and thicknesses d
1
c
2
(p) (T
0
(p) T)
2
0
(p) c
1
(p) (T
0
(p) T)
P732951-Ch10.qxd 12/09/2005 09:13 PM Page 464