large to be bridged by the 16-Å-long carboxybiotinyl arm
(Fig. 23-3b). However, the BCCP domain is attached to the
enzyme by a flexible polypeptide linker that is 34 Å long,
much like that linking the lipoyl domain(s) to each dihy-
drolipoyl transacetylase (E2) subunit of the pyruvate dehy-
drogenase complex (Section 21-2Ae). Even so, it would re-
quire a dramatic movement of the entire BCCP domain to
transfer substrate between the two active sites of a single
subunit. How, then, does a BCCP domain translocate its
carboxybiotin group between the active sites of a BC do-
main and a CT domain?
Pyruvate carboxylase’s homotetrameric structure is re-
quired for its enzymatic activity; isolated subunits are cat-
alytically inactive. However, the tetramer has only 2-fold
symmetry because the top pair of subunits in Fig. 23-5b
differ in conformation from the top pair in Fig. 23-5c by a
40° rotation and a 40-Å translocation of the BC domain
relative to the CT domain of the same subunit. Indeed,
the BCCP domains in the top pair of subunits in Fig. 23-5c
are disordered, probably because the allosteric domains
on these subunits do not bind ethyl-CoA. Consequently,
the distance between active sites from adjacent subunits is
65 Å for the top pair in Fig. 23-5b, whereas it is 80 Å for
the top pair in Fig. 23-5c. This suggests the model drawn
in Fig. 23-5d in which each BCCP domain at the top of
Fig. 23-5b shuttles CO
2
in the form of carboxybiotin from
the active site of the BC domain on the same subunit to
the CT domain on the adjacent subunit, whereas the
other two subunits are inactive. This is an unusual exam-
ple of allosteric activation coupled with negative cooper-
ativity. It may permit pyruvate carboxylase to carry out
efficient catalysis in association with other metabolic
enzymes.
The foregoing model is supported by experiments
involving two mutant forms of pyruvate carboxylase:
K1119Q, which eliminates the biotinylation of the BC do-
main; and K718Q, which impairs the Phase II reaction.
Tetramers of each of these mutant subunits exhibited 0.1%
and 4% of the wild-type enzymatic activity, respectively.
However, mixed tetramers exhibit 20% activity, thus indi-
cating the formation of neighboring pairs of functional BC
and CT domains.
f. PEP Carboxykinase
PEPCK, a monomeric ⬃630-residue enzyme, catalyzes
the GTP-driven decarboxylation of oxaloacetate to form
PEP and GDP (Fig. 23-6). Note that the CO
2
that carboxy-
lates pyruvate to yield oxaloacetate is eliminated in the for-
mation of PEP. Oxaloacetate may therefore be considered
to be “activated” pyruvate, with CO
2
and biotin facilitating
the activation at the expense of ATP hydrolysis. Acetyl-
CoA is similarly activated for fatty acid biosynthesis
through such a carboxylation decarboxylation process
(forming malonyl-CoA; Section 25-4B). In general, -keto
acids may be considered “high-energy” compounds because
of the high free energy of decarboxylation of the -carboxyl
group. The enolates they generate are used to form
carbon–carbon bonds in fatty acid biosynthesis or phospho-
enolpyruvate here in gluconeogenesis.
g. Gluconeogenesis Requires Metabolite Transport
between Mitochondria and Cytosol
The generation of oxaloacetate from pyruvate or citric
acid cycle intermediates occurs only in the mitochondrion,
whereas the enzymes that convert PEP to glucose are cy-
tosolic. The cellular location of PEPCK varies with the
species. In mouse and rat liver it is located almost exclu-
sively in the cytosol, in pigeon and rabbit liver it is mito-
chondrial, and in guinea pig and humans it is more or less
equally distributed between both compartments. In order
for gluconeogenesis to occur, either oxaloacetate must
leave the mitochondrion for conversion to PEP or the PEP
formed there must enter the cytosol.
PEP is transported across the mitochondrial membrane
by specific membrane transport proteins. There is, how-
ever, no such transport system for oxaloacetate. It must
first be converted either to aspartate (Fig. 23-7, Route 1) or
to malate (Fig. 23-7, Route 2), for which mitochondrial
transport systems exist (Section 22-1B).The difference be-
tween these two routes involves the transport of NADH
reducing equivalents. The malate dehydrogenase route
(Route 2) results in the transport of reducing equivalents
from the mitochondrion to the cytosol, since it utilizes mi-
tochondrial NADH and produces cytosolic NADH.The as-
partate aminotransferase route (Route 1) does not involve
NADH. Cytosolic NADH is required for gluconeogenesis
so, under most conditions, the route through malate is a ne-
cessity. If the gluconeogenic precursor is lactate, however
(Section 23-1C), its oxidation to pyruvate generates cytoso-
lic NADH, so that either transport route may then be used.
Of course, as we have seen, during oxidative metabolism
876 Chapter 23. Other Pathways of Carbohydrate Metabolism
O
CCC
H
2
O
–
O
–
O
CCC
H
2
O
–
O
O
O
OPGuanosine
O
–
O
OP
O
–
O
O
–
P
O
–
C
O
O
O
CC
CH
2
–
O
O
–
PO
2
3
–
Phosphoenolpyruvate
(PEP)
Pyruvate enolateOxaloacetate
GTP
CO
2
GDP
Figure 23-6 The PEPCK mechanism. Decarboxylation of
oxaloacetate (a -keto acid) forms a resonance-stabilized
enolate anion whose oxygen atom attacks the phosphoryl
group of GTP forming PEP and GDP.
JWCL281_c23_871-900.qxd 6/8/10 9:43 AM Page 876