186
5.
Consilient Mechanisms for Diverse Protein-based Machines
to 1.0 gram represents an increase in force;
therefore, Af is positive. On the other hand, the
pH at the pKa increased from 3.99 to 4.84;
therefore, A|x(proton) is a negative quantity.
Thus,
it can be written that (3|Li/3f)n=a=o.5 < 0, that
is,
stretching results in an uptake of protons,
where n = a = 0.5 indicates evaluation at the
degree of ionization of 0.5 which is the pKa, the
point of 50% ionization.
3.
(d[i/df)n=a=o.5
> 0 for the charge-charge
repulsion mechanism: Studying polyelectrolytes
with the example of poly(methacrylic acid),
[-CH-CCHsCOOH-Jn, Katchalsky et al.'^ in
1960 presented the argument that stretching
resulted in the release of protons, that is,
(9|i/3f)n=a=o.5 > 0. The description of the process
for cross-linked poly(methacryUc acid), with a
carboxyl function on every other backbone
atom, follows: (a) At 60% ionization,
charge-charge repulsion gives complete exten-
sion into stiff rods, (b) At 0 to 10% ionization,
charge-charge repulsion is no longer present
and the chain randomizes to give full contrac-
tion, (c) When the chemical potential of proton
in the bathing medium allows 20% ionization,
contraction will have occurred to the extent
allowed by charge-charge repulsion. On
stretching of the matrix at this point, there is an
increase in distance between charges, and for
the unchanged proton chemical potential in the
bathing medium there can be a release of
protons into the medium until the chemical
potential of the fiber again matches that of the
medium, (d) Therefore, stretching results in a
release of protons for the charge-charge repul-
sion mechanism, which is to say that
(3|a/Df)n=a=o.5 > 0 for the charge-charge repulsion
mechanism, whereas for the ATt-mechanism it
is exactly the opposite, (3|i/3f)n=a=o.5 < 0. (e) Con-
clusion: A mechanism other than charge-charge
repulsion is responsible for the stretch-induced
pKa shift exhibited by Tf-based molecular
machines.
4.
Relationship of cooperativity to tspKa'.
Furthermore, the increase in Gibbs free energy
of hydroxyl ion required to remove the proton
from COOH, indicated by the pKa shift of 0.85,
is AG2,i = A|x(hydroxyl ion) = 2.3 RT ApKa =
1.16kcal/mole. In association with the pKa
shift, there is an increase in steepness of the
acid-base titration curve on stretching, indicat-
ing an increase in positive cooperativity. For
small pKa shifts this may be estimated using the
Wyman equation^^ AG = RT(1 - l/n)/a(l - a),
where n (the Hill coefficient)^^ is the slope of
the curve at the pKa and a is the degree of ion-
ization, which at the pKa is 0.5. Under zero
load, n was 1.07; on loading to 1 gram, n became
2.21.
For the zero load case, AGi is 0.15
kcal/mole, whereas for the 1 gram load, AG2 is
1.30, such that the difference, AGi,2, is 1.15
kcal/mole. Thus, both the pKa shift and the
increase in positive cooperativity represent
dif-
ferent expressions of the same energy of inter-
action. Conclusion: Positive cooperativity is
another expression of the competition for hydra-
tion between apolar and polar groups that gave
rise to the stretch-induced pKa shift.
5.
Nonlinear stretch-induced pKa shift: The
stress/strain curve of the cross-linked pro-
tein-based polymer X''-poly[0.82(GVGIP),
0.18(GEGIP)] is shown in the inset of Figure
5.23A to be linear such that the work done on
the elastomeric band is directly proportional to
the apphed force. On the other hand, the pKa
shifts resulting from linear increases in load are
very nonlinear (Figure 5.23B).^^ This carries
significant implication with regard to the effi-
ciency of the conversion of mechanical energy
into the chemical work of pumping protons.
In addition, the acid-base titration curve
becomes steeper, that is, exhibits an increase in
positive cooperativity as the elastomeric band
is further extended (Figure 5.23B). This effect
was explicitly calculated above. Because the
change in chemical potential times the change
in number of moles involved to go from the
relaxed state to the contracted state is the
required chemical energy, the positive co-
operativity means less chemical energy will be
required to perform a given amount of mechan-
ical work. Not only is there a different mecha-
nism from that of the charge-charge repulsion
mechanism, but the new mechanism is more
efficient, as was briefly discussed in Chapter 2
and shown in Figure
2.16.
This will be discussed
more extensively below.