data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72b9d/72b9d958a599887c5ed2ad2369d4a90d50d18652" alt=""
INTRODUCTION TO RADIATION MEASUREMENTS
5
distribution from the true value is a measure of the accuracy of the measure-
ment.
Every experimenter should consider accuracy and precision simultaneously.
It would be a waste of effort to try to improve the precision of a measurement if
it is known that the result is inaccurate. On the other hand, it is almost useless
to try to achieve very high accuracy if the precision of the measurement is low.
Limitations in the accuracy and precision of measurements result from
many causes. Among the most important are
1.
Incorrectly calibrated instruments.
2.
Algebraic or reading errors of the observer.
3.
Uncontrolled changes in environmental conditions, such as temperature,
pressure, and humidity.
4.
Inability to construct arbitrarily small measuring meter-sticks, rods, pointers,
clocks, apertures, lenses, etc.
5.
A
natural limit of sensitivity for any real measuring instrument detecting
individual effects of atoms, electrons, molecules, and protons.
6.
Imperfect method of measurement in most cases.
7.
Unknown exact initial state of the system. Or, even if the initial state is
known, it is impossible to follow the evolution of the system. For example, to
determine the state of a gas in a container, one should know the exact
position and velocity of every molecule at
t
=
0. Even if this is known, how
practical is it to follow
loz0
atoms or molecules moving in a box?
8.
Statistical nature of some processes, e.g., radioactive decay. There is a
probability that an atom of a radioactive isotope will decay in the next 10 s,
and this is as much information as one can report on this matter. The
probability can be calculated, but it is still a probability, never a certainty.
1.4
TYPES OF ERRORS
There are many types of errors, but they are usually grouped into two broad
categories: systematic and random.
Systematic (or determinate) errors are those that affect all the results in the
same way. Examples of systematic errors are
1.
Errors from badly calibrated instruments
2.
Personal errors (algebraic, wrong readings, etc.)
3.
Imperfect technique
Systematic errors introduce uncertainties that do not obey a particular law
and cannot be estimated by repeating the measurement. The experimenter
should make every reasonable effort to minimize or, better yet, eliminate
systematic errors. Once a systematic error is identified, all results are corrected
appropriately. For example, if a measurement of temperature is made and it is