• Senate president pro tempore: Democrat Louise Holland Coe,
New Mexico, 1931
• Senate president: Republican Consuelo Northrop Bailey,
Vermont, 1955
Between 1895 and 1921, the number of women serving in state leg-
islatures was uneven, declining to no women in 1905 and 1907, until 1923,
when small increases became a weak pattern. In the years from 1923 to
1971, growth was steady but again slow. It was not until 1971 that women
made up 4.5 percent of all legislatures. Significant growth in the number
of women in state legislatures appeared in the mid-1970s, suggesting that
the modern feminist movement influenced the number of women run-
ning for and winning seats.
Even with the growth, however, only 22.3 percent of all state legisla-
tors (1,652 female state legislators out of 7,424 total state legislators) were
women in 1999, more than seventy-five years after women gained suffrage
rights. In 1999, the state of Washington had the highest percentage of
women (40.8 percent) in its legislature, followed by Nevada with 36.5 per-
cent and Arizona with 35.6 percent. Alabama had the lowest percentage of
women, with 7.9 percent; Oklahoma had the next lowest percentage, with
10.1 percent; and Kentucky had 11.6 percent. In 1999, Arkansas’s state
Senate was the only legislative body that had no women serving in it. Of
the women serving in state legislatures in 1999, African American women
held 166 seats, Asian American/Pacific Islander women held seventeen
seats, Latinas held forty-eight, and Native American women held eleven.
The significance of women serving in state legislatures rests in the
additional perspectives that women bring to decisionmaking and the dif-
ferences in priorities between women and men, regardless of party affili-
ation. For example, women’s top-priority bills more frequently deal with
health and welfare issues than men’s top-priority bills. Women tend to de-
velop expertise in the areas of health and welfare, whereas men tend to de-
velop expertise in fiscal matters. In addition, the higher the proportion of
women legislators, the more likely that women’s priority bills will deal
with women, children, and families and the more likely that they will win
passage. Women legislators have worked for and won changes in rape leg-
islation and social welfare, child care, family violence, divorce, and educa-
tion policies. Women have also offered and advocated changes in other ar-
eas, including tax policy, the environment, economic development,
transportation, and agriculture. By adding to the pool of ideas and knowl-
edge, women alter the legislative agenda and expand the options for solv-
ing identified problems and for initiating legislative action.
In addition, state legislatures often provide the base from which both
State Legislatures, Women in 639