to the attendees. As the convention date approached, Stanton questioned
whether anyone would attend a meeting on women’s civil, social, and re-
ligious status, but on the day of the convention, the sight of women and
men making their way to the meeting place reassured her. Because it was
considered unseemly for women even to speak in public, Lucretia Mott’s
husband, James Mott, presided over the convention, held on 19 and 20
July 1848. The declaration created only minimal controversy until the
point on woman suffrage was presented. After some debate, it was also ac-
cepted. Sixty-eight women and thirty-two men signed the declaration.
The convention placed Stanton in the vanguard of the women’s
rights movement, even though she essentially remained a housewife in a
small town. She did not attend another women’s rights convention until
1860. She did, however, begin writing for Amelia Bloomer’s The Lily, a re-
form publication; and in 1851, she began wearing the shorter skirt over
pants that Bloomer advocated, although she later abandoned it because of
the controversy it created.
A partnership that lasted more than fifty years began in 1851, when
Susan B. Anthony attended an antislavery meeting in Seneca Falls and met
Stanton. A single woman who never married, Anthony had the freedom to
travel that Stanton, with her growing family and household, did not have.
As their partnership in the women’s rights movement developed, Stanton
provided ideas, rhetoric, and strategies, and Anthony delivered the
speeches, circulated petitions, and organized women’s rights groups.
Of the reforms Stanton advocated, one of the most controversial ap-
peared in the 1850s and was a continuing theme: the need to make divorce
an option to married women. She believed married women needed to be
able to protect themselves by divorcing their husbands because husbands
legally owned their wives, their children, and even their wives’ clothing. In
February 1854, Stanton addressed the New York legislature on the subject.
She concluded by saying:
Now, do you candidly think these wives do not wish to control
the wages they earn—to own the land they buy—the houses
they build? to have at their disposal their own children, with-
out being subject to the constant interference and tyranny of
an idle, worthless, profligate? Do you suppose that any woman
is such a pattern of devotion and submission that she willingly
stitches all day for the small sum of fifty cents, that she may en-
joy the unspeakable privilege, in obedience to your laws, of
paying for her husband’s tobacco and rum? Think you the wife
of the confirmed, beastly drunkard would consent to share
with him her home and bed, if law and public sentiment would
release her from such gross companionship? Verily, no!
Stanton, Elizabeth Cady 635