Thccl;~sticity
of
tl~e wettcd ducts cxposcd to thc prcssurc causcs another error
in
the cxp:lnsion work.
Asj,:lni~ig \v;ltcr hnrnnlcr in
il
pcnstock
as
a
model (Cap. 8.3), the bulk modulus I:,
!ins
to
bc
suh-
jlilutcd
by
thc value 1i,/[1
+
E,di(a
Eh)].
whcre
d
is
a
n1c;ln "di;inictcr" of the d~lct. 11 thc
thickness
of
its
willl,
E
thc Yol~ng mo~lulus of thc
wail
~natcrial and
n
a dcsign-linked par;lmctcr. In larce
,,,achincs, the sccond tcrm in the square
bracket
is always lnrgcr (!Ian
I.
Hcricc tl~c influcncc
of
the
error
duc to cspansion with
EL
in the dcliominator becomes larger than shown by (9.3-2).
The
mensuretncnt of the static pressure (simply pressure) call be made only by tappings,
uniformly
over
the periphery of the flow passage of interest. thus resultinrr
-
in
,
cross sectionnl-avcraged value. Thc method is only applicable, when the streamline
,,,\/ature
in
this cross scction is negligibly sn~all so as to make any incrcase of thc
pressure across the passagc due to centrifugal force irrelevant.
~hc
flo~-a\~ernged square of the velocity at section
1I
and
I
of arbitrary cross section
,4
can be found by measurement of the iocal velocity
c
under the assumption of steady flo\v
with
Q
as the flow
Q
=
5
c
d~.
A
In thc simple case of
an
axial
velocity profile, e.g. of the type
c,(l
-
r/R)"'",
r-
distancc from pipc axis,
R
pipe radius,
c,
vclocily on pipc axis (for
m,
Cap.
5.4),
the time consuming measurement of the
within the passagc is reduced to that of the vclocity on thc pipc axis
c,.
Hence from (9.3-3)
Thus for
trr
=
7,
c2
=
0,7058
ci.
The measurerncnt of
c,
can
be
madc with
a
flow meter. An
cxact
mcasurcmen! of the velocity c.g., by means of
a
PranJtl
tube can bc made only under
a
stcady flo\v
regimc.
Owing to turbulence, the real flow is unsteady. The temporal distribution of the velocity
is
assumed to be
c
=
c1
+
c2
sin
cot,
(9.3
-
5)
with
c,
and
c2
as
constants. Since the
Prar~tlll
probe measures
--
the time-averaged dynamic
pressure
as
a
basis for the ~neasurement of velocity
c2
=
c:
[I
+
(c2!c,)'/2],
an
en-91-
of
(c,/c,)'/~
is
made. This error may be negligible if the level of turbulence
is
small
and
if
the kinetic energy term is small as colnpared with
gh
+
pie.
For high head machines the term
cf
usually is not ncgligible as compared with the hcad
gII
-
p,,;~),
on the other hand in such a machine the levcl of turbulence
at
the inlct (11) given
by
(c,/c,)~
falls
short of
10
".
This docs not hold true for the o~ltlet of the machine (I) especially when
it
operates
under off-design load.
Here the degree
of
turbulence can easily reach
20%,
which includes an error
d2%.
Howcver, this is also negligible, if we co~lsidcr a high head machine, where thc kizetic energy
at
I1
or
I
fiills short of
6%
of the specific head. Moreover the cross sectional arcas
A,,
and
A,
are
usually of the same ordcr so as to cancel the difference
ci,
-
ci
in
(9.3-
1).
However, for part load operation of the machine, account must bz taken of the fac!. that
by
stall the main flow occupics only
a
portion of the available cross section of the draft
lube outlct. Once the sections
A,,
and
A,
are equal and the
stall
blocks
50%
of the section
A,,
in a machine, where the kinetic energy at
A,
under regular flow is only
1
YO
of the head,
no\\.
the kinetic energy becomes
4%
of the head.
And
this would yield
a
surplus
of
3%
of kinetic cnergy at the exit, which is not used.
.
The latter is a considerable amount, since at continental price level the revenues due to
1%
loss at rated load may be of the order
of
the cost of one set
lo).
-
10
Tllis
statement
for
I
%
loss
;~t
ratcd load
is
equivalent
lo
3%
loss
at
3026
of
rated
load.