,he comparison of the velccity trianglcs
31
2 and 2*, having the same n~eridional com-
P
onc~lt.
?'his gives the slip (Fig. 6.6.1 c)
c,*,
-
cU2
=
c,,
(I/@,
-
1)
CO~
Pf
,
(6.6
-
8)
and by mcans of (6.6- 1
j
the desired slip factor
pl
=
2
cp2
Ku2
q,cot
PZ
(1/Q2
-
I),
(6.6
-
9)
,&ere
9,
=
c,,/u, is the flow coefficient (Cap.
9.2).
6.6.4.
Slip
p4
as
a
consequence
of
cascade
flow
The special influence the cascade of
a
mixed flow rotor has on the slip is that due to the
eddy, as treated above. Under the assumption that the individual slip
ef?-ects can
be
superimposed, the remaining effects due to a cascade will be studied at a stationary
cascade with plane potential flow on axisymmetric stream faces. After Cap. 6.2.1 this can
be
transformed into a straight cascade at angles retained by conformal mapping.
Therefore imagine the cascade of the impeller considered to be thus transformed into a
cascade. Retaining
the angles
/IT,
/I2
under this procedure means also retailling
the so-called "deviation angle"
,!IT
-
/I2
(Fig. 6.6.1 a) due to the s!ip
c,*,
-
c,, ar?d linked
to it by the obvious relation
Hence the slip factor from
(6.6-
I)
is linked to the deviation anglc (remember alvays
in
the case of pumps) by means of
As
will be seen in the following, the deviation angle
/J;
-
/3,
can be easily obtai!~ed for
a
cascade of given geometry and within a certain undisturbed flow
lv,
(a~d the conse-
quent physical angle of attack
6,)
by mcans of cascade theory according to
Cap.
6.2.
The conformal mapping of a usual radial or mixed flow impeller with its small vane
angles
results in a straight cascade, having
a
pitch to chord ratio
t/L
smaller than "one"
(tjL
<
1).
-
Consideration of the deviation angle
/If
-
/I,
at the outlet of a straight cascade lvith
tlL<
1,
vane angle
/IT
at exit
2
known: For this purpose some findings of the cascade flow
in Cap.
6.2
and Cap. 6.3 must be reviewed.
First the lift coefficient
c,,
of an aerofoil within a cascade is linked to its pitch
to
chord
ratio
t/L,
the so-called "deflection" Ac,
=
c,,
-
c,,, and the undisturbed throughflow
velocity
wco
by the relation
(6.3--4)
Obviously
as
in Fig.
5.5.5
d,
the so-called "deflection triangle", extracted from both the
velocity
trianglcs, and consisting of Ac,,
w,,
w,
and hence also
w,
=
(w,
+
N*,);Z,
yields
Acy
=
c,(cot
P1
-
cot
P2).
(6.6
-
13)
On the othcr hand the same
lift
coeflicient
follows, according to cascade theory frorn
(6.2-50).
Substituting there for
thc
physical angle of attack
6,
the difference of the i~nele
PO,
between zero Lift direction and the
circumference,
and the angle
8,,
the undisturbed