NOTES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF UNIVERSAL DESIGN IN BRAZIL 14.5
Brazilian federal laws and ordinances (Brasil, 2004) consist of a comprehensive approach to accessibil-
ity issues. Based on that fact, the roles of experts, building officials, city administrators, public attorneys,
and professionals have changed, and people have become more responsive to concerns about the range of
needs of the population. In fact, one positive outcome is the attempt to present universal design as a holistic
perspective, synthesizing a wide range of initiatives: transportation, e.g., buses, train systems, ships, and
airlines; communication, e.g., the Internet, television, telephone, etc.; and other public services.
Although Brazil continues significant initiatives to create accessible environments and social
inclusion, those efforts remain ineffective. Brazil invests a large amount of social resources to
improve the built environment through law enforcement as a means to address the needs of a growing
population of people with disabilities, people older than 65 years, pregnant women, and other people
with temporary impairments (Brasil/Ministerio das. Cidades, 2004b).
However, legislation and technical standards primarily focus on design ideas for specific problems.
Anecdotal observation and academic research (Fernandino and Duarte, 2004) reveal that many of
these resources do not result in the creation of universally designed environments. Compliance with
legislation has been inconsistent thus far, and there is no single architectural design project that strictly
follows all requirements contained in the national standards of the Associação Brasileira de Normas
Técnicas (ABNT). Product design, automotive manufacturing, and urban interventions also appear to
lack conceptual consistency with both universal design concepts and accessibility requirements.
At Brazilian universities, formal design education still focuses on understanding the basic criteria for
accessibility of “people with reduced mobility.” In practice, however, there is concern for the develop-
ment of accessible buildings only with regard to special groups of people. This is a problematic fallacy,
because, in the context of Brazilian laws, the concept of universal design has been partially misunder-
stood (Guimarães, 2010). Thus, major elements of accessibility, such as larger restrooms, wider doors,
platform lifts, or ramps, have been slowly incorporated as special features in new buildings. Despite
the growing number of buildings, urban settings, and products that attempt to follow the guidelines and
standards, the overall scope of design ideas seems shallow (Cambiaghi, 2007). This reveals that, despite
all the efforts, the practice of universal design is not a significant part of Brazilian design culture.
A common design solution for public buildings, e.g., is to place a code-compliant vertical platform
lift outside, typically beside a flight of stairs with handrails and landings protruding into the main
entry area. Such clutter of elements distorts the message of “everybody is welcome” (see Fig. 14.2)
and implies that accessibility creates unattractive results. Proper consideration of site planning at the
early stages of project development can eliminate unnecessary level changes and will provide equal
access to building for everyone (see Fig. 14.3).
As a consequence of “grammar structuring” through code compliance, the above example shows
a combination of accessible features of building elements, which can diminish the quality of the
architectural experience. Conversely, one can “write poetry” by adopting a truly inclusive approach
in preliminary stages of design, and by focusing on quality experiences for all users.
Adopting technical standards for accessibility (ABNT, 2004) in order to create better envi-
ronments constitutes one of the general guides for development of more user-responsive design
solutions. Its well-known format with sketched illustrations helps novices working on solutions to
architectural barriers. The technical standards booklet appears to provide all the needed information
related to dimensions and the required minimum number of accessible fixtures or installations. Thus,
the prevailing message to students and professionals is to treat unfamiliar situations by utilizing tech-
nical rules-of-thumb as shortcuts. Unfortunately, as a consequence, they are avoiding direct contact
with building users and their diverse needs.
Since the development of universal design depends on increasing diversity in the built envi-
ronment, it is important that the design literature present clear explanations, such as connections
among problems; prescribed solutions; users’/clients’ various perspectives; and, finally, postoccu-
pancy evaluations of successes and failures. For example, illustrated how-to booklets in a variety
of formats are dominant in the Brazilian literature, rather than technical books or magazines that
describe novel and successful universal design solutions. This again reinforces the “grammatical,”
and not the “poetic,” practice of the concept of universal design.
Both legislation (Brasil, 2001a, 2001b, 2004) and technical standards (ABNT, 2004) in Brazil
contain information that is based on foreign scientific research. However, as the knowledge base for