
34 Part I A framework for financial decisions
Inion plans £30m public offering
Inion, a Finnish medical devices company,
is planning to raise £30m in an initial pub-
lic offering on the London Stock Exchange.
The indicative price range for the flota-
tion has been set at between 113p and
136p a share, giving a market capitalisa-
tion of between £80m and £90m.
The company, which makes biodegrad-
able polymer implants, was set up in 1999
by senior researchers from Bionics, a
Nasdaq-listed Finnish implants company.
Auvo Kaikkonen, chief executive, said
listing alongside other medical technology
companies in London would ensure better
liquidity than floating on the Helsinki Stock
Exchange, which is dominated by Nokia.
‘We wanted a market where there was an
experienced analyst and investor commu-
nity,’ he said.
Inion’s products include biodegradable
screws, plates and meshes to stabilise bro-
ken and damaged bones while they heal.
Inion incurred a pre-tax loss of approxi-
mately ;3m (£2.1m) on revenues of ;2.4m
in the first half of 2004. Mr Kaikkonen
said it would break even when revenues
reached ;20m.
Source: Financial Times, 10 November 2004.
2.5 ARE FINANCIAL MARKETS EFFICIENT?
If financial managers are to achieve corporate goals, they require well-developed finan-
cial markets where transfers of wealth from savers to borrowers are efficient in both
pricing and operational cost.
Efficiency can mean many things. The economist talks about allocative efficiency –
the extent to which resources are allocated to the most productive uses, thus satisfying
society’s needs to the maximum. The engineer talks about operating or technical effi-
ciency – the extent to which a mechanism performs to maximum capability. The soci-
ologist and the political scientist talk about social efficiency – the extent to which a
mechanism conforms to accepted social and political values. The most important con-
cept of efficiency for our purposes is pricing or information efficiency. This refers to the
extent to which available information is built into the structure of share prices. If infor-
mation relevant for assessing a company’s future earnings prospects (including both
past information and relevant information relating to future expected events) is wide-
ly and cheaply available, then this will be impounded into share prices by an efficient
market. As a result, the market should allow all participants to compete on an equal
basis in a so-called fair game.
We often hear of the shares of a particular company being ‘under-valued’ or ‘over-val-
ued’, the implication being that the stock market pricing mechanism has got it wrong and
that analysts know better. In an efficient stock market, current market prices fully reflect avail-
able information and it is impossible to outperform the market consistently, except by luck.
Consider any major European stock market. On any given trading day, there are
hundreds of analysts – representing the powerful financial institutions which domi-
nate the market – closely tracking the daily performance of the share price of, say,
Wimpey, the construction company. They each receive at the same time new informa-
tion from the company – a major order, a labour dispute or a revised profits forecast.
This information is rapidly evaluated and reflected in the share price by their decisions
to buy or sell Wimpey shares. The measure of efficiency is seen in the extent and speed with
which the market reflects new information in the share price.
The Law of One Price suggests that equivalent securities must be traded at the
same price (excluding differences in transaction costs). If this is not the case, arbi-
trage opportunities arise whereby a trader can buy a security at a lower price and
simultaneously sell it at a higher price, thereby making a profit without incurring
allocative efficiency
The most efficient way that a
society can allocate its overall
stock of resources
operating/technical
efficiency
The most cost-effective way of
producing an item, or organis-
ing a process
social efficiency
The extent to which a socio-
economic system accords with
prevailing social and ethical
standards
pricing/information
efficiency
The extent to which available
information is impounded into
the current set of share prices
fair game
A competitive process in which
all participants have equal
access to information and
therefore similar chances of
success
arbitrage
The process whereby astute
entrepreneurs identify and
exploit opportunities to make
profits by trading on differen-
tials in price of the same item
as between two locations or
markets
FT
CFAI_C02.QXD 10/28/05 2:19 PM Page 34