194 5 Discrete-Time Process Models
-
ω
S
ω
S
2
ω
S
-
ω
C
ω
C
0
|Y*(j
ω
)|
ω
ω
S
/2
Fig. 5.7. Spectral density of a sampled signal y
∗
(t)
Two cases can occur. In the first one the frequency ω
c
is smaller than or
equal to half of the sampling period, hence
ω
c
≤
ω
s
2
(5.15)
In this case the spectral density of |Y
∗
(jω)| is composed of spectra of
|Y (jω)| shifted to the right of nω
s
and that are non-overlapping.
The second case occurs if the frequency ω
c
is larger than half of the sam-
pling period
ω
c
>
ω
s
2
Here the spectral density of |Y
∗
(jω)| consists of spectra |Y (jω)| shifted to the
right of nω
s
and overlapping. Hence, the spectral density of the signal |Y
∗
(jω)|
is distorted.
The previous analysis has shown that it is imperative for non-overlapping
spectral densities that the sampling period obeys the relation
ω
s
≥ 2ω
c
(5.16)
Overlapping of the spectra can be removed when a suitable anti-aliasing filter
is used for the original continuous-time signal before sampling.
The sampling period choice is rather a problem of experience than some
exact procedure. In general is has a strong influence on dynamic properties of
controlled system, as well as on whole closed-loop system.
Consider a dynamical system of the first order of the form
T
dy(t)
dt
+ y(t)=u(t) (5.17)
where y(t) is the output variable, u(t) is the input variable, and T is the process
time constant. The sampling period can be chosen based on the relation
T
5
<T
s
<
T
2