
IMBRICATION AND FLOW-ORIENTED CLASTS
371
time factor and chemistry and use various kinetic equations to
model the experimental illitization profiles.
K-Ar dating of illite
The interpretation of K-Ar dates depends on the type of host
rock. In pure beach or eolian sandstones all illite can be
authigenic (hairy illites) and the radiometric date indicates the
time of hot fluid flow and perhaps oil emplacement (Hamilton
etal., 1992). Shales, even in the finest fractions, usually contain
a mixture of authigenic and detrital illite. Techniques for
obtaining both ages have been proposed. If extracted properly,
the K-Ar date of diagenetic illite from shale represents the
mean time that has passed between the onset of illitization and
the time of maximum paleoternperature. This mean strongly
depends on burial history (Srodori et al., 2002). Many
bentonites are free of detrital contamination, but the K-Ar
date represents an even longer period of time than I-S from
surrounding shales because of slow diffusion of potassium into
the bentonite. This period of time can be evaluated by dating
bentonites that are zoned, that is, less highly illitized in the
center of the bed, and/or fractions of fundamental particles
separated from a bentonite.
Jan Srodori
Bibliography
Bauer, A., Velde, B., and Gaupp, R., 2000. Experimental constraints
on illite crystal morphology. Clay Minerals, 35: 587-597.
Eberl, D.D., Nuesch, R., Sucha, V., and Tsipursky, S., 1998.
Measurement of fundamental particle thicknesses by X-ray
diffraction using PVP-10 intercalation. Clays and Clay Minerals,
46:
89-97.
Frey, M., 1987. LowTemperatureMetamorphism. Blackie.
Hamilton, P.J., Giles, M.R., and Ainsworth, P., 1992. K-Ar dating of
illites in Brent Group reservoirs: a regional perspective. Geological
Society Special Publication, 61, pp. 377-340.
Hoffman, J., and Hower, J., 1979. Clay mineral assemblages as low
grade metamorphic geothermometers: application to the thrust
faulted disturbed belt of Montana, USA. SEPM, Special Publica-
tion, 26, pp. 55-79.
Lindgreen, H., Drits, V.A., Sakharov, B.A., Salyn, A.L., Wrang, P.,
and Dainyak, L.G., 2000. Illite-smectite structural changes during
metamorphism in black Cambrian Alum shales from the Baltic
area. American Mineralogist, 85: 1223-1238.
McDowell, S.D., and Elders, W.A., 1980. Authigenic layer silicate
minerals in borehole Elmore 1, Salton Sea geothermal field,
California, USA. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 74:
293-310.
Moore, D.M., and Reynolds, R.C., 1997. X-Ray Diffiaction and ihe
Identification and Analysis of Clay Minerals. Oxford University
Press.
Nadeau, P.H., Wilson, M.J., McHardy, W.J., and Tait, J., 1984.
Interstratified clay as fundamental particles. Science, 225: 923-925.
Schroeder, P.A., and McLain, A.A., 1998. Illite-smectites and the
influence of burial diagenesis on the geochemical cycling of
nitrogen. Clay Minerals, 33 : 539-546.
Srodori, J., 1999a. Use of clay minerals in reconstructing geological
processes: current advances and some perspectives. ClavMinerals,
34:
27-37.
Srodori, J., 1999b. Nature of mixed-layer clays and mechanisms of
their formation and alteration. Annual Review of Earth and
Planetary Sciences, 27:
19-53.
Srodori, J., Eberl, D.D., and Drits, V., 2000. Evolution of funda-
mental particle-size during illitization of smectite and
implications for reaction mechanism. Clays and Clay Minerals,
48:
446-458.
Srodori, J., Clauer, N., and Eberl, D.D., 2002. Interpretation of K-Ar
dates of illitic clays from sedimentary rocks aided by modelling.
Ameriean Mineralogist, 87: 1528-1535.
Sucha, V., Srodori, J., Clauer, N., Elsass, F., Eberl, D.D., Kraus, I.,
and Madejova, J., 2001. Weathering of smectite and illite-smectite
in Central-European temperate climatic conditions. Clay Minerals,
36:
403-419.
Cross-references
Bentonites and Tonsteins
Clay Mineralogy
Diagenesis
Fabric, Porosity, and Permeability
Glaucony and Verdine
Mixed-Layer Clays
Mudrocks
IMBRICATION AND FLOW-ORIENTED CLASTS
Imbrication is the overlapping arrangement of similar parts, as
of roof tiles or fish scales. The earliest use of "imbricate" or
related words by geologists quoted in the Oxford English Dic-
tionary are by Dana (1852, 1862) and by A. Geike (1858) to
describe biologic or paleontologic objects. An illustration of
sedimentary imbrication is given as early as Jamieson (1860),
reproduced here in Figure 12. A modified version of this figure
appears in the llth and 12th editions of Lyell's (1872, 1875,
p.
342) Principles, but neither Jamieson nor Lyell use any form
of the word "imbricate" in their discussions of the figures.
Imbrication, which is a special case of flow-oriented clasts, is
a common phenomenon, but observations and theory con-
cerning it are published rarely. The flow-orientation of a single
clast develops in many ways. To understand the flow
orientation of clasts in different environments can improve
interpretation of rocks, and lead to a better understanding of
sediment transport.
Imbricated clasts must have unequal lengths for their a, b, c
axes {a longest, c shortest). Usually, imbricated clasts are
approximately tabular in shape, where the a and b axes
significantly exceed the c axis. Roof tiles, or fish scales, or
tabular rock fragments can be imbricated; basketballs, or
grapes, or spherical sand grains cannot. As suggested by
Figure 12, imbricated clasts must be approximately similar in
absolute size: flat pebbles can form an imbricated group, but a
flat pebble cannot imbricate with a flat boulder.
Jamieson (1860, p. 350) suggests that flow orientation, such
as shown in Figure 12, "is best exemplified when the stones are
pretty large, say, from six to twelve inches in length."
However, flow orientation and imbrication occurs in finer
sediments, including sand (Gibbons, 1972), although com-
pared to pebbles or boulders, sand grains have more random
orientations because their size is smaller relative to the
turbulent eddies, and their submerged weight is relatively less
than the drag exerted by such eddies. On the larger scale,
boulders have been imbricated in debris flows and floods
(Blair, 1987, his figure 7C).
Sediment sorting determines the likelihood of imbrication.
A well-sorted collection of flat pebbles commonly contains an
imbricated array sueh as in Figure 12, but a poorly sorted sand