
IMPREGNATION
375
tacky acetate sheet applied to the sediment surface is an
alternate approach that avoids the subsequent shrinkage
problem. However, the acetate peel can only bond to sur-
face grains and may not provide a complete, representative
sample.
A more common approach to imbedding involves filling the
entire sample with a cement to preserve the sedimentary
structures. In practice, a large number of possible embedding
materials exist, and availability varies in different areas. In
general, embedding media can be characterized as either water-
soluble or insoluble. Soluble materials are useful when the
sample is wet, such as recent lacustrine or marine sediments.
The two most common soluble materials include diluted
ordinary glue and polyethylene glycol (PEG). The sample is
immersed in the liquid embedding material and allowed to
soak for several days or longer to allow the embedding fluid to
fully infiltrate the sample. Generally, the PEG used for
embedding is a high molecular weight (> 800) variety and is
a waxy solid at room temperature. The PEG flakes must be
melted by the application of heat during the soaking process.
Although the water-soluble media are nontoxic and require no
specialized equipment to use, they often result in some
shrinkage, are generally too soft for thin sectioning, require
non-aqueous grinding fluids, and they have poor optical
properties.
Water insoluble media are generally either epoxy or acrylic
resins that require the sample to be dehydrated prior to
embedding to obtain full polymerization of the resin com-
pounds. While air or oven drying may be suitable for sandy or
gravelly samples, finer textured samples will crack and shrink
during drying, and the dry permeability of the sample will
often be too low to allow full infiltration of the embedding
material, especially into the center of larger samples.
Two common methods for dehydrating samples to minimize
shrinkage are to sublimate the sample water under vacuum
(freeze drying) or by using repeated liquid-liquid replacements.
Freeze drying effectively d.ehydrates samples of all textures,
although many commercial units are limited to small samples
(less than a few centimeters). Where suitable equipment is
available, freeze-drying produces minimal disturbance of
the sample if the sample is first frozen with liquid nitrogen
(Bouma, 1969). Pre-freezing is particularly important for clay-
rich samples, as the rapid freezing in nitrogen prevents the
formation of large ice crystals in the sample that result in voids
in the embedded sample. However, some ice crystal formation
tends to occur in very fine clay units, particularly if the
sediment sample .is more than
1
cm thick. Depending on the
rate of sample drying and the sediment composition, some
minor shrinkage may also occur and cracks may form at
sedimentary contacts. Moreover, the freeze-dried samples are
extremely fragile and coarse units may require support to
prevent collapse during handling.
The second approach to dehydrating samples involves
replacing the pore water with a water and resin miseible
solution. Most epoxy resins are compatible with acetone and
various alcohols. By replacing the pore water with such a fluid,
there is no shrinkage or disturbance to the sedimentary
structures. This method is suitable for a variety of sediments
including those from clay-rich lacustrine, marine, and glacio-
genic environments. The wet samples are submerged in the
replacement fluid that is left to fully infiltrate into the sample,
often for one or more days. The fluid is then drawn off and
replaced with fresh solution until the specific gravity of the
supernatant indicates that the water content is below
1
percent
(or less). Liquid-liquid replacement dehydration of samples
results in the least disturbance of samples, as there is no
shrinkage or danger of ice crystal casts in the final embedded
sample. However, the process is time consuming and uses a
large amount of the exchange fluid and resin. In some cases,
application of a light vacuum during the resin infiltration can
avoid extra resin waste.
Selection of the embedding resin varies considerably among
users,
ranging from slow curing acrylics (months) to rapid
curing epoxies (hours). Some epoxy resins that cure rapidly are
unsuitable because they are strongly exothermic and can
disturb the sample. Depending on circumstances, a variety of
resins can be used (Tippkotter and Ritz, 1996). Low viscosity
resins used for embedding histologieal and material samples
are readily available and suitable for fine-grained lacustrine
and marine sediments. Less specialized, higher viscosity resins
are suitable for coarser samples. Most require curing in an
oven to fully polymerize. The advantages of impregnating
samples with resin include standard handling procedures for
thin section preparation, excellent optical characteristics, and
permanent preservation of the sample. Compared to water-
soluble media, impregnating samples with resin is often time
consuming and relatively expensive. Moreover, more specia-
lized equipment is required, including facilities to handle what
are typically toxic chemicals.
Partial curing of an impregnated block, especially with
epoxy resins, usually indicates the presence of water in the
sample or poor resin infiltration. Increased infiltration
times using resins with long working times can avoid this
problem, and light vacuum may also accelerate infiltration. In
some situations, samples with incomplete infiltration can still
be cut and the exposed face treated with resin to complete the
stabilization prior to mounting (Carr and Lee, 1998).
Impregnation of sedimentary samples has proven to be a
valuable technique for geologists working in a wide range of
environments where sample preservation and microscopic
analysis has been limited by poorly consolidated materials. A
number of methods are available for impregnation, depending
on sample texture and moisture content. Samples that are
dehydrated and embedded with epoxy resins are suitable for
most applications, although simpler methods are available
as well.
Scott F. Lamoureux
Bibliography
Bouma, A.H., 1969. Methods for the Study of Sedimentary Structures.
John Wiley & Sons.
Carr, S.J., and Lee, J.A., 1998. Thin-section production of diamicts:
problems and solutions. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 68:
217-220.
Murphy, C.P., 1986. Thin Section Preparation of Soils and Sediments.
Berkhansted; A B Academic.
Tippkotter, R., and Ritz, K., 1996. Evaluation of polyester, epoxy and
acrylic resins for suitability in preparation of soil thin-sections for
insitu biological studies. Geoderma, 69: 31-57.
Cross-references
Bedding and Internal Structures
Fabric, Porosity, and Permeability
Relief Peels