
Chapter 13 ABDOMINAL PAIN 89
however, studies have demonstrated that pain medication may be given to selected patients
with stable vital signs because the analgesic effect may be reversed readily at any time by the
administration of naloxone. In a review article, Ranji et al found that pain control with opiates
may alter the physical examination findings, but these changes result in no significant increase
in management errors. Although inconclusive, a growing body of data suggests that evaluation
of acute abdominal disease may be facilitated when severe pain has been controlled and the
patient can cooperate more fully.
13. Which are the most useful preliminary laboratory tests to order?
A complete blood count with differential and urinalysis are generally recommended. The
initial hematocrit helps to define antecedent anemia. An elevated WBC count suggests
significant pathology but is nonspecific. Elevated urinary specific gravity reflects
dehydration, and an increased urinary bilirubin in the absence of urobilinogen points
toward total obstruction of the common bile duct. Pyuria, hematuria, and a positive
dipstick for glucose and ketones may reveal nonsurgical causes for abdominal pain. For
patients with epigastric or right upper quadrant pain, lipase and liver function studies are
advised. Any woman with childbearing capability should receive a pregnancy test. Serum
electrolytes, glucose, blood urea nitrogen, and creatinine are indicated if there is clinical
dehydration or other reason to suspect abnormality such as renal failure, diabetes, or a
metabolic acidosis.
14. Are plain radiographs always indicated?
No. Plain films of the abdomen have the highest yield when used in the evaluation of patients
with suspected bowel obstruction, intussusception, ileus, and free air secondary to a
perforated viscus. They have much less utility in detecting intra-abdominal mass, renal calculi,
diverticulitis, gallbladder disease, and abdominal aortic aneurysms. If these disorders are
suspected, other studies such as ultrasound or abdominal CT are more appropriate.
Conversely, among patients with uncomplicated peptic ulcer disease or massive hematemesis,
pain present for more than 1 week, strangulated abdominal wall hernias, or other obvious
clinical indications for laparotomy, plain radiographs add little.
15. Which plain films are most useful?
Traditional teaching holds that plain abdominal films should include a supine view, plus either
an upright view or a left lateral decubitus view (if unable to stand).
The supine view of the abdomen is the most informative and worthwhile abdominal film.
The upright film is superior for visualizing air-fluid levels associated with ileus, obstruction, or
biliary air. The erect chest radiograph is most sensitive for detection of free intraperitoneal air
and may show basal pneumonia, ruptured esophagus, elevated hemidiaphragm, air-fluid levels
associated with subdiaphragmatic or hepatic abscess, pleural effusion, and pneumothorax. In
the evaluation of patients with abdominal pain, the upright chest film, taken alone, has been
shown to be more useful than films of the abdomen itself.
16. Are air-fluid levels within the intestine always abnormal?
No. It is commonly taught that air-fluid levels when seen on an upright abdominal film are
pathognomonic for small bowel obstruction. A study of 300 normal patients by Gammill
and Nice showed, however, that the average number of air-fluid levels was four per patient,
with some films showing 20. Although typically less than 2.5 cm in length, some were 10
cm. Most of the air-fluid levels were found in the large bowel; only 14 of 300 normal patients
studied showed air-fluid levels in the small bowel. The authors suggested that before air-fluid
levels are used as the sole criterion for the diagnosis of paralytic ileus or mechanical
obstruction, one should see more than two air-fluid levels within dilated loops of the small
bowel.