1316
Drilling and Well Completions
at the beginning of the drilling operations and changed at predetermined
intervals (minimum of
40
h). The surface of the coupon is finished smoothly
so
that the effect of corrosion attack can be easily seen. The coupon is mounted
in thermoplastic, which insulates it from the drillpipe to prevent the formation
of a galvanic cell (Figure
4-472).
Two coupons are generally used per string,
one in the kelly-saver sub and a second at crossover sub above the drill collars
[205].
To employ effective control measure, it is very important to determine the type
of corrosion attack. Spot analysis of the corrosion film and careful visual exami-
nation
of
the coupon surface can help in determining the type and severity of
corrosion attack. Generalized corrosion is represented by continuous attack over
the entire surface, but no pitting. The pitting type of corrosion is represented by a
high concentration of pits on the coupon surface. This type of corrosion attack is
the most serious attack resulting from drilling fluids, as discussed earlier. The
severity of general corrosion attack can be determined by weighing the coupon
before and after exposure, and comparing the change in weight. Before installation
the coupon must be clean (Le., free of any corrosion, grease marks, drops of
perspiration, etc.) and weighed. After exposure to the system for a minimum
of
40
hr, the coupon is retrieved, visually examined, then cleaned and reweighed
within one tenth of a milligram. The difference between the initial and final weights
is attributed to corrosion and converted to the corrosion rate (mpy) using Equa-
tion
4-349.
There are several factors such as handling, surface preparation and
cleaning, etc., which can affect the results of the tests. The results obtained from
this test assume uniform corrosion. Therefore, for proper analysis it becomes very
important to include a complete description
of
the exposed coupons. One of the
most important factors
is
visual inspection of the coupon, describing the form of
attack and identifying the corrosion by-product. It is not very difficult to reduce
the corrosion rate,
so
that overall mpy drops; however, the problem may still persist
due to some pitting. It only takes a few sharp pits to cause failure. API Standard
RF’
13B
contains complete information on this test
[206].
Procedures provided by
manufacturers of corrosion coupons should be followed.
To an appreciable degree the coupon experiences the same downhole condi-
tions as the drillstring does. Therefore, its condition represents the corrosive
effects of the downhole environment. However, limitations of this test are that
the coupon is only exposed to the inside of the drillstring and not subject
to
the same stresses. The results obtained are only for certain depth of exposure,
while the corrosion may vary appreciably up and down the hole. Finally, the
results are not available until the tool is pulled out of the hole.
Chemical Testing
During drilling operations, chemical testing of drilling fluids is routinely carried
out in the field. API
has
published recommended test procedures such as API
RP
13B: “Standard Field Procedure for Testing Drilling Fluids”
[206].
A
number
of
service companies such as
NL
Baroid, Milchem and IMCO Services supply test
kits
for chemical analysis with procedures. These tests conform to standards set in API
RP
13B
[206].
The tests monitor the pH of drilling fluids and detect contaminants,
such as dissolved gases
and
salts. These results are used either
to
detect any potential
problem
or
to
verify the effectiveness
of
remedial measures.
pH
Determination
The two most commonly used methods of measuring the pH of a drilling
fluid are a modified coalorimetric method, such as the pHydrion Dispenser;