![](https://cv01.studmed.ru/view/d4240582969/bg8e.png)
In general, given the linear demand function
P = aQ + b (a < 0, b > 0)
the total revenue function is
TR = PQ
= (aQ + b)Q
= aQ
2
+ bQ
This function is quadratic in Q and, since a < 0, the TR curve has an inverted U shape.
Moreover, since the constant term is zero, the curve always intersects the vertical axis at the ori-
gin. This fact should come as no surprise to you; if no goods are sold, the revenue must be zero.
We now turn our attention to the total cost function, TC, which relates the production costs
to the level of output, Q. As the quantity produced rises, the corresponding cost also rises, so
the TC function is increasing. However, in the short run, some of these costs are fixed. Fixed
costs, FC, include the cost of land, equipment, rent and possibly skilled labour. Obviously, in
the long run all costs are variable, but these particular costs take time to vary, so can be thought
of as fixed in the short run. Variable costs, on the other hand, vary with output and include the
cost of raw materials, components, energy and unskilled labour. If VC denotes the variable cost
per unit of output then the total variable cost, TVC, in producing Q goods is given by
TVC = (VC)Q
The total cost is the sum of the contributions from the fixed and variable costs, so is given by
TC = FC + (VC)Q
Now although this is an important economic function, it does not always convey the informa-
tion necessary to compare individual firms. For example, suppose that an international car
company operates two plants, one in the USA and one in Europe, and suppose that the total
annual costs are known to be $200 million and $45 million respectively. Which of these two
plants is regarded as the more efficient? Unfortunately, unless we also know the total number
of cars produced it is impossible to make any judgement. The significant function here is not
the total cost, but rather the average cost per car. If the plants in the USA and Europe manu-
facture 80 000 and 15 000 cars, respectively, their corresponding average costs are
= 2500
200 000 000
80 000
2.2 • Revenue, cost and profit
131
Figure 2.6
MFE_C02b.qxd 16/12/2005 10:59 Page 131