
28 CHAPTER 2 / Statistics and the Research Process
In our studying example, we’d have an ordinal scale if we assigned a 1 to students who
scored best on the test, a 2 to those in second place, and so on. Then we’d ask, “As
study times change, do students’ ranks also tend to change?” Or, if an experiment com-
pares the conditions of first graders to second graders, then this independent variable
involves an ordinal scale. The key here is that ordinal scores indicate only a relative
amount—identifying who scored relatively high or low. Also, there is no zero in ranks,
and the same amount does not separate every pair of adjacent scores: 1st may be only
slightly ahead of 2nd, but 2nd may be miles ahead of 3rd.
A third approach is to use an interval scale. Here each score indicates an actual
quantity, and an equal amount separates any adjacent scores. (For interval scores, re-
member equal intervals between them.) However, although interval scales do include
the number 0, it is not a true zero—it does not mean none of the variable is present.
Therefore, the key here is that you can have less than zero, so an interval scale allows
negative numbers. For example, temperature (in Celsius or Fahrenheit) involves an in-
terval scale: Because 0° does not mean that zero heat is present, you can have even less
heat at 1°. In research, interval scales are common with intelligence or personality
tests: A score of zero does not mean zero intelligence or zero personality. Or, in our
studying research we might determine the average test score and then assign students a
zero if they are average, a ⫹1, ⫹2, and so on, for the amount they are above average,
and a ⫺1, ⫺2, and so on, for the amount they are below average. Then we’d see if more
positive scores tend to occur with higher study times. Or, if we create conditions based
on whether participants are in a positive, negative, or neutral mood, then this indepen-
dent variable reflects an interval scale.
Notice that with an interval scale, it is incorrect to make “ratio” statements that com-
pare one score to another score. For example, at first glance it seems that 4°C is twice as
warm as 2°C. However, if we measure the same physical temperatures using the Fahren-
heit scale, we would have about 35° and 39°, respectively. Now one temperature is not
twice that of the other. Essentially, if we don’t know the true amount of a variable that is
present at 0, then we don’t know the true amount that is present at any other score.
Only with our final scale of measurement, a ratio scale, do the scores reflect the true
amount of the variable that is present. Here the scores measure an actual amount, there
is an equal unit of measurement, and 0 truly means that none of the variable is present.
The key here is that you cannot have negative numbers because you cannot have less
than nothing. Also, only with ratio scores can we make “ratio” statements, such as “4 is
twice as much as 2.” (So for ratio, think ratio!) We used ratio scales in our previous
examples when measuring the number of errors and the number of hours studied. Like-
wise, in an experiment, if we compare the conditions of having people on diets consist-
ing of either 1000, 1500, or 2000 calories a day, then this independent variable involves
a ratio scale.
We can study relationships that involve any combination of the above scales.
REMEMBER The scale of measurement reflected by scores may be nominal,
ordinal, interval, or ratio.
Continuous versus Discrete Scales
A measurement scale may be either continuous or discrete. A continuous scale allows
for fractional amounts; it “continues” between the whole-number amounts, so decimals
make sense. The variable of age is continuous because someone can be 19.6879 years
old. On the other hand, some variables involve a discrete scale, which are measured
only in whole amounts. Here, decimals do not make sense. For example, whether you
2