Radiation Chemistry inNuclear Engineering 1009
addition of different amounts of alpha emitters. Asimulated high-burnup spent nuclear fuel called
SIMFUEL
(Lucuta etal., 1991) was also employed for dissolution studies (Ollila, 1992).
Not
only internal alpha sources but also external sources have been applied. Alpha emitter discs
(
241
Am and
210
Po) were employed in the rst study of alpha-radiolysis affects on UO
2
dissolution by
placing them close to the surface of UO
2
pellets (Bailey etal., 1985). In the presence of alpha-radiation,
the corrosion potential of UO
2
increased to the same level as in the presence of dissolved O
2
.
In recent years, helium ion beam irradiation has also been employed to simulate alpha-radiation.
This method is advantageous in that high dose rates can be achieved and ion energy can be con-
trolled to study the LET effect. Two different types of UO
2
are employed. The rst is colloidal par-
ticles dispersed in aqueous solution (Mennecart etal., 2004a, Suzuki etal., 2006), while the other
is UO
2
discs contacted with water on one face and being irradiated from the opposite face (Corbel
etal., 2001; Sattonnay etal., 2001). The dissolved U(VI) concentration due to ion beam irradiation
was higher than the value following the addition of the same amount of H
2
O
2
generated by the ion
beam,
indicating the effect of radical species is not negligible (Corbel etal., 2006).
Radiation-induced
oxidative dissolution of UO
2
was rst modeled by taking into account the
reactions of radical species with UO
2
(Christensen and Bjergbakke, 1987). Reaction rates at the
UO
2
surface were estimated from the calculated number density of surface U(IV) atoms and homo-
geneous reaction rates for U(IV) in solution. The model was further rened (Christensen etal.,
1994) and one-dimensional diffusion–reaction calculations of UO
2
dissolution were performed by
setting different regions of water subjected to radiation (Christensen, 1998). The model was then
extended to the case of UO
2
dissolution in salt brine (Kelm and Bohnert, 2000a,b). Dissolution rates
of alpha-emitter-doped UO
2
were recently calculated (Christensen, 2006). The reaction rates of UO
2
and radical species were estimated to be about two orders of magnitude larger than for molecular
species. Difculties in setting appropriate values of surface-to-volume ratio were pointed out in the
calculation of the dissolution rates of UO
2
. One-dimensional diffusion–reaction model calculations
of the UO
2
surface were performed to simulate helium ion beam irradiation experiments assum-
ing alpha-dose rate proles from the surface (Poulesquen and Jégou, 2007). The calculated values
of U(VI) and H
2
O
2
were lower than the measured values in both aerated and deaerated cases.
Measured values remained relatively high even in the presence of hydrogen, in contrast to the case
of dissolution experiments under dissolved hydrogen. The authors attributed this to a high dose rate
used in the calculation, which may have overestimated radical–radical recombination to form H
2
O
2
.
Another model of radiolytic oxidative dissolution of UO
2
has been developed in which the reac-
tions of UO
2
were limited to those with H
2
O
2
and O
2
(Eriksen, 1996). The reaction of H
2
O
2
is the
most important and consumption rates of oxidants rapidly decreased possibly due to accumulated
H
2
, which scavenged OH
•
and suppressed H
2
O
2
formation. They also measured dissolution rates of
PWR spent nuclear fuel pellets (Eriksen etal., 1995). In the early stage of the experiments, mea-
sured concentrations of radiolytic products were lower than estimated by the model, and they were
therefore
assumed to have decomposed on the surface.
The
model has been further developed by Jonsson in recent years (Jonsson etal., 2007). Oxidative
dissolution was facilitated by U(VI) carbonate complex formation, and dissolution rates became
proportional to surface oxidation rates when [HCO
3
−
] > 10
−3
mol dm
−3
, typical of groundwater. One-
electron oxidation of UO
2
is considered to be the rate-determining step as the reaction rates of a
series of oxidants with UO
2
were found to be logarithmically proportional to one-electron reduction
potentials (Ekeroth and Jonsson, 2003). Based on UO
2
dissolution rates under gamma-irradiation
and reaction model calculations, the relative contributions of various oxidants to UO
2
oxidation by
water radiolysis were evaluated. It was concluded that contribution of H
2
O
2
was more than 99.9%
and other oxidant species were negligible, which supports the reaction model proposed by Eriksen
(1996)
and (Ekeroth etal., 2006).
One-dimensional
reaction–diffusion model calculations for the surface were also performed.
Dose rate distributions were provided from calculated inventories and geometrical considerations
on the dissipation probability of alpha particles (Nielsen and Jonsson, 2006). Steady-state H
2
O
2