ELECTROMIGRATION IN CU THIN FILMS, HUETAL. 451
where t and s are the median times to failure and the deviations, to be
taken with subscripts 1 through 3, for the first, second, and third log-
normal distribution function, respectively. A
1
and A
2
are the amplitude of
the first and second lifetime group, respectively. As discussed in
Sec. 9.8.2.2, the void growth is strongly influenced by partially and com-
pletely blocking boundaries. In addition, voiding in the interconnects
could occur in several ways, such as by interface void, edge displacement
type (vertical void), grain-thinning-type void, and void growth with reser-
voirs. Therefore, data analysis with more than one log-normal distribution
is justified. Anonlinear least-squares method was used to obtain the opti-
mum values of these parameters, by minimizing c
2
. As can be seen in
Fig. 9.30, the data were best fitted using a tri-modal function. The reduced
c
2
n values dropped by a factor of 2 when fitted with a log-normal versus
a tri-modal function, where n is the degrees of freedom. The values for
the best fitting parameters are shown in Table 9.2. The uncertainties in the
median lifetime and s are about 6 to 20% and 30 to 50%, respectively.
The Cu lifetime was enhanced by an order of magnitude when the thinner
liner was used. Table 9.2 shows that the majority of samples fell in the
third lifetime group (longest).
Apparently, the incoming Cu flux from the 5-mm-wide M1 even with
j 1 mAmm
2
generated sufficient electromigration-induced compres-
sive stress under the V1 liner to allow the Cu atoms to punch through the
3-nm-thick V1 liner to M2, but not the 30-nm-thick liner. A completely
blocking boundary at the cathode end of the Cu line seems to be the case
for the 30-nm-thick liner case, and a short lifetime would be expected
when a void forms at the V1M1 interface (bottom of V1). Only a small
void at this interface is required to cause the line to fail [shown in
Fig. 9.31(a)]. In the case of the 3-nm-thick liner, however, the vacancies
in M2 flowing into the V1M1 interface can be filled by Cu atoms from
M1. Hence, Eq. (6) is no longer valid (J
b
is not equal to 0), and Eq. (10)
should be used. Continuous or partial flow at the boundaries will enable a
very long lifetime and eliminate most of the via bottom voids. However,
despite the variation in liner thickness, if vacancies pile up near the end of
the M2 line to reduce stress and vacancy concentration gradients, the
Table 9.2. Best Fitting Parameter Values for a Tri-Log-Normal Function
Obtained from the Data in Fig. 9.30
LinerThickness (nm) t
1
(h) s
1
a
1
t
2
(h) s
2
a
2
t
3
(h) s
3
30 66 0.13 0.23 1237 0.22 0.33 177 0.88
3 339 0.06 0.1 780 0.15 0.19 1679 0.55