
Characterization and
Properties
of
Nanomaterials
361
depending on the methods used to vary the grain size.89 For example, cop-
per with an average grain size of 6nm has
5
times higher microhardness
over annealed sample having a grain size of
50
pm, and the hardness of pal-
ladium with
5-1Onm
grains is also
5
times higher than that
of
100pm
grained sample.% Pure nanocrystalline copper has a yield strength in excess
of
400
MPa, approximately
6
times higher than that
of
coarse-grained cop-
per.91,92 However, opposite size dependence in copper and palladium was
also reported, i.e.
a
decrease in hardness with decreasing grain size.93
Various models have been proposed for predicting and explaining the size
dependence of strength and hardness in nanomaterials. Two models are
developed to predict opposite size dependence of hardness. Hahn
et
al.94
proposed that grain boundary sliding is the rate-limiting step of deforma-
tion, which explains reasonably well the experimental data that strength and
hardness decrease with a decreasing grain size. Another model used a rule
of mixture approach, in which
two
phases-the bulk intragranular phase and
the grain boundary phase are ~onsidered.~~.~~ The model predicts an increas-
ing hardness with a decreasing grain size, before reaching a maximum at a
critical grain size
of
approximately
5
nm, below which the material begins
to soften. This model fits very well with the experimental data that hardness
increases with a decreasing grain However,
so
far there is no exper-
imental result
to
verify the presence of a critical grain size of
5
nm. Although
mechanical properties of various nanostructured element metals have been
studied, including silver,97 ~opper,~~?~~ palladi~m,~~?~~ iron,99 and
nicke1,Io0 the actual role of grain size or grain boundaries on mechanical
properties is not clear, and many factors can have significant influence on
the measurement
of
mechanical properties of nanostructured materials, such
as residual strains, flaw sizes and internal stresses. Compared to nanostruc-
tured bulk metals, there is even less research and, thus, understanding of the
size effect on the mechanical properties of oxides, though some research has
been reported on Sn02,101 Ti02102,103 and ZnO.Io5 Other mechanical prop-
erties
of
nanostructured materials, such as Young's modulus, creep and
superplasticity, have also been studied; however, there is no solid under-
standing on the size dependence that have been established.
Nanostructured materials may have different elastoplasticity from that
of large-grained bulk materials. For example, near-perfect elastoelasticity
was observed in pure nanocrystalline copper, prepared by means of pow-
der metallurgy, as shown in Fig.
8.1
9.'04
Neither work hardening nor neck
formation was observed in tensile tests, which are common characteristics
of ductile metals and alloys. However, no explanation is available to this
finding. Twinning is observed in nanosized aluminum grains, which have
never been found in particles in micrometers or above.lo5