6.1 The Drell–Yan Process 409
problem is that there is no competing model to QCD at this time. One does not
therefore know how specific the predictions of QCD really are. There may be
other models that describe scaling violations, 3-jet events, and so on equally well.
Conversely many theoreticians consider the fact that there is only one theoretical
candidate for describing quark–quark interactions to be the strongest argument
for the correctness of QCD.
As a result of the analysis described here we conclude that Λ lies in a region
between 100 and 200 MeV. (Λ depends on the renormalization procedure. The
values given are for the
MS scheme; see Sect. 5.1.)
EXERCISE
6.1 The Drell–Yan Cross Section
Problem. Derive the elementary Drell–Yan cross section in (6.5).
Solution. According to the techniques given in Chap. 2, we get
dσ =
e
4
2M
2
d
3
q
1
(2π)
3
2E
d
3
q
2
(2π)
3
1
4
F
2
M
4
(2π)
4
δ
4
( p
1
+ p
2
−q
1
−q
2
). (1)
Here we have simply neglected the quark and gluon masses, thus getting the
flux factor to 1/M
2
.(M is the invariant mass of the two quarks.) Spin-averaging
yields a factor of 1/4, and F
2
is calculated from
F
2
=tr( p/
1
γ
µ
p/
2
γ
ν
) tr(q/
1
γ
µ
q/
2
γ
ν
)
=16( p
µ
1
p
ν
2
+ p
µ
2
p
ν
1
−g
µν
p
1
· p
2
)(q
1µ
q
2ν
+q
2µ
q
1ν
−g
µν
q
1
·q
2
)
=32(q
1
· p
1
q
2
· p
2
+q
1
· p
2
q
2
· p
1
). (2)
This is simplest in the center-of-momentum frame, where
dσ =
e
4
8M
2
d
3
q
1
(2π)
2
M
6
F
2
δ(2q
0
1
−2 p
0
1
). (3)
With p
1
= (E, 0, 0, E), p
2
= (E, 0, 0, −E), q
1
= (E, E sin θ cos φ, E sin θ
×sin φ, E cos θ) and q
2
=(E, −E sin θ cos φ, −E sin θ sin φ, −E cos θ),itfol-
lows that
F
2
=32
E
4
(1 −cos θ)
2
+E
4
(1 +cos θ)
2
=64E
4
(1 +cos
2
θ) , (4)
and therefore
dσ =
e
4
8M
2
d(cos θ) E
2
4πM
6
64E
4
(1 +cos
2
θ) (5)