72 THE NEAR EAST AND THE EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN
the Great Bath served some ritual purpose involving water, not merely hygiene or sheer pleasure,
the main functions of later Roman bathing establishments.
Next to the Great Bath, on the west, was found the substructure of a building identified
as a granary by Sir Mortimer Wheeler, thanks to his explorations in 1950. This substructure,
whose original core measured 46m × 23m before an enlargement was made on the south side,
consisted of twenty-seven solid blocks of baked bricks divided by a grid of narrow passageways,
two east-west, eight (later nine) north-south. The building proper, set on these foundations,
was made of wood. Traces of the sockets for holding wooden beams were discovered embed-
ded into the brick podium. The passageways would have contributed to the aeration of the
building and its contents. Wheeler’s interpretation is controversial, however. The finds from the
building neither support nor disprove his theory, for they were not carefully recorded at the
time of the original excavations in the 1920s. All we can be certain of, then, is a large wooden
building. According to J. M. Kenoyer, this may well be a large hall. It does differ in design,
however, from another candidate for such a function, the “Assembly hall” located to the south
(see below).
A similar building at Kalibangan in the Indian Punjab may shed light on the function of this
building. Here, clear traces of ritual practice were found, evidence lacking in the “granary” of
Mohenjo-Daro. In the south part of the citadel mound at Kalibangan, brick platforms were sepa-
rated by narrow brick-paved passages. The surfaces of these platforms were damaged. On one
platform a row of seven fire altars was discovered, as well as a rock-lined pit containing animal
bones and antlers, a well head, and a drain. This area, entered by a broad flight of steps on the
south, must have been a ritual center for animal sacrifice, ritual bathing, and a cult of the sacred
fire. Similar fire pits have been found in a small brick-walled courtyard set apart in the lower town
of Kalibangan. Because fire worship was associated with the later Indo-Aryans, some scholars
have postulated their presence here, even at this early date.
Although it is tantalizing to imagine such functions for the “Granary,” excavations have not
yielded supporting evidence. The link between the two buildings may simply be in the common
approach to monumental architecture, with solid brick foundations separated by channels – a
structural basis that could be adapted for a variety of purposes.
Buildings to the north and east of the Great Bath at Mohenjo-Daro include one called the
“College.” Marshall attributed it to a high priest or group of priests, but there is no evidence to
support such an interpretation. Its function remains unclear.
The last of the major buildings on the citadel lies in the south-east, apart from the above-
mentioned three. The “Assembly hall,” as it is called, originally measured 28m
2
. Its interior was
divided into equal aisles by three rows of five brick plinths, bases for wooden columns. The floor
consisted of finely sawn brick work, recalling the typical flooring of bathrooms. Large square
rooms of this sort with columns or piers to hold up the roofing are found most notably in Egyp-
tian and Achaemenid Persian architecture, and served public gatherings on the grand scale, either
religious or secular. The name of the building, the Assembly hall, was suggested by this analogy.
The lower town
The town proper lies to the east of the citadel. Streets running approximately north-south and
east-west divided the large area into blocks of ca. 370m × 250m. Of perhaps twelve blocks, seven
have been investigated by archaeologists. The citadel may, in fact, occupy one of the central
blocks on the west side. Main streets could be as wide as 10m, while side streets were narrower,