the nuclear family composed of parents and preadult
children; sometimes it included an elderly grandparent
and other family dependents as well. They lived in small
round huts c onstructed of pack ed mud and topped with a
conical thatch roof. In most African societies, these nuclear
family units would in turn be combined into larger kin-
ship communities known as households or lineage groups.
The lineage group was similar in many respects to the
clan in China or the class system in India in that it was
normally based on kinship ties, although sometimes out-
siders such as friends or other dependents may have been
admitted to membership. Throughout the prec olonial era,
lineages served, in the words of one historian, as the ‘‘basic
building block s ’’ of Afr ican society. The authority of the
leading members of the lineage group was substantial. As
in China, the elders had considerable power over the
economic fu nctions of the other people in the group,
which provided mutual support for all members.
A village would usually be composed of a single
lineage group, although some communities may have
consisted of several unrelated families. At the head of the
village was the familiar ‘‘big man,’’ who was often assisted
by a council of representatives of the various households
in the community. Often the ‘‘big man’’ was believed to
possess supernatural powers, and as the village grew in
size and power, he might eventually be transformed into a
local chieftain or monarch.
The Role of Women
Although generalizations are risky, we can say that
women were usually subordinate to men in Africa, as in
most early societies. In some cases, they were valued for
the work they could do or for their role in increasing the
size of the lineage group. Polygyny was not uncommon,
particularly in Muslim societies. Women often worked in
the fields while the men of the village tended the cattle or
went on hunting expeditions. In some communities, the
women specialized in commercial activities. In one area
in southern Africa, young girls were sent into the mines
to extract gold because of their smaller physiques.
But there were some key differences between the role
of women in Africa and elsewhere. In many African so-
cieties, lineage was matrilinear rather than patrilinear.
As Ibn Battuta observed during his travels in West Africa,
‘‘A man does not pass on inheritance except to the sons of
his sister to the exclusion of his own sons.’’
8
He said he
had never encountered this custom before except among
the unbelievers of the Malabar coast in India. Women
were often permitted to inherit property, and the hus-
band was often expected to move into his wife’s house.
Relations between the genders were also sometimes
more relaxed than in China or India, with none of the
taboos characteristic of those societies. Again, in the
words of Ibn Battuta, himself a Muslim:
With regard to their women, they are not modest in the
presence of men, they do not veil themselves in spite of their
perseverance in the prayers. ... The women there have
friends and companions amongst men outside the prohibited
degrees of marriage [i.e., other than brothers, fathers, etc.].
Likewise for the men, there are companions from amongst
women outside the prohibited degrees. One of them would
enter his house to find his wife with her companion and
would not disapprove of that conduct.
Wh en Ibn Battuta asked an African acquaintance about
these customs, the latter responded: ‘‘Women ’s compan-
ionship with men in our country is honorable and takes
place in a good way: there is no suspicion about it. They are
not like the women in your country .’’ Ibn Battuta noted his
astonishment at such a ‘‘thoughtless’’ answer and did not
accept further invitations to visit his friend’s house.
9
Such informal attitudes toward the relationship be-
tween the genders were not found everywhere in Africa
and were probably curtailed as many Africans converted
to Islam (see the box on p. 201). But it is a testimony to
the tenacity of traditional customs that the relatively
puritanical views about the role of women in society
brought by Muslims from the Middle East made little
impression even among Muslim families in West Africa.
Slavery
African slavery is often associated with the period after
1500. Indeed, the slave trade did reach enormous pro-
portions in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, when
Eur opean slave ships transported millions of unfortunate
victims abroad to Europe or the Americas (see Chapter 14).
Slavery did not originate w ith the coming of the
Europeans, however. It had been practiced in Africa since
ancient times and probably originated with prisoners of
war who wer e for ced into perpetual servitude. Slavery was
common in ancient Egypt and became especially preva-
lent during the New Kingdom, when slaving expeditions
brought back thousands of captives from the upper Nile
to be used in labor gangs, for tribute, and even as human
sacrifices.
Slavery persisted during the early period of state
building, in the first and early second millennia
C.E. Berber
tribes may have regularly raided agricultural communities
south of the Sahara for captives who were transported
northward and eventually sold throughout the Mediter-
ranean. Some were enrolled as soldiers, while others, often
women, were used as domestic servants in the homes of
the well-to-do. The use of captives for forced labor or for
sale was apparently also common in African societies
farther to the south and along the eastern coast.
200 CHAPTER 8 EARLY CIVILIZATIONS IN AFRICA