188 The supercooled liquid
by (a) averaging the energy for all the extrema (irrespective of the temperature correspond-
ing to the initial configuration) with a given index density (geometric average) and (b), at
a given temperature T , averaging all the energies and the corresponding index densities
(parametric average). The K(u) curve meets the energy axis at a threshold value u
th
that
marks the border between the saddle-dominated part of PEL and the minima-dominated
part. u
th
is above the lowest-lying minimum, u
0
, which is found in the PEL, indicating
the existence of a finite energy-density interval within which there are overwhelmingly
more minima than saddles. With increasing temperature, u
0
increases and eventually, at
a critical temperature T
th
, crosses u
th
. Thus, for T > T
th
the representative point of the
system is in the part of the PEL which is dominated by saddles. This temperature T
th
there-
fore indicates a crossover from nonactivated dynamics (above T
th
) to activated dynamics
(below T
th
). The evidence from the landscape studies on model systems strongly suggests
that T
th
is close to the T
c
at which the extrapolated self-diffusion coefficient of a parti-
cle in the liquid goes to zero. For the BMLJ system at ρ =1.2 one obtains T
th
=0.435
(Angelani et al., 2000), or 0.44 (Broderix et al., 2000). Computer simulation (Kob and
Andersen, 1994, 1995a, 1995b) of the same system shows that the self-diffusion coeffi-
cient goes to zero with a power law at T
c
= 0.435 (see Section 8.2.3 in Chapter 8 for more
details). The results from another typical fragile liquid, i.e., soft-sphere, mixture (simu-
lated using MC methods) indicate a similar relation: T
th
=0.242 ± 0.012 (Grigera et al.,
2002) and the corresponding T
c
= 0.226 (Roux et al., 1989). We will see in Chapter 8 that
this temperature T
c
can be identified with the dynamic transition point of mode-coupling
theory (MCT) in the sense that power-law growth of the relaxation time occurs.
4.3.2 The free-energy landscape
The thermodynamic free energy is a function of temperature and has a characteristic value
corresponding to an equilibrium state. For the study of the glassy state this concept is often
generalized to a coarse-grained Hamiltonian in terms of a set of suitable order parameters.
The most obvious choice of the parameters for the coarse-grained Hamiltonian of a system
with aperiodic density profiles is a set of spatial coordinates {R
i
} that corresponds to the
centers of the inhomogeneous density profiles. In other words the {R
i
} denote the average
positions of the constituent particles in a localized state. Such a parametrization defines
a multi-dimensional landscape. With the entropic contribution included this is generally
referred to as the free-energy landscape. Such models for supercooled liquids have been
studied by evaluating the free-energy functional for a small number of particles. The size
of the system considered is much smaller than the thermodynamic limit. The spirit of such
models is similar to that of MD simulations with a finite-sized system.
The optimization of the Ramakrishnan–Yussouff (RY) free-energy functional with
respect to aperiodic density profiles was done numerically (Dasgupta, 1992) in the super-
cooled regime. This involved computing the free energy for a small volume L
3
having
L = 4σ to 6σ , where σ is the hard-sphere diameter with periodic and free boundary
conditions. The volume was divided into a cubic grid with lattice constant a
0
= 0.2σ ,